Z. Ahamed, Jin-kyu Seo, Jeong-Uk Eom, Han-Sul Yang
{"title":"Volatile compounds for discrimination between beef, pork, and their\n admixture using SPME-GC-MS and chemometrics analysis","authors":"Z. Ahamed, Jin-kyu Seo, Jeong-Uk Eom, Han-Sul Yang","doi":"10.5851/kosfa.2024.e32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"27 This study addresses the prevalent issue of meat species authentication and adulteration 28 through a chemometrics-based approach, crucial for upholding public health and ensuring a 29 fair marketplace. Volatile compounds were extracted and analyzed using headspace-solid-30 phase-microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). 31 Adulterated meat samples were effectively identified through principal component analysis 32 (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Through variable importance 33 in projection (VIP) scores and a Random Forest test, 11 key compounds, including nonanal, 34 octanal, hexadecanal, benzaldehyde, 1-octanol, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, 35 and 2-acetylpyrrole for beef, and hexanal and 1-octen-3-ol for pork, were robustly identified 36 as biomarkers. These compounds exhibited a discernible trend in adulterated samples based on 37 adulteration ratios, evident in a heatmap. Notably, lipid degradation compounds strongly 38 influenced meat discrimination. PCA and PLS-DA yielded significant sample separation, with 39 the first two components capturing 80% and 72.1% of total variance, respectively. This 40 technique could be a reliable method for detecting meat adulteration in cooked meat. 41","PeriodicalId":12459,"journal":{"name":"Food Science of Animal Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science of Animal Resources","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2024.e32","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
27 This study addresses the prevalent issue of meat species authentication and adulteration 28 through a chemometrics-based approach, crucial for upholding public health and ensuring a 29 fair marketplace. Volatile compounds were extracted and analyzed using headspace-solid-30 phase-microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). 31 Adulterated meat samples were effectively identified through principal component analysis 32 (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Through variable importance 33 in projection (VIP) scores and a Random Forest test, 11 key compounds, including nonanal, 34 octanal, hexadecanal, benzaldehyde, 1-octanol, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, 35 and 2-acetylpyrrole for beef, and hexanal and 1-octen-3-ol for pork, were robustly identified 36 as biomarkers. These compounds exhibited a discernible trend in adulterated samples based on 37 adulteration ratios, evident in a heatmap. Notably, lipid degradation compounds strongly 38 influenced meat discrimination. PCA and PLS-DA yielded significant sample separation, with 39 the first two components capturing 80% and 72.1% of total variance, respectively. This 40 technique could be a reliable method for detecting meat adulteration in cooked meat. 41
期刊介绍:
Food Science of Animal Resources (Food Sci. Anim. Resour.) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research and review articles on scientific and technological aspects of chemistry, biotechnology, processing, engineering, and microbiology of meat, egg, dairy, and edible insect/worm products.