[Impact Analysis of a new, Cross-sector Service Provision of Gastroenterologic Endoscopic Services in Accordance with 115f SGB V (Hybrid-DRG): Allocation Matrix and Cost Analysis].

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1055/a-2292-9766
Markus Rathmayer, Sebastian Belle, Wolfgang Heinlein, Markus Dollhopf, Martin Braun, Jörg G Albert
{"title":"[Impact Analysis of a new, Cross-sector Service Provision of Gastroenterologic Endoscopic Services in Accordance with 115f SGB V (Hybrid-DRG): Allocation Matrix and Cost Analysis].","authors":"Markus Rathmayer, Sebastian Belle, Wolfgang Heinlein, Markus Dollhopf, Martin Braun, Jörg G Albert","doi":"10.1055/a-2292-9766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nWith the introduction of §115f SGB V, the prerequisites for \"sector-equal remuneration\" ('Hybrid DRG') have been created. In an impact analysis, we assigned inpatient gastroenterological endoscopic (GAEN) cases in a matrix of future hybrid DRG versus outpatient surgery (AOP) or inpatient treatment.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn selected DRGs (G47B, G67A, G67B, G67C, G71Z, H41D, H41E) an allocation matrix of GAEN cases was created on medical grounds. For this purpose, service groups from the DGVS service catalog ('Leistungskatalog') were assigned to the groups: 'Hybrid-DRG', 'AOP' and 'Inpatient' by a group of experts based on the DGVS position paper. Cost data from the DGVS-DRG project for the 2022 data year from 36 InEK calculation hospitals with a total of 232,476 GAEN cases were evaluated.\n\n\nRESULTS\n26 service groups from the DGVS service catalog were assigned to a \"Hybrid-DRG\", 24 to the \"inpatient\" group, and 12 to the \"AOP\" group. 7 performance groups were splitted \"depending on the OPS code\" and classified at this level. Cases with additional fees were excluded from a hybrid DRG because these cannot be agreed there.The cost analysis shows that services that are already in the AOP have a similar cost level to services that have been classified as 'Hybrid-DRG'. With the cost calculation, a cost level could be presented for the hybrid DRGs formed.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBased on clearly defined structural, procedural and personnel requirements, services from suitable DRGs can be transferred to a hybrid DRG. Assigning services without the involvement of clinical experts seems extremely difficult. Case assignment based on arbitrary contextual factors increases complexity without demonstrably increasing the quality of the assignment and needs to be further developed. A cost analysis can be derived from the known inpatient costs and must serve as the basis for the 2025 Hybrid DRG catalog.","PeriodicalId":23853,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2292-9766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND With the introduction of §115f SGB V, the prerequisites for "sector-equal remuneration" ('Hybrid DRG') have been created. In an impact analysis, we assigned inpatient gastroenterological endoscopic (GAEN) cases in a matrix of future hybrid DRG versus outpatient surgery (AOP) or inpatient treatment. METHODS In selected DRGs (G47B, G67A, G67B, G67C, G71Z, H41D, H41E) an allocation matrix of GAEN cases was created on medical grounds. For this purpose, service groups from the DGVS service catalog ('Leistungskatalog') were assigned to the groups: 'Hybrid-DRG', 'AOP' and 'Inpatient' by a group of experts based on the DGVS position paper. Cost data from the DGVS-DRG project for the 2022 data year from 36 InEK calculation hospitals with a total of 232,476 GAEN cases were evaluated. RESULTS 26 service groups from the DGVS service catalog were assigned to a "Hybrid-DRG", 24 to the "inpatient" group, and 12 to the "AOP" group. 7 performance groups were splitted "depending on the OPS code" and classified at this level. Cases with additional fees were excluded from a hybrid DRG because these cannot be agreed there.The cost analysis shows that services that are already in the AOP have a similar cost level to services that have been classified as 'Hybrid-DRG'. With the cost calculation, a cost level could be presented for the hybrid DRGs formed. CONCLUSION Based on clearly defined structural, procedural and personnel requirements, services from suitable DRGs can be transferred to a hybrid DRG. Assigning services without the involvement of clinical experts seems extremely difficult. Case assignment based on arbitrary contextual factors increases complexity without demonstrably increasing the quality of the assignment and needs to be further developed. A cost analysis can be derived from the known inpatient costs and must serve as the basis for the 2025 Hybrid DRG catalog.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[根据 115f SGB V(Hybrid-DRG)提供新的跨部门消化内镜服务的影响分析:分配矩阵和成本分析]。
背景随着§115f SGB V的引入,"部门平等薪酬"('混合DRG')的先决条件已经建立。在一项影响分析中,我们将住院胃肠内窥镜检查(GAEN)病例与门诊手术(AOP)或住院治疗相比较,分配到未来混合 DRG 的矩阵中。方法在选定的 DRG(G47B、G67A、G67B、G67C、G71Z、H41D、H41E)中,根据医疗理由创建了 GAEN 病例分配矩阵。为此,专家组根据 DGVS 立场文件,将 DGVS 服务目录("Leistungskatalog")中的服务组分配到 "Hybrid-DRG"、"AOP "和 "Inpatient "组中。结果 DGVS 服务目录中的 26 个服务组被归入 "混合-DRG "组,24 个被归入 "住院病人 "组,12 个被归入 "AOP "组。7 个绩效组别 "根据 OPS 代码 "进行了拆分,并在此级别上进行了分类。成本分析表明,已列入 AOP 的服务与被划分为 "混合 DRG "的服务具有相似的成本水平。通过成本计算,可以得出混合 DRGs 的成本水平。在没有临床专家参与的情况下分配服务似乎极其困难。基于任意背景因素的病例分配增加了复杂性,但并未明显提高分配质量,因此需要进一步开发。成本分析可以从已知的住院费用中得出,必须作为 2025 年混合 DRG 目录的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
562
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie ist seit über 50 Jahren die führende deutsche Fachzeitschrift auf dem Gebiet der Gastroenterologie. Sie richtet sich an Gastroenterologen und alle anderen gastroenterologisch interessierten Ärzte. Als offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten sowie der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie informiert sie zuverlässig und aktuell über die wichtigen Neuerungen und Entwicklungen in der Gastroenterologie.
期刊最新文献
Konservative versus chirurgische Therapie beim idiopathischen und sekundären Megakolon oder Megarektum im Erwachsenenalter - eine retrospektive multizentrische Kontrollstudie. Hemosuccus pancreaticus - Multidisciplinary therapy for a splenic artery aneurysm, ruptured into the pancreatic duct. Sub-optimal therapy of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in the real-life stetting of the German PBC cohort. Remission of refractory esophageal lichen planus induced by tofacitinib. [Management of gastroparesis care in Germany - a survey by the working group of guiding gastroenterologic clinicians (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Gastroenterologischer Krankenhausärzte, ALGK)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1