'Two heads are better than one.' - exploring the experiences of Ghanaian communities on the role and effect of Patient-Public Engagement in Health System Improvement.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health policy and planning Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1093/heapol/czae029
Adam Fusheini, S. Ankomah, Sarah Derrett
{"title":"'Two heads are better than one.' - exploring the experiences of Ghanaian communities on the role and effect of Patient-Public Engagement in Health System Improvement.","authors":"Adam Fusheini, S. Ankomah, Sarah Derrett","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient and Public Participation (PPP) is key to improving health systems. Yet, studies have shown that PPP implementations across many countries have been largely tokenistic. Particularly, in Ghana, whilst PPP is prioritised in national health policies and legislation, there appears to be little research focused on understanding PPP's role in health system improvement. The aim of this study, therefore, is to examine how PPP is working across the Ghanaian health system levels, as well as to understand the perspectives and experiences of participants on how PPP contributes to health system improvement. The qualitative study was undertaken in six communities in three districts in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Data were collected from semi-structured individual interviews. The selection of participants was purposive, based on their PPP-related roles. As a result, findings of this study may not reflect the experiences of others who are not directly involved in PPP initiatives. Thirty-five participants, mainly health service users and health professionals, were interviewed. Data were transcribed and analysed descriptively using Braun and Clarke's 2006 thematic analysis approach. Overall, participants noted PPP implementation was largely limited at higher health system levels (i.e. national, regional and district levels), but was functioning at the community level. PPP also improved access to health services, responsiveness to patient needs, community-health worker relationships, health-seeking behaviours, empowered healthcare users, and improved health outcomes. The study, therefore, recommended the need to undertake PPP across all levels of the health system to maximise PPP's role in health system improvement. Finally, the study suggested prioritising PPP, especially for resource-poor countries to complement government's efforts in improving accessibility of healthcare services to many communities and also provide a more patient-centred healthcare system responsive to patients' and public needs.","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient and Public Participation (PPP) is key to improving health systems. Yet, studies have shown that PPP implementations across many countries have been largely tokenistic. Particularly, in Ghana, whilst PPP is prioritised in national health policies and legislation, there appears to be little research focused on understanding PPP's role in health system improvement. The aim of this study, therefore, is to examine how PPP is working across the Ghanaian health system levels, as well as to understand the perspectives and experiences of participants on how PPP contributes to health system improvement. The qualitative study was undertaken in six communities in three districts in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Data were collected from semi-structured individual interviews. The selection of participants was purposive, based on their PPP-related roles. As a result, findings of this study may not reflect the experiences of others who are not directly involved in PPP initiatives. Thirty-five participants, mainly health service users and health professionals, were interviewed. Data were transcribed and analysed descriptively using Braun and Clarke's 2006 thematic analysis approach. Overall, participants noted PPP implementation was largely limited at higher health system levels (i.e. national, regional and district levels), but was functioning at the community level. PPP also improved access to health services, responsiveness to patient needs, community-health worker relationships, health-seeking behaviours, empowered healthcare users, and improved health outcomes. The study, therefore, recommended the need to undertake PPP across all levels of the health system to maximise PPP's role in health system improvement. Finally, the study suggested prioritising PPP, especially for resource-poor countries to complement government's efforts in improving accessibility of healthcare services to many communities and also provide a more patient-centred healthcare system responsive to patients' and public needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个臭皮匠顶个诸葛亮。- 探究加纳社区关于患者-公众参与在卫生系统改进中的作用和效果的经验。
患者和公众参与(PPP)是改善医疗系统的关键。然而,研究表明,许多国家的公私伙伴关系实施在很大程度上都是象征性的。特别是在加纳,虽然 PPP 在国家卫生政策和立法中被列为优先事项,但似乎很少有研究侧重于了解 PPP 在卫生系统改进中的作用。因此,本研究旨在探讨公私伙伴关系如何在加纳卫生系统的各个层面发挥作用,并了解参与者对公私伙伴关系如何促进卫生系统改善的看法和经验。定性研究在加纳阿散蒂地区三个区的六个社区进行。通过半结构化的个人访谈收集数据。根据参与者与公私伙伴关系相关的角色,有目的地选择参与者。因此,本研究的结果可能无法反映其他未直接参与公私伙伴关系倡议的人的经验。35 名参与者接受了访谈,他们主要是医疗服务使用者和医疗专业人员。采用 Braun 和 Clarke 2006 年的主题分析方法对数据进行了转录和描述性分析。总体而言,参与者注意到公私伙伴关系的实施在较高的卫生系统层面(即国家、区域和地区层面)受到很大限制,但在社区层面正在发挥作用。公私伙伴关系还改善了医疗服务的获取、对病人需求的响应、社区与卫生工作者的关系、求医行为、增强了医疗用户的能力,并改善了医疗成果。因此,该研究建议有必要在卫生系统的各个层面开展公私伙伴关系,以最大限度地发挥公私伙伴关系在改善卫生系统方面的作用。最后,研究建议优先考虑公私伙伴关系,特别是对于资源贫乏的国家,以补充政府在改善许多社区医疗服务可及性方面所做的努力,并提供一个更加以病人为中心、满足病人和公众需求的医疗系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
期刊最新文献
Validity of a visual analogue scale to measure and value the perceived level of sanitation - evidence from Ghana and Mozambique. Care seeking during pregnancy: testing the assumptions behind Service Delivery Reform for Maternal and Newborn Health in rural Kenya. Organizational resilience and primary care nurses' work conditions and wellbeing: a multilevel empirical study in China. Examining sustained sub-national health system development: experience from the Western Cape province, South Africa, 1994-2016. Beliefs of Pentecostal pastors concerning the use of antiretroviral treatment among Pentecostal Christians living with HIV in a suburb of Cape Town-South Africa: a community health systems lens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1