Perceptions of the Teaching Profession and Motivation to Teach among Slovenian University Students

Melita Puklek Levpušček, Katja Depolli Steiner
{"title":"Perceptions of the Teaching Profession and Motivation to Teach among Slovenian University Students","authors":"Melita Puklek Levpušček, Katja Depolli Steiner","doi":"10.26529/cepsj.1745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the perception of the teaching profession among students of social sciences and languages who were finishing their undergraduate studies and intended to continue their studies with a master’s degree. A subgroup of students planning to study for a master’s degree in teaching reported on their motivation to teach and their satisfaction with their career choice, while a subgroup of students who planned to pursue a master’s degree programme without a teaching degree responded to an open-ended question about why they did not want to become teachers. Participants answered the FIT-Choice Scale, which measures twelve motivational factors and six perceptions about the teaching profession. Students recognised teachers’ expertise; however, social status and salary were rated lower, indicating an imbalance between demands and rewards in the teaching profession. Altruistic and intrinsic motives were the main reasons for choosing the teaching profession. Students who will study teaching also rated their ability to become a teacher highly. Extrinsic factors (job transferability, teaching as a fallback career and time for family) were less important. Qualitative thematic analysis of the responses of students who will not study to become a teacher revealed that low intrinsic value (e.g., disinterest in teaching) and low personal utility value (e.g., better professional development elsewhere) were the most common themes. The high job demands due to demanding interactions with children and parents were also mentioned, while the teacher education programme was perceived as excessively extensive. The implications of the study highlight important considerations for policymakers and teacher education programmes.","PeriodicalId":38159,"journal":{"name":"Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal","volume":"154 6‐10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the perception of the teaching profession among students of social sciences and languages who were finishing their undergraduate studies and intended to continue their studies with a master’s degree. A subgroup of students planning to study for a master’s degree in teaching reported on their motivation to teach and their satisfaction with their career choice, while a subgroup of students who planned to pursue a master’s degree programme without a teaching degree responded to an open-ended question about why they did not want to become teachers. Participants answered the FIT-Choice Scale, which measures twelve motivational factors and six perceptions about the teaching profession. Students recognised teachers’ expertise; however, social status and salary were rated lower, indicating an imbalance between demands and rewards in the teaching profession. Altruistic and intrinsic motives were the main reasons for choosing the teaching profession. Students who will study teaching also rated their ability to become a teacher highly. Extrinsic factors (job transferability, teaching as a fallback career and time for family) were less important. Qualitative thematic analysis of the responses of students who will not study to become a teacher revealed that low intrinsic value (e.g., disinterest in teaching) and low personal utility value (e.g., better professional development elsewhere) were the most common themes. The high job demands due to demanding interactions with children and parents were also mentioned, while the teacher education programme was perceived as excessively extensive. The implications of the study highlight important considerations for policymakers and teacher education programmes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛文尼亚大学生对教师职业的看法和从教动机
本研究调查了即将完成本科学业并打算继续攻读硕士学位的社会科学和语言专业学生对教师职业的看法。一部分计划攻读教学硕士学位的学生汇报了他们从教的动机以及对自己职业选择的满意度,而另一部分计划攻读硕士学位但不攻读教学学位的学生则回答了一个开放式问题,即他们为什么不想成为教师。参与者回答了 "FIT-选择量表",该量表测量了十二个动机因素和六种对教师职业的看法。学生们认可教师的专业知识,但对社会地位和薪酬的评价较低,这表明教师职业的要求与回报之间存在不平衡。利他动机和内在动机是选择教师职业的主要原因。将学习师范专业的学生对自己成为教师的能力评价也很高。外在因素(工作的可转换性、将教师作为后备职业以及有时间照顾家庭)则不那么重要。对不打算学习教师职业的学生的回答进行的定性专题分析表明,低内在价值(如对教学不感兴趣)和低个人效用价值(如在其他地方获得更好的职业发展)是最常见的主题。还有人提到,与儿童和家长的互动对工作要求很高,而师范教育课程则被认为过于宽泛。本研究的意义强调了政策制定者和师范教育计划需要考虑的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Student-Centred Approaches in Higher Education from the Student Perspective Perceived Change in Job Demands and Resources and Teacher Well-Being during the Pandemic Digital-inclusive Transformation and Teacher Preparedness for Foreign Language Education – A Bilateral German-Norwegian Perspective Supporting Preservice Teachers’ Civic Competence as a Strategy for Internationalisation in the Digital Era Promoting Interaction to Enhance Student Perceived Learning and Satisfaction in a Large e-Flipped Accounting Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1