Volatile compounds for discrimination between beef, pork, and their admixture using SPME-GC-MS and chemometrics analysis

IF 4.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Science of Animal Resources Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.5851/kosfa.2024.e32
Z. Ahamed, Jin-kyu Seo, Jeong-Uk Eom, Han-Sul Yang
{"title":"Volatile compounds for discrimination between beef, pork, and their\n admixture using SPME-GC-MS and chemometrics analysis","authors":"Z. Ahamed, Jin-kyu Seo, Jeong-Uk Eom, Han-Sul Yang","doi":"10.5851/kosfa.2024.e32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"27 This study addresses the prevalent issue of meat species authentication and adulteration 28 through a chemometrics-based approach, crucial for upholding public health and ensuring a 29 fair marketplace. Volatile compounds were extracted and analyzed using headspace-solid-30 phase-microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). 31 Adulterated meat samples were effectively identified through principal component analysis 32 (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Through variable importance 33 in projection (VIP) scores and a Random Forest test, 11 key compounds, including nonanal, 34 octanal, hexadecanal, benzaldehyde, 1-octanol, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, 35 and 2-acetylpyrrole for beef, and hexanal and 1-octen-3-ol for pork, were robustly identified 36 as biomarkers. These compounds exhibited a discernible trend in adulterated samples based on 37 adulteration ratios, evident in a heatmap. Notably, lipid degradation compounds strongly 38 influenced meat discrimination. PCA and PLS-DA yielded significant sample separation, with 39 the first two components capturing 80% and 72.1% of total variance, respectively. This 40 technique could be a reliable method for detecting meat adulteration in cooked meat. 41","PeriodicalId":12459,"journal":{"name":"Food Science of Animal Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science of Animal Resources","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2024.e32","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

27 This study addresses the prevalent issue of meat species authentication and adulteration 28 through a chemometrics-based approach, crucial for upholding public health and ensuring a 29 fair marketplace. Volatile compounds were extracted and analyzed using headspace-solid-30 phase-microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). 31 Adulterated meat samples were effectively identified through principal component analysis 32 (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Through variable importance 33 in projection (VIP) scores and a Random Forest test, 11 key compounds, including nonanal, 34 octanal, hexadecanal, benzaldehyde, 1-octanol, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, 35 and 2-acetylpyrrole for beef, and hexanal and 1-octen-3-ol for pork, were robustly identified 36 as biomarkers. These compounds exhibited a discernible trend in adulterated samples based on 37 adulteration ratios, evident in a heatmap. Notably, lipid degradation compounds strongly 38 influenced meat discrimination. PCA and PLS-DA yielded significant sample separation, with 39 the first two components capturing 80% and 72.1% of total variance, respectively. This 40 technique could be a reliable method for detecting meat adulteration in cooked meat. 41
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 SPME-GC-MS 和化学计量学分析鉴别牛肉、猪肉及其混合物中的挥发性化合物
27 本研究通过基于化学计量学的方法解决了肉类品种鉴别和掺假 28 这一普遍存在的问题,这对维护公众健康和确保市场公平至关重要 29。采用顶空-固相-微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法(HS-SPME-GC-MS)提取和分析挥发性化合物。31 通过主成分分析(PCA)32 和偏最小二乘法判别分析(PLS-DA),有效识别了掺假肉类样品。通过变量重要性 33 预测(VIP)得分和随机森林测试,11 种关键化合物,包括牛肉中的壬醛、34 十八醛、十六醛、苯甲醛、1-辛醇、己酸、庚酸、辛酸、35 和 2-乙酰基吡咯,以及猪肉中的己醛和 1-辛烯-3-醇,被确定为生物标记物 36。根据 37 掺假比率,这些化合物在掺假样品中呈现出明显的趋势,这在热图中很明显。值得注意的是,脂质降解化合物强烈影响肉类 38 的鉴别。PCA 和 PLS-DA 可显著分离样品,39 前两个成分分别占总方差的 80% 和 72.1%。40 该技术可作为检测熟肉中肉类掺假的可靠方法。41
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science of Animal Resources
Food Science of Animal Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Food Science of Animal Resources (Food Sci. Anim. Resour.) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research and review articles on scientific and technological aspects of chemistry, biotechnology, processing, engineering, and microbiology of meat, egg, dairy, and edible insect/worm products.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Muscle Fiber and Meat Quality Characteristics of Beef Strip Loin, Tenderloin, and Round Cuts among Jeju Black Cattle, Hanwoo, and Their Crossbreeds. Comparison of Soy and Pea Protein for Cultured Meat Scaffolds: Evaluating Gelation, Physical Properties, and Cell Adhesion. Development and Comparative Evaluation of Imitated Fiber from Different Protein Sources Using Wet-Spinning. Effect of Chicken Age on Proliferation and Differentiation Abilities of Muscle Stem Cells and Nutritional Characteristics of Cultured Meat Tissue. Psychrotrophic Bacteria Threatening the Safety of Animal-Derived Foods: Characteristics, Contamination, and Control Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1