Flow Diversion for Small Branches and Distal Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Subanalysis of the Post‐FD Registry

Mahmoud Dibas, J. Vivanco-Suarez, A. Rodriguez-Calienes, Gustavo M. Cortez, Vitor Mendes Pereira, H. Nishi, Gabor Toth, Thomas Patterson, David Altschul, C. Feigen, M. Essibayi, M. Galecio-Castillo, Johanna T. Fifi, S. Matsoukas, Peter Kan, M. U. Hafeez, Ajit S. Puri, A. L. Kuhn, Ajay K. Wakhloo, Margarita Rabinovich, Priyank Khandelwal, E. Sauvageau, A. Aghaebrahim, M. Costa, Stephen Monteith, M. Farooqui, Ricardo A. Hanel, S. Ortega Gutierrez
{"title":"Flow Diversion for Small Branches and Distal Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Subanalysis of the Post‐FD Registry","authors":"Mahmoud Dibas, J. Vivanco-Suarez, A. Rodriguez-Calienes, Gustavo M. Cortez, Vitor Mendes Pereira, H. Nishi, Gabor Toth, Thomas Patterson, David Altschul, C. Feigen, M. Essibayi, M. Galecio-Castillo, Johanna T. Fifi, S. Matsoukas, Peter Kan, M. U. Hafeez, Ajit S. Puri, A. L. Kuhn, Ajay K. Wakhloo, Margarita Rabinovich, Priyank Khandelwal, E. Sauvageau, A. Aghaebrahim, M. Costa, Stephen Monteith, M. Farooqui, Ricardo A. Hanel, S. Ortega Gutierrez","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.001296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Flow diversion (FD) has emerged as an effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. However, there is limited evidence regarding its safety and efficacy specifically for distal and small‐artery aneurysms of the posterior circulation. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of FD for aneurysms arising from the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery, and the P2 and P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery.\n \n \n \n This is a subanalysis of the Post‐FD (Posterior Circulation Aneurysms Treated With Flow Diversion) registry, highlighting distal aneurysms in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery, and the P2 and P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery treated with FD. Aneurysm characteristics and patient outcomes were described for the total series, and a more focused analysis comparing fusiform/dissecting versus saccular aneurysms was performed. The primary treatment outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond–Roy class 1). Primary safety outcome was major ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke following FD. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome, aneurysm retreatment, and in‐stent stenosis.\n \n \n \n \n Overall, 36 patients with 36 aneurysms were treated with FD, with a median age of 60.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52.8—65.3 years). Of those, 13 were fusiform/dissecting, while 23 were saccular aneurysms. Complete occlusion was achieved in 78.1% for all aneurysms at a median follow‐up of 14.0 months (IQR, 9.3–48.6 months). There was a nonsignificant trend in rates of complete occlusion between fusiform/dissecting (91.7%) and saccular aneurysms (70%;\n P\n = 0.151). Major stroke was reported in 2 cases (5.6%) and in‐stent stenosis in 4 (11.1%), and retreatment was required for 4 aneurysms (11.4%) There was no difference in rates of major stroke, in‐stent stenosis, or retreatment between fusiform/dissecting and saccular aneurysms.\n \n \n \n \n This study suggests the safety and feasibility of FD for distal aneurysms of the posterior circulation, particularly fusiform/dissecting aneurysms. Further larger‐scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow diversion (FD) has emerged as an effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. However, there is limited evidence regarding its safety and efficacy specifically for distal and small‐artery aneurysms of the posterior circulation. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of FD for aneurysms arising from the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery, and the P2 and P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery. This is a subanalysis of the Post‐FD (Posterior Circulation Aneurysms Treated With Flow Diversion) registry, highlighting distal aneurysms in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery, and the P2 and P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery treated with FD. Aneurysm characteristics and patient outcomes were described for the total series, and a more focused analysis comparing fusiform/dissecting versus saccular aneurysms was performed. The primary treatment outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond–Roy class 1). Primary safety outcome was major ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke following FD. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome, aneurysm retreatment, and in‐stent stenosis. Overall, 36 patients with 36 aneurysms were treated with FD, with a median age of 60.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52.8—65.3 years). Of those, 13 were fusiform/dissecting, while 23 were saccular aneurysms. Complete occlusion was achieved in 78.1% for all aneurysms at a median follow‐up of 14.0 months (IQR, 9.3–48.6 months). There was a nonsignificant trend in rates of complete occlusion between fusiform/dissecting (91.7%) and saccular aneurysms (70%; P = 0.151). Major stroke was reported in 2 cases (5.6%) and in‐stent stenosis in 4 (11.1%), and retreatment was required for 4 aneurysms (11.4%) There was no difference in rates of major stroke, in‐stent stenosis, or retreatment between fusiform/dissecting and saccular aneurysms. This study suggests the safety and feasibility of FD for distal aneurysms of the posterior circulation, particularly fusiform/dissecting aneurysms. Further larger‐scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后循环小分支和远端动脉瘤的血流转向:后FD注册子分析
血流转向(FD)已成为治疗颅内动脉瘤的一种有效方法。然而,有关其安全性和有效性的证据有限,尤其是对于后循环的远端动脉瘤和小动脉动脉瘤。本研究旨在调查小脑后下动脉、小脑前下动脉、小脑上动脉以及大脑后动脉 P2 和 P3 段动脉瘤的 FD 治疗效果。 这是Post-FD(后循环动脉瘤经血流转向治疗)登记的子分析,重点是经FD治疗的小脑后下动脉、小脑前下动脉、小脑上动脉以及大脑后动脉P2和P3段的远端动脉瘤。对整个系列的动脉瘤特征和患者预后进行了描述,并对纺锤形/解剖型动脉瘤与囊状动脉瘤进行了更集中的分析比较。主要治疗结果是动脉瘤完全闭塞(Raymond-Roy 1级)。主要安全性结果为动脉瘤完全闭塞后的主要缺血性/出血性中风。次要结局包括功能结局、动脉瘤再治疗和支架内狭窄。 共有 36 名患者的 36 个动脉瘤接受了 FD 治疗,中位年龄为 60.0 岁(四分位数间距 [IQR],52.8-65.3 岁)。其中,13 个为纺锤形/剖面动脉瘤,23 个为囊状动脉瘤。在中位随访 14.0 个月(IQR,9.3-48.6 个月)时,78.1% 的动脉瘤实现了完全闭塞。纺锤形/剖开型动脉瘤(91.7%)和囊状动脉瘤(70%;P = 0.151)的完全闭塞率呈不显著趋势。有 2 例(5.6%)报告了严重中风,4 例(11.1%)报告了支架内狭窄,4 例动脉瘤(11.4%)需要再次治疗。 这项研究表明,后循环远端动脉瘤,尤其是纺锤形/解剖动脉瘤,采用 FD 是安全可行的。为证实这些研究结果,有必要进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1