The Sociology of Police Behavior

IF 8.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Annual Review of Sociology Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-031902
Rashawn Ray, Connor Powelson, Genesis Fuentes, Long Doan
{"title":"The Sociology of Police Behavior","authors":"Rashawn Ray, Connor Powelson, Genesis Fuentes, Long Doan","doi":"10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-031902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Black Americans are 3.5 times and Black teenagers are 21 times more likely to be killed by police than their White counterparts. Generally, protective factors such as social class do little to reduce this disparity, as high-income Black Americans are just as likely to be killed by police as low-income Black Americans. Given these outcomes, it is unsurprising that the bulk of sociological research on policing examines disparities in policing outcomes between Black and Brown communities and individuals and their White counterparts. We begin by outlining this important research. In addition to focusing on the consequences of (over)policing, sociologists can make unique contributions to our understanding of the empirical limitations of contemporary policing data and the macro-, meso-, and micro-level mechanisms that contribute to policing inequalities. While we draw upon some research in other disciplines, sociologists can and should do more in these areas. Accordingly, the end of this review focuses on future directions and theoretical possibilities by centering emerging research that pivots sociology to a more direct focus on overcoming the methodological limits of police research and contributing to meaningful behavioral, organizational, and policy changes.","PeriodicalId":51353,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-031902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black Americans are 3.5 times and Black teenagers are 21 times more likely to be killed by police than their White counterparts. Generally, protective factors such as social class do little to reduce this disparity, as high-income Black Americans are just as likely to be killed by police as low-income Black Americans. Given these outcomes, it is unsurprising that the bulk of sociological research on policing examines disparities in policing outcomes between Black and Brown communities and individuals and their White counterparts. We begin by outlining this important research. In addition to focusing on the consequences of (over)policing, sociologists can make unique contributions to our understanding of the empirical limitations of contemporary policing data and the macro-, meso-, and micro-level mechanisms that contribute to policing inequalities. While we draw upon some research in other disciplines, sociologists can and should do more in these areas. Accordingly, the end of this review focuses on future directions and theoretical possibilities by centering emerging research that pivots sociology to a more direct focus on overcoming the methodological limits of police research and contributing to meaningful behavioral, organizational, and policy changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察行为社会学
美国黑人被警察杀害的可能性是白人的 3.5 倍,黑人青少年被警察杀害的可能性是白人的 21 倍。一般来说,社会阶层等保护性因素对缩小这种差距作用不大,因为高收入的美国黑人与低收入的美国黑人一样容易被警察杀害。鉴于这些结果,有关治安的大部分社会学研究都在探讨黑人和棕色人种社区及个人与白人社区及个人之间在治安方面的差距,这一点也就不足为奇了。我们首先概述这一重要研究。除了关注(过度)警务的后果,社会学家还能为我们理解当代警务数据的经验局限性以及造成警务不平等的宏观、中观和微观机制做出独特贡献。虽然我们借鉴了其他学科的一些研究成果,但社会学家可以而且应该在这些领域做出更多贡献。因此,本综述的结尾将重点放在未来的发展方向和理论可能性上,以新出现的研究为中心,使社会学更直接地关注克服警务研究的方法论局限,并促进有意义的行为、组织和政策变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Sociology, established in 1975, provides comprehensive coverage of significant developments in the field of sociology. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including major theoretical and methodological advancements, as well as current research across major subfields within sociology. Topics Covered: Social Processes Institutions and Culture Organizations Political and Economic Sociology Stratification Demography Urban Sociology Social Policy Historical Sociology Major Developments in Sociology in Other Regions of the World Content: Review chapters within the journal typically delve into these topics, offering in-depth analyses and insights into various aspects of sociology. These chapters serve to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of the field's current state and recent advancements.
期刊最新文献
Sociology of Twitter/X: Trends, Challenges, and Future Research Directions Interracial Unions and Racial Assortative Mating in an Age of Growing Diversity, Shifting Intimate Relationships, and Emerging Technologies The Latino Middle Class Thinking Like a Feminist: What Feminist Theory Has to Offer Sociology Early-Life Exposures and Social Stratification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1