The effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on quality of life in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1515/jom-2023-0218
Jacqueline Nikakis, Ermin Tale, Denis Malkov, Uddampreet S Arora, Jordan Keys, To Shan Li, Sheldon C Yao, Todd J Cohen
{"title":"The effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on quality of life in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.","authors":"Jacqueline Nikakis, Ermin Tale, Denis Malkov, Uddampreet S Arora, Jordan Keys, To Shan Li, Sheldon C Yao, Todd J Cohen","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nOsteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been demonstrated to have an effect on the autonomic nervous system, which may have antiarrhythmic effects. The effects of OMT in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have not previously been reported. This study investigated the impact of OMT on quality of life (QOL) in this patient population.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of OMT on QOL in CIED patients.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSubjects with CIEDs were recruited into a double-blind randomized controlled institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04004741) and randomized to OMT or light touch (control) groups. Subjects received a one-time intervention, performed by board-certified neuromusculoskeletal medicine (NMM) and osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) physicians. The OMT protocol utilized techniques including myofascial release, rib raising, facilitated positional release (FPR), and osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine. Subjects' QOL was assessed immediately preceding intervention and one-month postintervention utilizing the Research ANd Development (RAND) 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36, eight parameters). Groups were compared utilizing unpaired t tests; α=0.05.\n\n\nRESULTS\nForty-two subjects were enrolled, with four lost to follow-up, which resulted in 19 OMT and 19 control subjects for analysis. Of the eight QOL parameters, two showed significant improvement with OMT: role limitations due to physical health (p=0.001) and pain (p=0.003).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis study demonstrates the potential for QOL improvement in CIED patients. Specifically, subjects in the OMT group reported an improvement in activities of daily living as well as a decrease in overall pain, including pain interfering with work. Additional research is necessary to further understand the physiologic effects of OMT, including its effects on arrhythmias, in CIED patients.","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been demonstrated to have an effect on the autonomic nervous system, which may have antiarrhythmic effects. The effects of OMT in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have not previously been reported. This study investigated the impact of OMT on quality of life (QOL) in this patient population. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of OMT on QOL in CIED patients. METHODS Subjects with CIEDs were recruited into a double-blind randomized controlled institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04004741) and randomized to OMT or light touch (control) groups. Subjects received a one-time intervention, performed by board-certified neuromusculoskeletal medicine (NMM) and osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) physicians. The OMT protocol utilized techniques including myofascial release, rib raising, facilitated positional release (FPR), and osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine. Subjects' QOL was assessed immediately preceding intervention and one-month postintervention utilizing the Research ANd Development (RAND) 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36, eight parameters). Groups were compared utilizing unpaired t tests; α=0.05. RESULTS Forty-two subjects were enrolled, with four lost to follow-up, which resulted in 19 OMT and 19 control subjects for analysis. Of the eight QOL parameters, two showed significant improvement with OMT: role limitations due to physical health (p=0.001) and pain (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the potential for QOL improvement in CIED patients. Specifically, subjects in the OMT group reported an improvement in activities of daily living as well as a decrease in overall pain, including pain interfering with work. Additional research is necessary to further understand the physiologic effects of OMT, including its effects on arrhythmias, in CIED patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整骨疗法对心脏植入式电子装置患者生活质量的影响。
CONTEXTOsteopathic manipulative treatment(OMT)已被证实对自律神经系统有影响,可能具有抗心律失常的作用。关于整骨疗法对心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)患者的影响,此前尚未见报道。本研究旨在调查 OMT 对 CIED 患者生活质量(QOL)的影响。方法将 CIED 受试者招募到机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的双盲随机对照临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT04004741)中,并随机分配到 OMT 组或轻触组(对照组)。受试者接受一次性干预,由获得神经肌肉骨骼医学(NMM)和整骨疗法(OMM)认证的医生实施。整骨疗法方案采用的技术包括肌筋膜松解术、肋骨抬高术、体位促进松解术(FPR)和颅骨整骨疗法。受试者的 QOL 在干预前和干预后一个月进行评估,采用研究与发展(RAND)36 项简表健康调查(SF-36,8 个参数)。结果共有 42 名受试者参加,其中 4 人失去了随访机会,因此分析对象为 19 名 OMT 受试者和 19 名对照组受试者。在八项QOL参数中,有两项参数在OMT治疗后有明显改善:身体健康导致的角色限制(p=0.001)和疼痛(p=0.003)。具体而言,OMT组的受试者报告日常生活活动有所改善,总体疼痛有所减轻,包括影响工作的疼痛。要进一步了解 OMT 对 CIED 患者的生理影响,包括对心律失常的影响,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
Comparing cranial suture interdigitation in humans and non-human primates: unearthing links to osteopathic cranial concept. Protecting the profession: lessons from the recent physician scandals. The rise of advanced practice provider independence bills: a misguided attempt to address the physician shortage. Analysis of self-reported confidence in independent prescribing among osteopathic medical graduating seniors. Foot and ankle fellowship-trained osteopathic orthopaedic surgeons: a review, analysis, and understanding of current trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1