The Co-Parenting Across Family Structures Scale: Replication for Mandarin parents

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Family Process Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1111/famp.12997
Marsha Kline Pruett, Xiying Wang, Tianmei Zhu, Jonathan Alschech, Michael Saini
{"title":"The Co-Parenting Across Family Structures Scale: Replication for Mandarin parents","authors":"Marsha Kline Pruett,&nbsp;Xiying Wang,&nbsp;Tianmei Zhu,&nbsp;Jonathan Alschech,&nbsp;Michael Saini","doi":"10.1111/famp.12997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Co-parenting, the undertaking of parents working together to raise their children, is well documented as an important consideration of children's adjustment in Western countries, but we know less about the role of co-parenting in other cultures. In China, for example, co-parenting has only recently emerged in the social science literature. This study aimed to examine the cultural sensitivity of the CoPAFS instrument among Chinese Mandarin-speaking parents. CoPAFS is a 27-item survey designed to assess co-parenting across married and unmarried family structures originally developed in English. Data were collected from 729 Chinese-speaking and 348 English-speaking respondents. Factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the overall model fit for the translated co-parenting measure was acceptable in Mandarin. However, the five CoPAFS subscales (trust, respect, communication, acrimony, and value) differed across comparison groups, with communication notable for its lack of endorsement among Chinese couples. Implications of measuring co-parenting within Chinese families are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.12997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-parenting, the undertaking of parents working together to raise their children, is well documented as an important consideration of children's adjustment in Western countries, but we know less about the role of co-parenting in other cultures. In China, for example, co-parenting has only recently emerged in the social science literature. This study aimed to examine the cultural sensitivity of the CoPAFS instrument among Chinese Mandarin-speaking parents. CoPAFS is a 27-item survey designed to assess co-parenting across married and unmarried family structures originally developed in English. Data were collected from 729 Chinese-speaking and 348 English-speaking respondents. Factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the overall model fit for the translated co-parenting measure was acceptable in Mandarin. However, the five CoPAFS subscales (trust, respect, communication, acrimony, and value) differed across comparison groups, with communication notable for its lack of endorsement among Chinese couples. Implications of measuring co-parenting within Chinese families are offered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨家庭结构共育量表:针对普通话父母的复制。
在西方国家,父母共同养育子女是儿童适应社会的一个重要考虑因素,有大量文献对此进行了记载,但我们对其他文化中父母共同养育子女的作用却知之甚少。例如,在中国,共同养育子女最近才出现在社会科学文献中。本研究旨在考察 CoPAFS 工具在讲普通话的中国父母中的文化敏感性。CoPAFS 是一项包含 27 个项目的调查,旨在评估已婚和未婚家庭结构中的共同养育问题。我们从 729 名华语受访者和 348 名英语受访者中收集了数据。因子分析和确认性因子分析表明,翻译成普通话的共同养育测量的整体模型拟合度是可以接受的。然而,CoPAFS 的五个分量表(信任、尊重、沟通、争吵和价值)在不同的比较组中存在差异,其中沟通在中国夫妇中缺乏认可度。本文提出了在中国家庭中测量共同养育的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The family alliance as a facilitator of therapeutic change in systemic relational psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A case study A latent profile analysis of relationship satisfaction and self-regulation among low-income participants who attended relationship education with a partner. Within-family processes among safety nets, maternal parenting stress, and child behavioral problems among low-income families: The importance of race and ethnicity. Hopelessness for family members of individuals with borderline personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1