The incidences of nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia with remimazolam versus sevoflurane: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.4097/kja.23939
Y. Yoo, Jae Hong Park, K. Lee, Ah Hyeon Yi, Tae Kyun Kim
{"title":"The incidences of nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia with remimazolam versus sevoflurane: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Y. Yoo, Jae Hong Park, K. Lee, Ah Hyeon Yi, Tae Kyun Kim","doi":"10.4097/kja.23939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) refers to nausea and vomiting that occurs within 24-h after surgery or in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Previous studies have reported that the use of remimazolam, a newer benzodiazepine (BDZ) hypnotic, for anesthesia results in less PONV. In this study, we compared the rate of PONV between sevoflurane and remimazolam after general anesthesia.\n\n\nMethods\nIn this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), participants aged 20-80 years who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or hemicolectomy were randomized to either the remimazolam or sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was PONV incidence for 24-h after surgery. Secondary outcomes comprised of PONV at 30-min post-surgery, postoperative additional antiemetic use, and Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) score at 24-h postoperatively.\n\n\nResults\nForty patients were enrolled in the study. The remimazolam group exhibited significantly lower rates of PONV for 24-h after surgery than did the sevoflurane group (remimazolam group vs. sevoflurane group; 5% vs. 45%, P = 0.003, respectively). The use of dexamethasone, a rescue antiemetic administered within 24 h of surgery, was substantially lower in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (0% in remimazolam vs. 30% in sevoflurane, P = 0.020). The QOR-15 score at 24-h after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups.\n\n\nConclusions\nCompared to sevoflurane, opting for remimazolam as an intraoperative hypnotic may decrease the incidence of PONV and reduce antiemetic use for 24 h after laparoscopic surgery.","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.23939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) refers to nausea and vomiting that occurs within 24-h after surgery or in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Previous studies have reported that the use of remimazolam, a newer benzodiazepine (BDZ) hypnotic, for anesthesia results in less PONV. In this study, we compared the rate of PONV between sevoflurane and remimazolam after general anesthesia. Methods In this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), participants aged 20-80 years who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or hemicolectomy were randomized to either the remimazolam or sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was PONV incidence for 24-h after surgery. Secondary outcomes comprised of PONV at 30-min post-surgery, postoperative additional antiemetic use, and Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) score at 24-h postoperatively. Results Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The remimazolam group exhibited significantly lower rates of PONV for 24-h after surgery than did the sevoflurane group (remimazolam group vs. sevoflurane group; 5% vs. 45%, P = 0.003, respectively). The use of dexamethasone, a rescue antiemetic administered within 24 h of surgery, was substantially lower in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (0% in remimazolam vs. 30% in sevoflurane, P = 0.020). The QOR-15 score at 24-h after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions Compared to sevoflurane, opting for remimazolam as an intraoperative hypnotic may decrease the incidence of PONV and reduce antiemetic use for 24 h after laparoscopic surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞马唑仑与七氟醚全身麻醉后恶心和呕吐的发生率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
背景术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是指手术后 24 小时内或在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)内发生的恶心和呕吐。先前的研究报告称,使用较新的苯二氮卓(BDZ)催眠药雷美马唑仑进行麻醉可减少 PONV。在这项研究中,我们比较了七氟醚和瑞马唑仑在全身麻醉后的 PONV 发生率。在这项前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)中,年龄在 20-80 岁之间、接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术或半结肠切除术的患者被随机分配到瑞马唑仑组或七氟醚组。主要结果是术后 24 小时内的 PONV 发生率。次要结果包括术后30分钟的PONV、术后追加止吐药的使用情况以及术后24小时的恢复质量-15(QOR-15)评分。术后24小时内,雷马唑仑组的PONV发生率明显低于七氟醚组(雷马唑仑组与七氟醚组的PONV发生率分别为5%与45%,P=0.003)。手术后24小时内使用地塞米松(一种抢救性止吐药)的比例在瑞马唑仑组大大低于七氟醚组(瑞马唑仑组为0%,七氟醚组为30%,P = 0.020)。结论与七氟醚相比,选择使用瑞马唑仑作为术中催眠药可降低腹腔镜手术后24小时内PONV的发生率,减少止吐药的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Controlled hypotension under rapid ventricular pacing technique in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a case report. Comparison of postoperative outcomes after cranial neurosurgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea. Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Current evidence on the use of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade antagonism during electroconvulsive therapy - a narrative review. Dexmedetomidine alleviates CoCl2-induced hypoxic cellular damage in INS-1 cells by regulating autophagy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1