{"title":"Holistic Review in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study.","authors":"Oanh H. Truong, Jenny Y. Wang, Peter F. Cronholm","doi":"10.22454/fammed.2024.515525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\nInterest in using holistic review for residency recruitment as a strategy to improve the diversity of the physician workforce has increased. However, no data are published on the prevalence of holistic review in the selection process for family medicine residency programs. We designed this study to assess programs' knowledge, skills, and attitudes; prevalence; barriers to implementation; and program characteristics associated with the use of holistic review.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData for this study were elicited as part of a 2023 survey conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance. The nationwide, web-based survey was sent to 739 family medicine residency program directors.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 309 program directors completed the holistic review portion of the survey. Programs that understood and agreed with holistic review used it more in their selection process. Holistic review was more common in programs with higher rates of residents, faculty, and patients that are underrepresented in medicine. Barriers to holistic review utilization were increased number of applicants, increased resources associated with holistic review, and lack of consensus on the holistic review approach.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe holistic review process is an area of growing interest to diversify the physician workforce, especially among residencies caring for underresourced communities. Further discussions on the specific scoring rubrics of family medicine residency programs that use holistic review are needed and could help programs that are facing barriers. Widespread use of holistic review to diversify the physician workforce has the potential to improve patient care access and health.","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2024.515525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Interest in using holistic review for residency recruitment as a strategy to improve the diversity of the physician workforce has increased. However, no data are published on the prevalence of holistic review in the selection process for family medicine residency programs. We designed this study to assess programs' knowledge, skills, and attitudes; prevalence; barriers to implementation; and program characteristics associated with the use of holistic review.
METHODS
Data for this study were elicited as part of a 2023 survey conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance. The nationwide, web-based survey was sent to 739 family medicine residency program directors.
RESULTS
A total of 309 program directors completed the holistic review portion of the survey. Programs that understood and agreed with holistic review used it more in their selection process. Holistic review was more common in programs with higher rates of residents, faculty, and patients that are underrepresented in medicine. Barriers to holistic review utilization were increased number of applicants, increased resources associated with holistic review, and lack of consensus on the holistic review approach.
CONCLUSIONS
The holistic review process is an area of growing interest to diversify the physician workforce, especially among residencies caring for underresourced communities. Further discussions on the specific scoring rubrics of family medicine residency programs that use holistic review are needed and could help programs that are facing barriers. Widespread use of holistic review to diversify the physician workforce has the potential to improve patient care access and health.
背景和目的 人们越来越关注在住院医师招聘中使用整体审查作为提高医生队伍多样性的策略。然而,目前还没有关于全科医学住院医师项目遴选过程中采用整体审查的数据。我们设计了这项研究,以评估项目的知识、技能和态度;流行程度;实施障碍;以及与使用整体审查相关的项目特征。方法本研究的数据是由全科医学教育研究联盟理事会(Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance)进行的2023年调查的一部分。结果共有 309 名项目主任完成了调查中的整体审查部分。了解并同意整体审查的项目在选拔过程中更多地使用了整体审查。在住院医师、教职员工和患者比例较高且在医学界代表性不足的项目中,整体审查更为常见。采用整体评审的障碍是申请人数增加、与整体评审相关的资源增加以及对整体评审方法缺乏共识。需要进一步讨论使用整体评审的全科住院医师培训项目的具体评分标准,这将有助于那些面临障碍的培训项目。广泛使用整体评审来实现医生队伍的多样化,有可能改善患者的医疗服务和健康状况。
期刊介绍:
Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.