Simulation of single-effect and triple-effect evaporator for fruit juice concentration using Aspen HYSYS

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Chemical Product and Process Modeling Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1515/cppm-2023-0093
Khalid W. Hameed, A. Khadom, Hameed B. Mahood
{"title":"Simulation of single-effect and triple-effect evaporator for fruit juice concentration using Aspen HYSYS","authors":"Khalid W. Hameed, A. Khadom, Hameed B. Mahood","doi":"10.1515/cppm-2023-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the most popular methods of fruit juice preservation is concentration since it offers a variety of advantages, like decreased volume, weight, packing, simpler transportation and handling, and a longer shelf life. The present paper studied the evaporation of fruit juice in single- and triple-effect evaporators using Aspen HYSYS software. The amount of juice was 3000 kg/h, and its concentration was raised from 10 to 50 °Brix. Four evaporator layouts were estimated and optimized: single-effect, modified single-effect, forward triple-effect, and triple-effect in parallel. It is a study of the effect of the temperature of saturated steam (120–300 °C) used to concentrate the juice and the pressure of the product (15–50 kPa) on the mass flow rate of steam required, economy, and overall heat transfer coefficient times area (UA) of the evaporator. The best operating conditions for each type of evaporation system were 15 kPa of the product’s pressure for all types of evaporators, 192, 240, 182, and 210 °C of the single-effect, modified single-effect, forward triple-effect, and parallel triple-effect, respectively. These operating conditions are equivalent to the steam required, economy, UA, and steam cost as follows: for each type, they were (3075, 338.4, 1224, and 1100 kg/h), (0.78, 7.1, 1.96, and 2.15), (40,182, 74,505, 539,987, 152,173 kJ/°C h), and (12.68 × 103, 12.76 × 103, 12.65 × 103, and 12.73 × 103 $/h), respectively.","PeriodicalId":9935,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2023-0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most popular methods of fruit juice preservation is concentration since it offers a variety of advantages, like decreased volume, weight, packing, simpler transportation and handling, and a longer shelf life. The present paper studied the evaporation of fruit juice in single- and triple-effect evaporators using Aspen HYSYS software. The amount of juice was 3000 kg/h, and its concentration was raised from 10 to 50 °Brix. Four evaporator layouts were estimated and optimized: single-effect, modified single-effect, forward triple-effect, and triple-effect in parallel. It is a study of the effect of the temperature of saturated steam (120–300 °C) used to concentrate the juice and the pressure of the product (15–50 kPa) on the mass flow rate of steam required, economy, and overall heat transfer coefficient times area (UA) of the evaporator. The best operating conditions for each type of evaporation system were 15 kPa of the product’s pressure for all types of evaporators, 192, 240, 182, and 210 °C of the single-effect, modified single-effect, forward triple-effect, and parallel triple-effect, respectively. These operating conditions are equivalent to the steam required, economy, UA, and steam cost as follows: for each type, they were (3075, 338.4, 1224, and 1100 kg/h), (0.78, 7.1, 1.96, and 2.15), (40,182, 74,505, 539,987, 152,173 kJ/°C h), and (12.68 × 103, 12.76 × 103, 12.65 × 103, and 12.73 × 103 $/h), respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Aspen HYSYS 模拟浓缩果汁的单效和三效蒸发器
浓缩果汁是最受欢迎的果汁保存方法之一,因为它具有多种优点,如体积小、重量轻、包装简便、运输和处理简单以及保质期长。本文使用 Aspen HYSYS 软件研究了果汁在单效和三效蒸发器中的蒸发过程。果汁量为 3000 公斤/小时,浓度从 10 °Brix 提高到 50 °Brix。对四种蒸发器布局进行了估算和优化:单效蒸发器、改进型单效蒸发器、正向三效蒸发器和并联三效蒸发器。研究了用于浓缩果汁的饱和蒸汽温度(120-300 °C)和产品压力(15-50 kPa)对所需蒸汽质量流量、经济性和蒸发器整体传热系数乘以面积(UA)的影响。各类蒸发系统的最佳运行条件是:所有类型蒸发器的产品压力均为 15 kPa;单效、改良单效、正向三效和并联三效的温度分别为 192、240、182 和 210 ℃。这些运行条件相当于所需蒸汽量、经济性、UA 和蒸汽成本如下:对于每种类型,它们分别为(3075、338.4、1224 和 1100 kg/h)、(0.78、7.1、1.96 和 2.15)、(40 182、74 505、539 987 和 152 173 kJ/°C h)和(12.68 × 103、12.76 × 103、12.65 × 103 和 12.73 × 103 $/h)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Chemical Product and Process Modeling ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Chemical Product and Process Modeling (CPPM) is a quarterly journal that publishes theoretical and applied research on product and process design modeling, simulation and optimization. Thanks to its international editorial board, the journal assembles the best papers from around the world on to cover the gap between product and process. The journal brings together chemical and process engineering researchers, practitioners, and software developers in a new forum for the international modeling and simulation community. Topics: equation oriented and modular simulation optimization technology for process and materials design, new modeling techniques shortcut modeling and design approaches performance of commercial and in-house simulation and optimization tools challenges faced in industrial product and process simulation and optimization computational fluid dynamics environmental process, food and pharmaceutical modeling topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between modeling and mathematics applied to chemical products and processes.
期刊最新文献
Layouts and tips for a typical final-year chemical engineering graduation project A parametric study on syngas production by adding CO2 and CH4 on steam gasification of biomass system using ASPEN Plus Temperature optimization model to inhibit zero-order kinetic reactions Numerical investigation of discharge pressure effect on steam ejector performance in renewable refrigeration cycle by considering wet steam model and dry gas model Energy efficiency in cooling systems: integrating machine learning and meta-heuristic algorithms for precise cooling load prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1