Crossing the principle–practice gap in AI ethics with ethical problem-solving

Nicholas Kluge Corrêa, James William Santos, Camila Galvão, Marcelo Pasetti, Dieine Schiavon, Faizah Naqvi, Robayet Hossain, Nythamar De Oliveira
{"title":"Crossing the principle–practice gap in AI ethics with ethical problem-solving","authors":"Nicholas Kluge Corrêa,&nbsp;James William Santos,&nbsp;Camila Galvão,&nbsp;Marcelo Pasetti,&nbsp;Dieine Schiavon,&nbsp;Faizah Naqvi,&nbsp;Robayet Hossain,&nbsp;Nythamar De Oliveira","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00469-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The past years have presented a surge in (AI) development, fueled by breakthroughs in deep learning, increased computational power, and substantial investments in the field. Given the generative capabilities of more recent AI systems, the era of large-scale AI models has transformed various domains that intersect our daily lives. However, this progress raises concerns about the balance between technological advancement, ethical considerations, safety measures, and financial interests. Moreover, using such systems in sensitive areas amplifies our general ethical awareness, prompting a re-emergence of debates on governance, regulation, and human values. However, amidst this landscape, how to bridge the principle–practice gap separating ethical discourse from the technical side of AI development remains an open problem. In response to this challenge, the present work proposes a framework to help shorten this gap: <i>ethical problem-solving</i> (EPS). EPS is a methodology promoting responsible, human-centric, and value-oriented AI development. The framework’s core resides in translating principles into practical implementations using impact assessment surveys and a differential recommendation methodology. We utilize EPS as a blueprint to propose the implementation of an <i>Ethics as a Service Platform</i>, currently available as a simple demonstration. We released all framework components openly and with a permissive license, hoping the community would adopt and extend our efforts into other contexts. Available in the following URL https://nkluge-correa.github.io/ethical-problem-solving/.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 2","pages":"1271 - 1288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00469-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00469-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past years have presented a surge in (AI) development, fueled by breakthroughs in deep learning, increased computational power, and substantial investments in the field. Given the generative capabilities of more recent AI systems, the era of large-scale AI models has transformed various domains that intersect our daily lives. However, this progress raises concerns about the balance between technological advancement, ethical considerations, safety measures, and financial interests. Moreover, using such systems in sensitive areas amplifies our general ethical awareness, prompting a re-emergence of debates on governance, regulation, and human values. However, amidst this landscape, how to bridge the principle–practice gap separating ethical discourse from the technical side of AI development remains an open problem. In response to this challenge, the present work proposes a framework to help shorten this gap: ethical problem-solving (EPS). EPS is a methodology promoting responsible, human-centric, and value-oriented AI development. The framework’s core resides in translating principles into practical implementations using impact assessment surveys and a differential recommendation methodology. We utilize EPS as a blueprint to propose the implementation of an Ethics as a Service Platform, currently available as a simple demonstration. We released all framework components openly and with a permissive license, hoping the community would adopt and extend our efforts into other contexts. Available in the following URL https://nkluge-correa.github.io/ethical-problem-solving/.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用伦理问题解决方案跨越人工智能伦理的原则与实践鸿沟
过去几年,在深度学习的突破、计算能力的提高和对该领域的大量投资的推动下,人工智能的发展出现了激增。考虑到最近人工智能系统的生成能力,大规模人工智能模型的时代已经改变了与我们日常生活相关的各个领域。然而,这一进步引起了人们对技术进步、伦理考虑、安全措施和经济利益之间平衡的担忧。此外,在敏感领域使用此类系统增强了我们的普遍道德意识,促使有关治理、监管和人类价值观的辩论重新出现。然而,在这种情况下,如何弥合将伦理话语与人工智能发展的技术方面分开的原则-实践差距仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。为了应对这一挑战,本工作提出了一个框架来帮助缩短这一差距:道德问题解决(EPS)。EPS是一种促进负责任的、以人为本的、以价值为导向的人工智能开发方法。该框架的核心在于利用影响评估调查和差别建议方法将原则转化为实际实施。我们以“诚信即服务平台”为蓝本,提出推行“诚信即服务平台”的建议,并提供一个简单的示范。我们公开发布了所有框架组件,并使用了宽松的许可证,希望社区能够采用并将我们的努力扩展到其他环境中。可在以下URL https://nkluge-correa.github.io/ethical-problem-solving/中获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond black-box medicine: a bioethical considerations for informed consent in AI-driven endoscopy Rectifying illusion: a Buddhist–Confucian framework for LLM hallucinations A dynamic contextual responsibility framework for evaluating large language models in socio-technical contexts Political fantasies of fairness: artificial intelligence, law, and the myth of sovereign reason A critical analysis of the ethical benefits and challenges related to the development and use of wearable AI devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1