Earthquake simulator testing of a three-story steel building for evaluating built-up box column performance and effect of sliding slab

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4130
Chung-Che Chou, Huang-Zuo Lin, Alvaro Córdova, Jian-Ming Chen, Daniel Yen-Hsun Chou, Shu-Hsien Chao, Shih-Ho Chao, Georgios Tsampras, Chia-Ming Uang, Hsin-Yang Chung, Chin-Hsiung Loh, Hsuan-Teh Hu
{"title":"Earthquake simulator testing of a three-story steel building for evaluating built-up box column performance and effect of sliding slab","authors":"Chung-Che Chou,&nbsp;Huang-Zuo Lin,&nbsp;Alvaro Córdova,&nbsp;Jian-Ming Chen,&nbsp;Daniel Yen-Hsun Chou,&nbsp;Shu-Hsien Chao,&nbsp;Shih-Ho Chao,&nbsp;Georgios Tsampras,&nbsp;Chia-Ming Uang,&nbsp;Hsin-Yang Chung,&nbsp;Chin-Hsiung Loh,&nbsp;Hsuan-Teh Hu","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The width-thickness requirement for highly ductile built-up box columns in AISC 341-22 is conservative when comparing the hysteretic responses of highly ductile box columns and I-shaped columns. This study aimed to assess the seismic performance of moderately ductile box columns in a 3-story steel dual frame with a buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF) and a special moment frame (SMF). The frame specimen was configured in phase 1 testing to allow the slabs to slide relative to the steel frame; Teflon pads were provided between the slabs and steel beams, and horizontal buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) were installed between the slabs and steel beams. In phase 2, the horizontal BRBs were replaced by rigid links such that the frame specimen simulated a conventional construction. Two phases with 17 shake table tests were conducted on the frame specimen. A near-fault motion record, obtained from the 2022 Chihshang earthquake, was used as an input motion. In phase 1, test results showed that the slab sliding system was effective in reducing the floor acceleration by 25% when compared to the rigid slab frame system. In phase 2, the base of moderately ductile built-up box columns still performed well without local buckling even when the interstory drift angle reached 0.045 rad. Postearthquake tests were conducted on the all-steel, first-story BRB that was removed from the building specimen after all shake table tests. A higher-mode buckling of the core plate was observed at both ends of the core, causing a minor strength increase at the end of the test.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The width-thickness requirement for highly ductile built-up box columns in AISC 341-22 is conservative when comparing the hysteretic responses of highly ductile box columns and I-shaped columns. This study aimed to assess the seismic performance of moderately ductile box columns in a 3-story steel dual frame with a buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF) and a special moment frame (SMF). The frame specimen was configured in phase 1 testing to allow the slabs to slide relative to the steel frame; Teflon pads were provided between the slabs and steel beams, and horizontal buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) were installed between the slabs and steel beams. In phase 2, the horizontal BRBs were replaced by rigid links such that the frame specimen simulated a conventional construction. Two phases with 17 shake table tests were conducted on the frame specimen. A near-fault motion record, obtained from the 2022 Chihshang earthquake, was used as an input motion. In phase 1, test results showed that the slab sliding system was effective in reducing the floor acceleration by 25% when compared to the rigid slab frame system. In phase 2, the base of moderately ductile built-up box columns still performed well without local buckling even when the interstory drift angle reached 0.045 rad. Postearthquake tests were conducted on the all-steel, first-story BRB that was removed from the building specimen after all shake table tests. A higher-mode buckling of the core plate was observed at both ends of the core, causing a minor strength increase at the end of the test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三层钢结构建筑的地震模拟器测试,用于评估内置箱形柱的性能和滑动板的影响
在比较高延性箱形柱和工字形柱的滞回响应时,AISC 341-22 中对高延性内置箱形柱的宽度-厚度要求是保守的。本研究旨在评估中等韧性箱形柱在三层钢双层框架(带屈曲约束支撑框架(BRBF)和特殊力矩框架(SMF))中的抗震性能。在第 1 阶段测试中,框架试样的配置允许楼板相对于钢框架滑动;在楼板和钢梁之间安装了聚四氟乙烯垫,并在楼板和钢梁之间安装了水平屈曲约束支撑(BRB)。在第 2 阶段,用刚性连接取代了水平屈曲约束支撑,使框架试样模拟传统结构。对框架试样进行了两个阶段共 17 次振动台试验。输入运动采用了 2022 年池上地震的近断层运动记录。第一阶段的测试结果表明,与刚性楼板框架系统相比,楼板滑动系统能有效降低 25% 的楼层加速度。在第 2 阶段,即使层间漂移角达到 0.045 弧度,中等韧性的内置箱形柱基座仍然表现良好,没有出现局部屈曲。震后测试针对的是在所有振动台测试后从建筑试样中拆除的全钢首层 BRB。在核心板的两端观察到了核心板的高模屈曲,导致试验结束时强度略有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information SSI-induced seismic earth pressures on an integral abutment bridge model: Experimental measurements versus numerical simulations and code provisions Estimation of inelastic displacement ratio spectrum for existing RC structures via displacement response spectrum Linear equivalence for motion amplification devices in earthquake engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1