Stride Velocity 95th Centile Detects Decline in Ambulatory Function Over Shorter Intervals than the 6-Minute Walk Test or North Star Ambulatory Assessment in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neuromuscular diseases Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.3233/jnd-230188
Michael Rabbia, M. Ormazabal, H. Staunton, Klaas Veenstra, Damien Eggenspieler, M. Annoussamy, L. Servais, Paul Strijbos
{"title":"Stride Velocity 95th Centile Detects Decline in Ambulatory Function Over Shorter Intervals than the 6-Minute Walk Test or North Star Ambulatory Assessment in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.","authors":"Michael Rabbia, M. Ormazabal, H. Staunton, Klaas Veenstra, Damien Eggenspieler, M. Annoussamy, L. Servais, Paul Strijbos","doi":"10.3233/jnd-230188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nStride Velocity 95th Centile (SV95C) is the first wearable device-derived clinical outcome assessment (COA) to receive European Medicines Agency (EMA) qualification as a primary endpoint in patients aged ≥4 years.\n\n\nObjective\nTo compare SV95C-in its first-ever clinical trial application as a secondary endpoint-with established motor function COAs used in the trial (Four-Stair Climb [4SC] velocity, North Star Ambulatory Assessment [NSAA], and Six-Minute Walk Distance [6MWD]).\n\n\nMethods\nSV95C was a secondary endpoint in a subset (n = 47) of participants in the SPITFIRE/WN40227 trial of taldefgrobep alfa, which was discontinued due to lack of clinical benefit. Participants in the ≤48-week SV95C sub-study were 6-11 years old and received corticosteroids for ≥6 months pre-treatment. Pearson correlations were used to compare SV95C with the other COAs. Responsiveness and changes over time were respectively assessed via standardized response means (SRMs) based on absolute changes and mixed models for repeated measures.\n\n\nResults\nSV95C change at Week 24 was -0.07 m/s, with limited variability (standard deviation: 0.16, n = 27). The SRM for SV95C indicated moderate responsiveness to clinical change at the earliest timepoint (Week 12, n = 46), while those of the other COAs did not indicate moderate responsiveness until Week 36 (6MWD, n = 33) or Week 48 (4SC velocity, n = 20; NSAA total score, n = 20). Baseline correlations between SV95C and other COAs were strong (r = 0.611-0.695). Correlations between SV95C change from baseline to Week 48 and changes in other COAs were moderate to strong (r = 0.443-0.678).∥.\n\n\nConclusions\nOverall, SV95C demonstrated sensitivity to ambulatory decline over short intervals, low variability, and correlation with established COAs. Although the negative trial precluded demonstration of SV95C's sensitivity to drug effect, these findings support the continued use of SV95C in DMD clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":16536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jnd-230188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Stride Velocity 95th Centile (SV95C) is the first wearable device-derived clinical outcome assessment (COA) to receive European Medicines Agency (EMA) qualification as a primary endpoint in patients aged ≥4 years. Objective To compare SV95C-in its first-ever clinical trial application as a secondary endpoint-with established motor function COAs used in the trial (Four-Stair Climb [4SC] velocity, North Star Ambulatory Assessment [NSAA], and Six-Minute Walk Distance [6MWD]). Methods SV95C was a secondary endpoint in a subset (n = 47) of participants in the SPITFIRE/WN40227 trial of taldefgrobep alfa, which was discontinued due to lack of clinical benefit. Participants in the ≤48-week SV95C sub-study were 6-11 years old and received corticosteroids for ≥6 months pre-treatment. Pearson correlations were used to compare SV95C with the other COAs. Responsiveness and changes over time were respectively assessed via standardized response means (SRMs) based on absolute changes and mixed models for repeated measures. Results SV95C change at Week 24 was -0.07 m/s, with limited variability (standard deviation: 0.16, n = 27). The SRM for SV95C indicated moderate responsiveness to clinical change at the earliest timepoint (Week 12, n = 46), while those of the other COAs did not indicate moderate responsiveness until Week 36 (6MWD, n = 33) or Week 48 (4SC velocity, n = 20; NSAA total score, n = 20). Baseline correlations between SV95C and other COAs were strong (r = 0.611-0.695). Correlations between SV95C change from baseline to Week 48 and changes in other COAs were moderate to strong (r = 0.443-0.678).∥. Conclusions Overall, SV95C demonstrated sensitivity to ambulatory decline over short intervals, low variability, and correlation with established COAs. Although the negative trial precluded demonstration of SV95C's sensitivity to drug effect, these findings support the continued use of SV95C in DMD clinical trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与 6 分钟步行测试或 "北极星 "活动评估相比,步速第 95 百分位数能在更短时间内检测出杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症患者活动功能的下降。
背景骑行速度第95百分位数(SV95C)是首个获得欧洲药品管理局(EMA)认证的可穿戴设备衍生临床结果评估(COA),可作为年龄≥4岁患者的主要终点。方法SV95C是taldefgrobep alfa的SPITFIRE/WN40227试验参与者子集(n = 47)的次要终点,该试验因缺乏临床获益而终止。参加≤48周SV95C子研究的参与者年龄为6-11岁,治疗前接受皮质类固醇治疗≥6个月。皮尔逊相关性用于比较 SV95C 与其他 COA。结果第 24 周 SV95C 的变化为-0.07 m/s,变异性有限(标准差:0.16,n = 27)。SV95C 的 SRM 在最早的时间点(第 12 周,n = 46)显示出对临床变化的中度反应性,而其他 COA 的 SRM 直到第 36 周(6MWD,n = 33)或第 48 周(4SC 速度,n = 20;NSAA 总分,n = 20)才显示出中度反应性。SV95C 与其他 COA 之间的基线相关性很强(r = 0.611-0.695)。SV95C 从基线到第 48 周的变化与其他 COA 变化之间的相关性为中度到高度相关(r = 0.443-0.678)。虽然阴性试验不能证明 SV95C 对药物作用的敏感性,但这些发现支持在 DMD 临床试验中继续使用 SV95C。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neuromuscular diseases
Journal of neuromuscular diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases aims to facilitate progress in understanding the molecular genetics/correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, diagnosis and treatment of acquired and genetic neuromuscular diseases (including muscular dystrophy, myasthenia gravis, spinal muscular atrophy, neuropathies, myopathies, myotonias and myositis). The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, letters-to-the-editor, and will consider research that has negative findings. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational and clinical research that will improve our fundamental understanding and lead to effective treatments of neuromuscular diseases.
期刊最新文献
A Likely Pathogenic variant in the KBTBD13 Gene: A Case Series of Three Patients with Nemaline Myopathy Type 6. An International Retrospective Early Natural History Study of LAMA2-Related Dystrophies. Life Expectancy and Causes of Death in Patients with Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2. E-Health & Innovation to Overcome Barriers in Neuromuscular Diseases. Report from the 3rd eNMD Congress: Pisa, Italy, 29-30 October 2021. Predictors of Loss of Ambulation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1