Uterine Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumors: p16 as a Surrogate for CDKN2A Deletion and Predictor of Aggressive Behavior.

Kyle M. Devins, Zehra Ordulu, Rachelle P Mendoza, S. Croce, Rishikesh Haridas, P. Wanjari, Andre Pinto, Esther Oliva, J. Bennett
{"title":"Uterine Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumors: p16 as a Surrogate for CDKN2A Deletion and Predictor of Aggressive Behavior.","authors":"Kyle M. Devins, Zehra Ordulu, Rachelle P Mendoza, S. Croce, Rishikesh Haridas, P. Wanjari, Andre Pinto, Esther Oliva, J. Bennett","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential. Aside from the recently described risk stratification score, which has not been validated by other studies, and rare reports of aberrant p16 expression in malignant tumors, there are no criteria to reliably predict behavior. Herein, we evaluated the clinicopathologic features and p16 expression patterns in 30 IMTs, with genomic profiling performed in a subset (13 malignant, 3 benign). Fifteen patients had malignant IMTs, defined by extrauterine disease at diagnosis (n=5) or recurrence (n=10; median: 24 mo). Patients ranged from 8 to 65 (median: 51) years and tumors from 6 to 22 (median: 12.5) cm. In primary tumors (n=13), infiltrative borders were noted in 10, moderate/severe cytologic atypia in 9, tumor cell necrosis in 7, and lymphovascular invasion in 6, while mitoses ranged from 0 to 21 (median: 7) per 10 high-power fields. In contrast, 15 patients with benign IMTs ranged from 28 to 65 (median: 44) years, with follow-up of 18 to 114 (median: 41) months. Tumors ranged from 1.9 to 8.5 (median: 5.5) cm, 2 demonstrated infiltrative borders, and 1 had moderate cytologic atypia. No other high-risk histologic features were observed. Application of the previously described clinicopathologic risk stratification score in all primary IMTs with complete data (n=18) classified 8 as high-risk (all malignant), 8 as intermediate-risk (3 malignant, 5 benign), and 2 as low-risk (benign). p16 was aberrant in all malignant IMTs, with <1% expression noted in 10, overexpression (>90%) in 4, and subclonal loss in 1; all benign tumors had patchy staining (20% to 80%; median 50%). Molecular analysis detected CDKN2A deletions in 8 of 9 tumors with <1% p16 expression, while the other harbored a TERT promoter mutation. TERT promoter mutations were also identified in 2 of 3 IMTs with p16 overexpression. Neither of these alterations was detected in the 3 sequenced benign IMTs. Thus, we recommend performing p16 on all uterine IMTs, which, combined with the risk stratification score, is a promising and cost-effective tool for predicting CDKN2A status and outcome in these patients. It may be particularly useful for tumors with incomplete information for risk stratification (ie, morcellated tumors) and for further stratifying intermediate-risk IMTs when sequencing is unavailable.","PeriodicalId":501610,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential. Aside from the recently described risk stratification score, which has not been validated by other studies, and rare reports of aberrant p16 expression in malignant tumors, there are no criteria to reliably predict behavior. Herein, we evaluated the clinicopathologic features and p16 expression patterns in 30 IMTs, with genomic profiling performed in a subset (13 malignant, 3 benign). Fifteen patients had malignant IMTs, defined by extrauterine disease at diagnosis (n=5) or recurrence (n=10; median: 24 mo). Patients ranged from 8 to 65 (median: 51) years and tumors