Comparison of the Effectiveness of Beraksurf and Curosurf Exogenous Surfactants in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates: A Double-blind Randomized Study in the West of Iran.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS Current Pediatric Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.2174/0115733963271143240403070529
F. Eghbalian, B. Basiri, Behnaz Hatami, Narges Mohammadi Parsa, E. Jenabi
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Beraksurf and Curosurf Exogenous Surfactants in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates: A Double-blind Randomized Study in the West of Iran.","authors":"F. Eghbalian, B. Basiri, Behnaz Hatami, Narges Mohammadi Parsa, E. Jenabi","doi":"10.2174/0115733963271143240403070529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nTo date, few studies have compared the effectiveness of exogenous surfactant therapy with Curosurf and Beraksurf in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm neonates.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nSince surfactant has a significant impact on the treatment of neonates with RDS, this study was conducted to introduce a more effective method for treating preterm neonates with RDS.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe present clinical trial was conducted on 140 preterm neonates with RDS in the NICU department of two specialized university hospitals in Hamadan, western Iran. In one group, we used the Iranian-made surfactant Beraksurf, and in another group, we used the Italian-made surfactant Curosurf. In the end, the checklist for the two groups was completed. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22, and a significance level of 5% was considered for all tests.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe comparison of the frequency distribution of maternal corticosteroid administration, response to treatment and need for re-intubation, associated disorders, and mortality among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant did not show a significant difference (p=0.962, 0.763, 0.725 and 0.149, respectively). Further, the comparison of the mean number of days requiring respiratory support, days free from respiratory support, and hospitalization days among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant injection did not show a significant difference (p=0.910, 0.725, and 0.898, respectively). Additionally, the comparison of the time of initiation of feeding and the time of reaching maximum feeding among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant injection also did not show significant differences (p=0.881 and 0.903, respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBased on the fact that Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactants did not show significant differences in the treatment outcomes of RDS in preterm neonates, it is suggested that the Iranianmade surfactant, Beracsurf, should be used for the treatment of these neonates due to its cost-effectiveness and availability compared to Curosurf.","PeriodicalId":11175,"journal":{"name":"Current Pediatric Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pediatric Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733963271143240403070529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND To date, few studies have compared the effectiveness of exogenous surfactant therapy with Curosurf and Beraksurf in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm neonates. OBJECTIVE Since surfactant has a significant impact on the treatment of neonates with RDS, this study was conducted to introduce a more effective method for treating preterm neonates with RDS. METHODS The present clinical trial was conducted on 140 preterm neonates with RDS in the NICU department of two specialized university hospitals in Hamadan, western Iran. In one group, we used the Iranian-made surfactant Beraksurf, and in another group, we used the Italian-made surfactant Curosurf. In the end, the checklist for the two groups was completed. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22, and a significance level of 5% was considered for all tests. RESULTS The comparison of the frequency distribution of maternal corticosteroid administration, response to treatment and need for re-intubation, associated disorders, and mortality among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant did not show a significant difference (p=0.962, 0.763, 0.725 and 0.149, respectively). Further, the comparison of the mean number of days requiring respiratory support, days free from respiratory support, and hospitalization days among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant injection did not show a significant difference (p=0.910, 0.725, and 0.898, respectively). Additionally, the comparison of the time of initiation of feeding and the time of reaching maximum feeding among neonates of the two groups of Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactant injection also did not show significant differences (p=0.881 and 0.903, respectively). CONCLUSION Based on the fact that Beracsurf and Curosurf surfactants did not show significant differences in the treatment outcomes of RDS in preterm neonates, it is suggested that the Iranianmade surfactant, Beracsurf, should be used for the treatment of these neonates due to its cost-effectiveness and availability compared to Curosurf.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 Beraksurf 和 Curosurf 外源表面活性物质治疗早产新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果:伊朗西部的一项双盲随机研究。
背景迄今为止,很少有研究比较 Curosurf 和 Beraksurf 外源性表面活性物质治疗早产新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的效果。本临床试验针对伊朗西部哈马丹市两所大学专科医院 NICU 部门的 140 名早产 RDS 新生儿。一组使用伊朗生产的表面活性物质 Beraksurf,另一组使用意大利生产的表面活性物质 Curosurf。最后,完成了两组的核对表。结果两组使用 Beracsurf 和 Curosurf 表面活性剂的新生儿在母体使用皮质类固醇的频率分布、对治疗的反应和再次插管的需求、相关疾病和死亡率的比较未显示出显著差异(P 分别为 0.962、0.763、0.725 和 0.149)。此外,注射 Beracsurf 和 Curosurf 表面活性剂的两组新生儿需要呼吸支持的平均天数、无需呼吸支持的天数和住院天数的比较也未显示出显著差异(P 分别为 0.910、0.725 和 0.898)。此外,两组注射 Beracsurf 和 Curosurf 表面活性剂的新生儿开始进食的时间和达到最大进食量的时间比较也未显示出显著差异(P 分别为 0.881 和 0.903)。结论基于 Beracsurf 和 Curosurf 表面活性剂在早产新生儿 RDS 的治疗结果上没有显示出显著差异这一事实,建议使用伊朗产的 Beracsurf 表面活性剂治疗这些新生儿,因为与 Curosurf 相比,Beracsurf 具有成本效益和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Current Pediatric Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in pediatric medicine. The journal’s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Quantitative Review of Un-licensed and Off-label Medicines Use in Children Aged 0-2 Years in the Private Sector in South Africa: Extent, Challenges, and Implications. Laryngeal Mask for Minimally-Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Narrative Review. Strategies for Pain Management after Extraction of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. Clinical Picture, Diagnosis, Management of NEC, and Effects of Probiotics on its Prevention: A Narrative Review. Clinical Management of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1