Liana Kinjrawi, Anas Abdo, Amirah Alnour, Hassan Achour, Mohamad Salem Rekab
{"title":"Post-endodontic pain in curved canals prepared with different rotary instrumentation techniques: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Liana Kinjrawi, Anas Abdo, Amirah Alnour, Hassan Achour, Mohamad Salem Rekab","doi":"10.17219/dmp/155105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nCurved root canals are associated with the highest number of procedural errors during endodontic instrumentation. Recently, numerous rotary instruments have been developed, with both manual and automated mechanisms, to facilitate endodontic treatment and manage the complications related to it.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThe aim of the study was to assess post-endodontic pain after using the HyFlex® EDM OneFile (HEDM), WaveOne® Gold (WOG) and XP-endo® Shaper (XPS) systems in the preparation of curved canals in patients with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nA total of 45 molars with curved canals and asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis were randomly divided into 3 equal groups based on the instrumentation used: HEDM (group A); WOG (group B); and XPS (group C). All teeth were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions. Postendodontic pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 h after root canal instrumentation. The data was analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the paired-samples t test with the Bonferroni correction, with a p-value of 0.05 set for statistical significance.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe highest levels of post-endodontic pain were recorded at 6 h after treatment. Then, the values gradually decreased until the pain nearly vanished after 72 h. No statistically significant differences were observed in the VAS scores between groups A and B. At the same time, group C showed the lowest VAS scores at all follow-up time points.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe use of the XPS system resulted in the lowest pain scores at all follow-ups. The HEDM and WOG groups showed no differences in the pain scores throughout the whole follow-up period.","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/155105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Curved root canals are associated with the highest number of procedural errors during endodontic instrumentation. Recently, numerous rotary instruments have been developed, with both manual and automated mechanisms, to facilitate endodontic treatment and manage the complications related to it.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the study was to assess post-endodontic pain after using the HyFlex® EDM OneFile (HEDM), WaveOne® Gold (WOG) and XP-endo® Shaper (XPS) systems in the preparation of curved canals in patients with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A total of 45 molars with curved canals and asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis were randomly divided into 3 equal groups based on the instrumentation used: HEDM (group A); WOG (group B); and XPS (group C). All teeth were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions. Postendodontic pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 h after root canal instrumentation. The data was analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the paired-samples t test with the Bonferroni correction, with a p-value of 0.05 set for statistical significance.
RESULTS
The highest levels of post-endodontic pain were recorded at 6 h after treatment. Then, the values gradually decreased until the pain nearly vanished after 72 h. No statistically significant differences were observed in the VAS scores between groups A and B. At the same time, group C showed the lowest VAS scores at all follow-up time points.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of the XPS system resulted in the lowest pain scores at all follow-ups. The HEDM and WOG groups showed no differences in the pain scores throughout the whole follow-up period.