Comparison of Conventional Water Treatment and Ultrafiltration Pilot Tests in the Rozgrund Water Treatment Plant

D. Barloková, Ján Ilavský, Alena Matis, O. Kapusta
{"title":"Comparison of Conventional Water Treatment\nand Ultrafiltration Pilot Tests\nin the Rozgrund Water Treatment Plant","authors":"D. Barloková, Ján Ilavský, Alena Matis, O. Kapusta","doi":"10.15244/pjoes/177621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WTP Rozgrund, which was used to treat to the water from Rozgrund reservoir, must have been set out of operation due to the deteriorated quality of the water and its smell. The aAim of this work was to perform the pilot-plant tests, with the goal ofaiming to treating water from the reservoir to achieveand get the compliantying water quality of the water. Conventional water treatment concerning coagulation, flocculation, and filtration with two different filtration fillings – Filtralite Mono-MultiFine and filter sand with black-coal material Carboziar – was compared with conventional treatments with filter sand and Carboziar complemented with filtration through granulated active coal (Norit 830), the ultrafilration using fully automated equipment with membrane module UA-640 (Microdyn-Nadir), and ultrafiltration combined with active granulated carbon. Monitored wereas the pH, turbidity, color, alkalinity, COD Mn , TOC, aluminum, number and size of particles, and hydrobiology in the samples of raw and treated water. Obtained results provided that the two most suitable treatment technologies were the filtration with double layer filling consisting of sand and antracite combined with filtration via GAU (removal efficiency of COD Mn and turbidity was 90.5% and 85%, respectively) and the ultrafiltration combined with GAU (82.6% for COD Mn and 89% for turbidity removal). Biological activation after the treatment was not found.","PeriodicalId":510399,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","volume":"69 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/177621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

WTP Rozgrund, which was used to treat to the water from Rozgrund reservoir, must have been set out of operation due to the deteriorated quality of the water and its smell. The aAim of this work was to perform the pilot-plant tests, with the goal ofaiming to treating water from the reservoir to achieveand get the compliantying water quality of the water. Conventional water treatment concerning coagulation, flocculation, and filtration with two different filtration fillings – Filtralite Mono-MultiFine and filter sand with black-coal material Carboziar – was compared with conventional treatments with filter sand and Carboziar complemented with filtration through granulated active coal (Norit 830), the ultrafilration using fully automated equipment with membrane module UA-640 (Microdyn-Nadir), and ultrafiltration combined with active granulated carbon. Monitored wereas the pH, turbidity, color, alkalinity, COD Mn , TOC, aluminum, number and size of particles, and hydrobiology in the samples of raw and treated water. Obtained results provided that the two most suitable treatment technologies were the filtration with double layer filling consisting of sand and antracite combined with filtration via GAU (removal efficiency of COD Mn and turbidity was 90.5% and 85%, respectively) and the ultrafiltration combined with GAU (82.6% for COD Mn and 89% for turbidity removal). Biological activation after the treatment was not found.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗兹格伦德水处理厂常规水处理与超滤试点试验的比较
罗兹格伦德污水处理厂用于处理罗兹格伦德水库的水,但由于水质恶化且有异味,必须停止运行。这项工作的目的是进行中试厂试验,以处理水库的水,达到并获得符合要求的水质。使用两种不同的过滤填料(Filtralite Mono-MultiFine 和含有黑炭材料 Carboziar 的滤砂)进行混凝、絮凝和过滤的传统水处理方法,与使用滤砂和 Carboziar 并辅以颗粒活性炭(Norit 830)过滤的传统处理方法、使用带有膜组件 UA-640 的全自动设备(Microdyn-Nadir)进行的超滤以及结合活性颗粒碳的超滤进行的处理方法进行了比较。监测项目包括原水和处理水样本中的 pH 值、浊度、色度、碱度、化学需氧量锰、总有机碳、铝、颗粒数量和大小以及水生物。结果表明,两种最合适的处理技术分别是由沙子和无烟煤组成的双层过滤与 GAU 过滤(化学需氧量锰和浊度的去除率分别为 90.5%和 85%),以及超滤与 GAU 的结合(化学需氧量锰的去除率为 82.6%,浊度的去除率为 89%)。处理后未发现生物活化现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Straw Biochar Production and Carbon Emission Reduction Potential in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Region Impact of Biogas Slurry on Physiological and Antioxidant Mechanisms of Wheat Under Drought Stress Adsorption of Reactive Blue 13 from Dyeing Wastewater onto Mesoporous Carbon Xerogels Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Triple and Single-Capsule Sesame (Sesamum Indicum L.) Varieties and Their Antioxidant Enzyme Activities Has Green Credit Promoted High-Quality Economic Development? Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1