The impact of preoperative anxiety on pain and analgesia consumption in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia.

Hasan Berkan Sayal, H. Inal, Z. Ozturk Inal
{"title":"The impact of preoperative anxiety on pain and analgesia consumption in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia.","authors":"Hasan Berkan Sayal, H. Inal, Z. Ozturk Inal","doi":"10.5603/gpl.94702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo assess the impact of preoperative anxiety on pain and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (VH) with general and spinal anesthesia.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nA total of 200 participants, including 100 undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with general anesthesia (group 1) and 100 with spinal anesthesia (group 2), were enrolled. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for the postoperative pain intensity.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe 1st hour, 6th hour, 12th hour, and 18th hour VAS scores were higher in vaginal hysterectomy with general anesthesia than in vaginal hysterectomy with spinal anesthesia.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlthough participants undergoing VH with spinal anesthesia (preoperative state anxiety inventory score > 45) had lower pain intensity scores in the first 18 hours compared to those undergoing VH with general anesthesia, their postoperative analgesic requirements were similar.","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.94702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of preoperative anxiety on pain and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (VH) with general and spinal anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 200 participants, including 100 undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with general anesthesia (group 1) and 100 with spinal anesthesia (group 2), were enrolled. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for the postoperative pain intensity. RESULTS The 1st hour, 6th hour, 12th hour, and 18th hour VAS scores were higher in vaginal hysterectomy with general anesthesia than in vaginal hysterectomy with spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS Although participants undergoing VH with spinal anesthesia (preoperative state anxiety inventory score > 45) had lower pain intensity scores in the first 18 hours compared to those undergoing VH with general anesthesia, their postoperative analgesic requirements were similar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉进行阴道子宫切除术的妇女术前焦虑对疼痛和镇痛消耗量的影响。
目的评估在全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉下进行阴道子宫切除术(VH)的患者术前焦虑对疼痛和镇痛药消耗量的影响。方法共招募了 200 名参与者,其中 100 名在全身麻醉下进行阴道子宫切除术(第 1 组),100 名在脊髓麻醉下进行阴道子宫切除术(第 2 组)。结果全身麻醉下阴道子宫切除术的第 1 小时、第 6 小时、第 12 小时和第 18 小时的 VAS 评分均高于脊髓麻醉下的阴道子宫切除术。结论虽然与接受全身麻醉的患者相比,接受脊髓麻醉阴道子宫切除术的患者(术前状态焦虑量表评分大于 45 分)在前 18 小时的疼痛强度评分较低,但他们的术后镇痛需求相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of a patient at reproductive age with BRCA2 and CHEK2 mutations and multiple uterine fibroids. Breastfeeding myths - the prevalence among the population of Polish women. Clinical application of Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator in labor pre-induction: departmental protocol and literature review. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone and double-balloon catheters in cervical ripening: a propensity score matching retrospective study. Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) - prenatal diagnosis and management. The Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians Guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1