Either win-win deal or exploitation? Narratives surrounding volunteering in the social scientific literature

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Voluntary Sector Review Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1332/20408056y2024d000000019
Marion Valérie Repetti, Kelly Harrison, Pauline Mesnard, Farinaz Fassa
{"title":"Either win-win deal or exploitation? Narratives surrounding volunteering in the social scientific literature","authors":"Marion Valérie Repetti, Kelly Harrison, Pauline Mesnard, Farinaz Fassa","doi":"10.1332/20408056y2024d000000019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volunteering is an essential resource for European countries and can be an opportunity for social participation. Yet it can also lead to exploitation. Social scientific narratives on this object are important because of the role that scholars can play in the development and implementation of public policies. Drawing on the observation that older people provide a significant portion of volunteer work, this article examines to what extent and how the social scientific literature about older volunteers questions the risk of exploitation that is inherent to any form of voluntary engagement. We find that these discourses predominantly describe volunteering as a means to improve older people’s lives and as a needed contribution. Risks of exploitation are rarely addressed. To help avoid ageism in social sciences and in volunteering policies and programmes, we suggest that scholars should give more awareness to the volunteering-exploitation nexus in their studies of older volunteers.","PeriodicalId":45084,"journal":{"name":"Voluntary Sector Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voluntary Sector Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/20408056y2024d000000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volunteering is an essential resource for European countries and can be an opportunity for social participation. Yet it can also lead to exploitation. Social scientific narratives on this object are important because of the role that scholars can play in the development and implementation of public policies. Drawing on the observation that older people provide a significant portion of volunteer work, this article examines to what extent and how the social scientific literature about older volunteers questions the risk of exploitation that is inherent to any form of voluntary engagement. We find that these discourses predominantly describe volunteering as a means to improve older people’s lives and as a needed contribution. Risks of exploitation are rarely addressed. To help avoid ageism in social sciences and in volunteering policies and programmes, we suggest that scholars should give more awareness to the volunteering-exploitation nexus in their studies of older volunteers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是双赢交易还是剥削?社会科学文献中有关志愿服务的叙述
志愿服务是欧洲国家的重要资源,可以成为社会参与的机会。然而,它也可能导致剥削。有关这一对象的社会科学叙述非常重要,因为学者们可以在公共政策的制定和实施中发挥作用。本文从老年人提供了大量志愿工作这一观察出发,研究了有关老年志愿者的社会科学文献在多大程度上以及如何质疑任何形式的志愿参与所固有的剥削风险。我们发现,这些论述主要将志愿服务描述为改善老年人生活的一种手段和一种必要的贡 献。剥削的风险很少被提及。为了避免社会科学以及志愿服务政策和计划中的年龄歧视,我们建议学者们在对老年志愿者的研究中更多地关注志愿服务与剥削之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voluntary Sector Review
Voluntary Sector Review SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
40.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The journal covers the full range of issues relevant to voluntary sector studies, including: definitional and theoretical debates; management and organisational development; financial and human resources; philanthropy; volunteering and employment; regulation and charity law; service delivery; civic engagement; industry and sub-sector dimensions; relations with other sectors; social enterprise; evaluation and impact. Voluntary Sector Review covers voluntary sector studies from a variety of disciplines, including sociology, social policy, politics, psychology, economics, business studies, social anthropology, philosophy and ethics. The journal includes work from the UK and Europe, and beyond, where cross-national comparisons are illuminating. With dedicated expert policy and practice sections, Voluntary Sector Review also provides an essential forum for the exchange of ideas and new thinking.
期刊最新文献
The role of NGOs in homelessness services in Greece Collective co-production of health and care services – a systematic review of research from the United Kingdom, Germany and Norway The role of NGOs in homelessness services in Greece Collective co-production of health and care services – a systematic review of research from the United Kingdom, Germany and Norway Explaining a decline in volunteering in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1