from 6 to 22 (median: 12.5) cm. In primary tumors (n=13), infiltrative borders were noted in 10, moderate/severe cytologic atypia in 9, tumor cell necrosis in 7, and lymphovascular invasion in 6, while mitoses ranged from 0 to 21 (median: 7) per 10 high-power fields. In contrast, 15 patients with benign IMTs ranged from 28 to 65 (median: 44) years, with follow-up of 18 to 114 (median: 41) months. Tumors ranged from 1.9 to 8.5 (median: 5.5) cm, 2 demonstrated infiltrative borders, and 1 had moderate cytologic atypia. No other high-risk histologic features were observed. Application of the previously described clinicopathologic risk stratification score in all primary IMTs with complete data (n=18) classified 8 as high-risk (all malignant), 8 as intermediate-risk (3 malignant, 5 benign), and 2 as low-risk (benign). p16 was aberrant in all malignant IMTs, with <1% expression noted in 10, overexpression (>90%) in 4, and subclonal loss in 1; all benign tumors had patchy staining (20% to 80%; median 50%). Molecular analysis detected CDKN2A deletions in 8 of 9 tumors with <1% p16 expression, while the other harbored a TERT promoter mutation. TERT promoter mutations were also identified in 2 of 3 IMTs with p16 overexpression. Neither of these alterations was detected in the 3 sequenced benign IMTs. Thus, we recommend performing p16 on all uterine IMTs, which, combined with the risk stratification score, is a promising and cost-effective tool for predicting CDKN2A status and outcome in these patients. It may be particularly useful for tumors with incomplete information for risk stratification (ie, morcellated tumors) and for further stratifying intermediate-risk IMTs when sequencing is unavailable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤:p16 作为 CDKN2A 缺失的替代物和侵袭行为的预测因子
子宫炎性肌成纤维细胞瘤(IMTs)是一种罕见的间叶肿瘤,恶性可能性不确定。除了最近描述的风险分层评分(尚未得到其他研究的验证)和恶性肿瘤中 p16 异常表达的罕见报道外,目前还没有可靠的行为预测标准。在此,我们评估了 30 例 IMT 的临床病理特征和 p16 表达模式,并对其中一部分(13 例恶性,3 例良性)进行了基因组图谱分析。15例患者为恶性IMT,其定义为诊断时患有宫外疾病(5例)或复发(10例;中位:24个月)。患者年龄从 8 岁到 65 岁(中位数:51 岁)不等,肿瘤直径从 6 厘米到 22 厘米(中位数:12.5 厘米)不等。在原发性肿瘤(13 例)中,10 例出现浸润性边界,9 例出现中度/重度细胞学不典型性,7 例出现肿瘤细胞坏死,6 例出现淋巴管侵犯,而每 10 个高倍视野中的有丝分裂为 0 至 21 个(中位数:7 个)。相比之下,15 名良性 IMT 患者的年龄从 28 岁到 65 岁(中位数:44 岁)不等,随访时间从 18 个月到 114 个月(中位数:41 个月)不等。肿瘤大小从 1.9 厘米到 8.5 厘米(中位数:5.5 厘米)不等,其中 2 例肿瘤有浸润性边界,1 例肿瘤有中度细胞学不典型性。未发现其他高危组织学特征。在数据完整的所有原发性IMT(n=18)中,应用之前描述的临床病理学风险分层评分,8例为高风险(全部为恶性),8例为中度风险(3例为恶性,5例为良性),2例为低风险(良性)。所有恶性IMT的p16均有异常,其中4例为90%,1例为亚克隆丢失;所有良性肿瘤均有斑点状染色(20%至80%;中位数为50%)。分子分析发现,在 9 个 p16 表达率小于 1% 的肿瘤中,有 8 个存在 CDKN2A 缺失,另一个存在 TERT 启动子突变。在 3 个 p16 表达过高的 IMT 中,有 2 个也发现了 TERT 启动子突变。而在 3 个测序的良性 IMT 中均未检测到上述改变。因此,我们建议对所有子宫内膜间质进行 p16 检测,结合风险分层评分,这是预测 CDKN2A 状态和这些患者预后的一种有前途且经济有效的工具。对于风险分层信息不完整的肿瘤(即碎裂性肿瘤)以及无法进行测序的中危 IMT 进一步分层来说,它可能尤其有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Odontogenic Myxomas Harbor Recurrent Copy Number Alterations and a Distinct Methylation Signature. Characteristics and Clinical Value of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 Rearrangement Detected by Next-generation Sequencing in DLBCL. Intra-ampullary Papillary Tubular Neoplasm (IAPN): Clinicopathologic Analysis of 72 Cases Highlights the Distinctive Characteristics of a Poorly Recognized Entity. PON3::LCN1 and HTN3::MSANTD3 Gene Fusions With NR4A3/NR4A2 Expression in Salivary Acinic Cell Carcinoma. Yolk Sac Differentiation in Endometrial Carcinoma: Incidence and Clinicopathologic Features of Somatically Derived Yolk Sac Tumors Versus Carcinomas With Nonspecific Immunoexpression of Yolk Sac Markers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1