Artificial Intelligence Use in Feedback: A Qualitative Analysis

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.53761/40wmcj98
Toh Yen Pang, Alex Kootsookos, Chi-Tsun Cheng
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Use in Feedback: A Qualitative Analysis","authors":"Toh Yen Pang, Alex Kootsookos, Chi-Tsun Cheng","doi":"10.53761/40wmcj98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback, particularly the formative or ‘feed-forward’ type is important for students in higher education to understand their errors and improve their expression and clarity of ideas. While technology-assisted feedback modes, e.g., audio or video are prevalent, ensuring their efficacy and succinctness, particularly for non-English-speaking background (NESB) educators can be challenging. This study investigates the attitudes and experiences of NESB educators in the School of Engineering of RMIT University, with a focus on their use of AI-assisted tools for providing feedback to students in higher education settings. Utilising a survey, the researchers examined how personal and linguistic attributes influenced feedback strategies and explored the educators' perspectives on integrating AI tools, such as ChatGPT and BARD, in their teaching practice and to enhance student engagement with the feedback they received. Through thematic analysis the findings reveal that personal background and linguistic proficiency significantly influenced the provision of feedback. Furthermore, even though educators had different levels of familiarity with AI-assisted tools, there was a general consensus on the potential utility of these tools for improving feedback provision. These will require targeted staff training, careful human oversight to ensure quality and avoid bias, and customised AI training to align feedback with individual teaching styles.","PeriodicalId":45764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53761/40wmcj98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feedback, particularly the formative or ‘feed-forward’ type is important for students in higher education to understand their errors and improve their expression and clarity of ideas. While technology-assisted feedback modes, e.g., audio or video are prevalent, ensuring their efficacy and succinctness, particularly for non-English-speaking background (NESB) educators can be challenging. This study investigates the attitudes and experiences of NESB educators in the School of Engineering of RMIT University, with a focus on their use of AI-assisted tools for providing feedback to students in higher education settings. Utilising a survey, the researchers examined how personal and linguistic attributes influenced feedback strategies and explored the educators' perspectives on integrating AI tools, such as ChatGPT and BARD, in their teaching practice and to enhance student engagement with the feedback they received. Through thematic analysis the findings reveal that personal background and linguistic proficiency significantly influenced the provision of feedback. Furthermore, even though educators had different levels of familiarity with AI-assisted tools, there was a general consensus on the potential utility of these tools for improving feedback provision. These will require targeted staff training, careful human oversight to ensure quality and avoid bias, and customised AI training to align feedback with individual teaching styles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在反馈中的应用:定性分析
反馈,尤其是形成性反馈或 "前馈 "式反馈,对于高校学生了解自己的错误、提高表达能力和思路清晰度非常重要。虽然音频或视频等技术辅助反馈模式非常普遍,但确保其有效性和简洁性,特别是对于非英语背景(NESB)的教育工作者来说,可能具有挑战性。本研究调查了皇家墨尔本理工大学工程学院的非英语背景教育工作者的态度和经验,重点是他们在高等教育环境中使用人工智能辅助工具向学生提供反馈的情况。通过调查,研究人员研究了个人和语言属性对反馈策略的影响,并探讨了教育工作者对将 ChatGPT 和 BARD 等人工智能工具整合到教学实践中并提高学生对反馈的参与度的看法。通过主题分析,研究结果表明,个人背景和语言能力对提供反馈有着重要影响。此外,尽管教育工作者对人工智能辅助工具的熟悉程度不同,但大家普遍认为这些工具对改进反馈的提供具有潜在的作用。这些都需要对员工进行有针对性的培训、认真的人工监督以确保质量和避免偏见,以及定制的人工智能培训,使反馈符合个人的教学风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice aims to add significantly to the body of knowledge describing effective and innovative teaching and learning practice in higher education.The Journal is a forum for educational practitioners across a wide range of disciplines. Its purpose is to facilitate the communication of teaching and learning outcomes in a scholarly way, bridging the gap between journals covering purely academic research and articles and opinions published without peer review.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Intensive modes of teaching, past, present, and future Editorial: More Practical Gender Research is Needed in Higher Education Leadership and Management What Exactly is Peer Learning? An Exploratory Analysis of Student Class Interaction Reframing Professional Identity: Professional Development Framework for Learning/Educational Designers Perceptions and Experiences of Academic Advisers and Minoritised Students at a UK University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1