Hydrogen Injection Position Impact: Experimental Analysis of Central Direct Injection and Side Direct Injection in Engines

IF 1.1 Q3 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY SAE International Journal of Engines Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.4271/03-17-05-0038
Mohamed Mohamed, Milad Mirshahi, Changzhao Jiang, Hua Zhao, A. Harrington, J. Hall
{"title":"Hydrogen Injection Position Impact: Experimental Analysis of Central\n Direct Injection and Side Direct Injection in Engines","authors":"Mohamed Mohamed, Milad Mirshahi, Changzhao Jiang, Hua Zhao, A. Harrington, J. Hall","doi":"10.4271/03-17-05-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A detailed investigation was carried out on the performance, combustion, and\n emissions of a single-cylinder direct injection hydrogen spark ignition (SI)\n engine with either a side-mounted direct injection (SDI) or a centrally\n installed direct injection (CDI) injector.\n\n \nThe first part of the study analyzed the performance and emissions\n characteristics of CDI and SDI engine operations with different injection\n timings and pressures. This was followed by comparing the engine’s performance\n and emissions of the CDI and SDI operations at different engine speeds and\n relative air-to-fuel ratios (lambda) with the optimized injection pressure and\n timings. Furthermore, the performance and emission attributes of the hydrogen\n engine with the CDI and SDI setups were conducted at a fixed λ value of 2.75\n across a broad spectrum of engine loads.\n\n \nThe study’s main outcome demonstrates that both direct injection systems produced\n near-zero CO2, CO, and HC emissions. Stable engine operations could\n be achieved over a wide range of air-to-fuel ratios by the CDI and SDI setups,\n though the CDI enabled a wider range from stoichiometric to lambda = 3.8. The\n CDI system also offered noticeably higher thermal efficiencies than the SDI\n engine. The study also illustrated the sensitivity of each injection system to\n the variation of the injection pressure and timing and identified the optimum\n operation settings for each system. Finally, the study indicates that the\n emissions characteristics of CDI and SDI are similar at low and mid-load,\n although SDI resulted in both higher NOx and hydrogen emissions than CDI.","PeriodicalId":47948,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Engines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Engines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-05-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A detailed investigation was carried out on the performance, combustion, and emissions of a single-cylinder direct injection hydrogen spark ignition (SI) engine with either a side-mounted direct injection (SDI) or a centrally installed direct injection (CDI) injector. The first part of the study analyzed the performance and emissions characteristics of CDI and SDI engine operations with different injection timings and pressures. This was followed by comparing the engine’s performance and emissions of the CDI and SDI operations at different engine speeds and relative air-to-fuel ratios (lambda) with the optimized injection pressure and timings. Furthermore, the performance and emission attributes of the hydrogen engine with the CDI and SDI setups were conducted at a fixed λ value of 2.75 across a broad spectrum of engine loads. The study’s main outcome demonstrates that both direct injection systems produced near-zero CO2, CO, and HC emissions. Stable engine operations could be achieved over a wide range of air-to-fuel ratios by the CDI and SDI setups, though the CDI enabled a wider range from stoichiometric to lambda = 3.8. The CDI system also offered noticeably higher thermal efficiencies than the SDI engine. The study also illustrated the sensitivity of each injection system to the variation of the injection pressure and timing and identified the optimum operation settings for each system. Finally, the study indicates that the emissions characteristics of CDI and SDI are similar at low and mid-load, although SDI resulted in both higher NOx and hydrogen emissions than CDI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氢气喷射位置的影响:发动机中央直喷和侧喷的实验分析
对采用侧置直喷(SDI)或中央直喷(CDI)喷射器的单缸直喷式氢气火花点火(SI)发动机的性能、燃烧和排放情况进行了详细调查。研究的第一部分分析了 CDI 和 SDI 发动机在不同喷射时间和压力下的性能和排放特性。随后,比较了在不同发动机转速和相对空燃比(λ)条件下,采用优化喷射压力和时间的 CDI 和 SDI 发动机的性能和排放。此外,在固定 λ 值为 2.75 的条件下,在广泛的发动机负荷范围内,采用 CDI 和 SDI 设置的氢气发动机的性能和排放属性也得到了验证。研究的主要结果表明,两种直喷系统都能产生接近零的 CO2、CO 和 HC 排放。CDI 和 SDI 设置可在广泛的空燃比范围内实现稳定的发动机运行,但 CDI 可实现从静态到 lambda = 3.8 的更大范围。CDI 系统的热效率也明显高于 SDI 发动机。研究还说明了每种喷射系统对喷射压力和正时变化的敏感性,并确定了每种系统的最佳操作设置。最后,研究表明,CDI 和 SDI 在中低负荷时的排放特性相似,但 SDI 的氮氧化物和氢排放均高于 CDI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Engines
SAE International Journal of Engines TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Combustion Mode Evaluation of a Methanol–Diesel Dual Direct Injection Engine with a Control of Injection Timing and Energy Substitution Ratio An Investigation on Exhaust Pulse Characteristics of Asymmetric Twin-Scroll Turbocharged Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Optimizing Spark-Ignition Engine Performance with Ternary Blend Fuels and Hybrid Nanolubricants: A Response Surface Methodology Study Simulation Studies of Pollutant Emission from Passenger Cars Cavitation Phenomenon and Spray Atomization in Different Types of Diesel Engine Nozzles: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1