Gender Identity in the 2021 Census of England and Wales: How a Flawed Question Created Spurious Data

Michael Biggs
{"title":"Gender Identity in the 2021 Census of England and Wales: How a Flawed Question Created Spurious Data","authors":"Michael Biggs","doi":"10.1177/00380385241240441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2021 Census of England and Wales was one of the first in the world to ascertain the gender identity of an entire population. This article argues that its results are implausible with regard to geography, language, education, ethnicity, and religion. The results contradict data on referrals to gender clinics and signatures on a pro-transgender petition. The results are also internally inconsistent when the various categories of gender identity are correlated across localities, and when compared with sexual orientation. The spurious results were produced by a flawed question, which originated with a transgender campaigning organization. The question evidently confused a substantial number of respondents who erroneously declared their gender identity to differ from their natal sex. Confusion is manifested in the overrepresentation of people lacking English proficiency in the most suspect gender categories. These findings demonstrate how a faulty question can distort our apprehension of the social world.","PeriodicalId":510517,"journal":{"name":"Sociology","volume":" 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241240441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2021 Census of England and Wales was one of the first in the world to ascertain the gender identity of an entire population. This article argues that its results are implausible with regard to geography, language, education, ethnicity, and religion. The results contradict data on referrals to gender clinics and signatures on a pro-transgender petition. The results are also internally inconsistent when the various categories of gender identity are correlated across localities, and when compared with sexual orientation. The spurious results were produced by a flawed question, which originated with a transgender campaigning organization. The question evidently confused a substantial number of respondents who erroneously declared their gender identity to differ from their natal sex. Confusion is manifested in the overrepresentation of people lacking English proficiency in the most suspect gender categories. These findings demonstrate how a faulty question can distort our apprehension of the social world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021 年英格兰和威尔士人口普查中的性别认同问题:有缺陷的问题如何产生虚假数据
2021 年英格兰和威尔士人口普查是世界上首次确定全体人口性别身份的普查之一。这篇文章认为,在地理、语言、教育、种族和宗教方面,普查结果难以置信。结果与性别诊所的转诊数据和支持变性请愿书的签名数据相矛盾。当不同地区的性别认同类别相互关联时,以及与性取向进行比较时,结果也不一致。产生这些虚假结果的原因是一个有缺陷的问题,该问题源自一个跨性别运动组织。这个问题显然混淆了相当多的受访者,他们错误地宣称自己的性别认同与其出生性别不同。混淆表现在缺乏英语能力的人在最可疑的性别类别中所占比例过高。这些发现表明,一个错误的问题会如何扭曲我们对社会世界的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Men, Intimate Connections and the Timing of Fatherhood: Conceptualising ‘Misconnect’ within the Sociology of Personal Life ‘A Home Away from Home’: Space, Ritual and Performance at an Elite Boys’ School in England The Fate of Being a ‘Distressed Asset’: Insights into Women Returners’ Experiences in the UK Upward Mobility and Class Inequities among Filipino Migrant Nurses in the Republic of Ireland Appearance and Social Inequalities: Physical Attractiveness as a Part of Occupation-Congruent Appearance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1