Physical functional capacity assessment in children with chronic kidney disease: A cross sectional observational study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical nephrology Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.5414/CN111295
Himani Goswami, Harda H. Shah, K. Vala, Shahenaz F. Kapadia, Bharat Tiwari, Anshuman Saha
{"title":"Physical functional capacity assessment in children with chronic kidney disease: A cross sectional observational study.","authors":"Himani Goswami, Harda H. Shah, K. Vala, Shahenaz F. Kapadia, Bharat Tiwari, Anshuman Saha","doi":"10.5414/CN111295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nChronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to reduced muscle mass and strength in children resulting in a decrease in functional capacity. The objectives of this cross-sectional observational study were to evaluate and compare the functional capacity and muscle strength in children with CKD stage I - V (group A), on dialysis (stage VD) (group B), and kidney transplant recipients (KTR) (group C) in Indian children.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n60 children, 20 each in groups A, B, and C were enrolled. Children who could not do the tests and transplant recipients within 6 months of transplantation were excluded. Functional capacity and muscle strength were assessed by 6-minute walk distance (SMWD), timed floor-to-stand test (TFTS), and hand grip strength (HGS).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean age of the group was 12.54 ± 2.96 years. Among groups A, B, and C, the SMWD in meters (465.90 ± 68.85, 381.45 ± 50.88, 509.05 ± 43.37), TFTS in seconds (9.93 ± 1.77, 10.36 ± 1.30, and 7.68 ± 0.76), and HGS in kg were (12.7 ± 3.85, 10.4 ± 3.02, 19.75 ± 4.45), respectively (p < 0.001). Group C had the best physical functional capacity. The SMWD and HGS had a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.658, 0.658, respectively), and TFTS had a negative correlation (r = -0.605) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The mean HGS and TFTS were different between groups A, C, and B, C (p < 0.05) and not between A and B. The SMWT was however different between A, B, and C (p < 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nMuscle strength and functional capacity were most impaired in Indian children on hemodialysis and best preserved in KTR.","PeriodicalId":10396,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nephrology","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to reduced muscle mass and strength in children resulting in a decrease in functional capacity. The objectives of this cross-sectional observational study were to evaluate and compare the functional capacity and muscle strength in children with CKD stage I - V (group A), on dialysis (stage VD) (group B), and kidney transplant recipients (KTR) (group C) in Indian children. MATERIALS AND METHODS 60 children, 20 each in groups A, B, and C were enrolled. Children who could not do the tests and transplant recipients within 6 months of transplantation were excluded. Functional capacity and muscle strength were assessed by 6-minute walk distance (SMWD), timed floor-to-stand test (TFTS), and hand grip strength (HGS). RESULTS The mean age of the group was 12.54 ± 2.96 years. Among groups A, B, and C, the SMWD in meters (465.90 ± 68.85, 381.45 ± 50.88, 509.05 ± 43.37), TFTS in seconds (9.93 ± 1.77, 10.36 ± 1.30, and 7.68 ± 0.76), and HGS in kg were (12.7 ± 3.85, 10.4 ± 3.02, 19.75 ± 4.45), respectively (p < 0.001). Group C had the best physical functional capacity. The SMWD and HGS had a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.658, 0.658, respectively), and TFTS had a negative correlation (r = -0.605) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The mean HGS and TFTS were different between groups A, C, and B, C (p < 0.05) and not between A and B. The SMWT was however different between A, B, and C (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Muscle strength and functional capacity were most impaired in Indian children on hemodialysis and best preserved in KTR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性肾病患儿的身体机能评估:横断面观察研究
背景:慢性肾脏病(CKD)会导致儿童肌肉质量和力量下降,进而降低功能能力。这项横断面观察性研究旨在评估和比较印度儿童中 CKD I - V 期(A 组)、透析期(VD 期)(B 组)和肾移植受者(KTR)(C 组)的功能能力和肌肉力量。无法进行测试的儿童和移植后 6 个月内的移植受者被排除在外。功能能力和肌肉力量通过 6 分钟步行距离(SMWD)、定时从地面到站立测试(TFTS)和手握力(HGS)进行评估。 结果该组平均年龄为(12.54 ± 2.96)岁。A、B、C三组的SMWD(米)(465.90±68.85、381.45±50.88、509.05±43.37)、TFTS(秒)(9.93±1.77、10.36±1.30、7.68±0.76)和HGS(公斤)分别为(12.7±3.85、10.4±3.02、19.75±4.45)(P<0.001)。C 组的身体功能能力最好。SMWD和HGS与估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)呈中度正相关(r = 0.658,0.658),TFTS与估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)呈负相关(r = -0.605)。A 组、C 组和 B 组、C 组之间的平均 HGS 和 TFTS 有差异(p < 0.05),而 A 组和 B 组之间则没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nephrology
Clinical nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nephrology appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: prophylaxis, pathophysiology, immunology, diagnosis, therapy, experimental approaches and dialysis and transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the status and associated factors of stigma in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Human albumin infusion and risk of acute kidney injury in adults with nephrotic syndrome due to minimal change disease: A single-center retrospective study. Construction and validation of a survival prognostic model for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. A hemodialysis patient unable to walk - brown tumor as the culprit: Case report and review of the literature. B cell-driven reduced-dose rituximab as induction therapy for 2 patients with ANCA-associated renal vasculitis: A case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1