Effect of Preemptive Systemic Patient-controlled Analgesia in Evisceration

Ji Ho Jun, Ga Hyun Lee
{"title":"Effect of Preemptive Systemic Patient-controlled Analgesia in Evisceration","authors":"Ji Ho Jun, Ga Hyun Lee","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2024.65.4.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the effect of preemptive systemic analgesia using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative pain after evisceration.Methods: Of the patients who underwent evisceration under general anesthesia in our hospital, 55 who were able to evaluate pain using a numeral rating scale (NRS) were included. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 used PCA after surgery, and group 2 used PCA preemptively before surgery. We compared the two groups in terms of the NRS pain scores on the day of surgery and 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery, and according to whether additional analgesics were used.Results: The 55 patients included 17 in group 1 and 38 in group 2. The NRS at 3, 5, and 7 hours on the day of surgery tended to be lower in group 2, but not significantly (p > 0.05). The NRS on days 1 and 2 after surgery was significantly lower in group 2 (p = 0.014 and p = 0.027, respectively), and the NRS on day 3 after surgery was also lower, although not significantly (p = 0.059). Significantly fewer cases required additional analgesics in group 2 compared to group 1 on the day of surgery and 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.008, respectively).Conclusions: Using preemptive systemic PCA in evisceration significantly reduced the postoperative pain, and PCA itself was an effective administration method due to the high rate of pain control without the need for additional analgesics.","PeriodicalId":504314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2024.65.4.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of preemptive systemic analgesia using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative pain after evisceration.Methods: Of the patients who underwent evisceration under general anesthesia in our hospital, 55 who were able to evaluate pain using a numeral rating scale (NRS) were included. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 used PCA after surgery, and group 2 used PCA preemptively before surgery. We compared the two groups in terms of the NRS pain scores on the day of surgery and 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery, and according to whether additional analgesics were used.Results: The 55 patients included 17 in group 1 and 38 in group 2. The NRS at 3, 5, and 7 hours on the day of surgery tended to be lower in group 2, but not significantly (p > 0.05). The NRS on days 1 and 2 after surgery was significantly lower in group 2 (p = 0.014 and p = 0.027, respectively), and the NRS on day 3 after surgery was also lower, although not significantly (p = 0.059). Significantly fewer cases required additional analgesics in group 2 compared to group 1 on the day of surgery and 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.008, respectively).Conclusions: Using preemptive systemic PCA in evisceration significantly reduced the postoperative pain, and PCA itself was an effective administration method due to the high rate of pain control without the need for additional analgesics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开膛手术中先期全身患者自控镇痛的效果
目的:探讨使用患者自控镇痛(PCA)进行先期全身镇痛对开腹手术后疼痛的影响:方法:在我院接受全身麻醉下开腹手术的患者中,有 55 人能够使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛。患者被分为两组:第一组在手术后使用 PCA,第二组在手术前预先使用 PCA。我们比较了两组患者在手术当天和术后 1、2、3 天的 NRS 疼痛评分,以及是否使用了额外的镇痛剂:55名患者中,第一组17人,第二组38人。 手术当天3、5和7小时的NRS评分第二组往往较低,但不明显(P>0.05)。术后第 1 天和第 2 天的 NRS 值在第 2 组明显较低(分别为 p = 0.014 和 p = 0.027),术后第 3 天的 NRS 值也较低,但不明显(p = 0.059)。与第一组相比,第二组在手术当天和术后1、2、3天需要额外镇痛剂的病例显著减少(分别为p = 0.001、p < 0.001、p < 0.001和p = 0.008):在开腹手术中使用先期全身 PCA 能显著减轻术后疼痛,而且 PCA 本身也是一种有效的给药方法,因为疼痛控制率高,无需额外使用镇痛药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Initial Factors Associated with Resistance to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Three Familial Cases of Stickler Syndrome: A Case Report One-year Clinical Outcome of Topical Bromfenac in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy A Case of Atypical Cytomegalovirus Corneal Endotheliitis after Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injection Correction of Internal Astigmatism Using Toric Scleral Contact Lens after Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1