The impact of market concentration and market power on banking stability – evidence from Europe

Sarah Herwald, Simone Voigt, André Uhde
{"title":"The impact of market concentration and market power on banking stability – evidence from Europe","authors":"Sarah Herwald, Simone Voigt, André Uhde","doi":"10.1108/jrf-03-2023-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAcademic research has intensively analyzed the relationship between market concentration or market power and banking stability but provides ambiguous results, which are summarized under the concentration-stability/fragility view. We provide empirical evidence that the mixed results are due to the difficulty of identifying reliable variables to measure concentration and market power.Design/methodology/approachUsing data from 3,943 banks operating in the European Union (EU)-15 between 2013 and 2020, we employ linear regression models on panel data. Banking market concentration is measured by the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI), and market power is estimated by the product-specific Lerner Indices for the loan and deposit market, respectively.FindingsOur analysis reveals a significantly stability-decreasing impact of market concentration (HHI) and a significantly stability-increasing effect of market power (Lerner Indices). In addition, we provide evidence for a weak (or even absent) empirical relationship between the (non)structural measures, challenging the validity of the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) paradigm. Our baseline findings remain robust, especially when controlling for a likely reverse causality.Originality/valueOur results suggest that the HHI may reflect other factors beyond market power that influence banking stability. Thus, banking supervisors and competition authorities should investigate market concentration and market power simultaneously while considering their joint impact on banking stability.","PeriodicalId":22869,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Risk Finance","volume":"85 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-03-2023-0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeAcademic research has intensively analyzed the relationship between market concentration or market power and banking stability but provides ambiguous results, which are summarized under the concentration-stability/fragility view. We provide empirical evidence that the mixed results are due to the difficulty of identifying reliable variables to measure concentration and market power.Design/methodology/approachUsing data from 3,943 banks operating in the European Union (EU)-15 between 2013 and 2020, we employ linear regression models on panel data. Banking market concentration is measured by the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI), and market power is estimated by the product-specific Lerner Indices for the loan and deposit market, respectively.FindingsOur analysis reveals a significantly stability-decreasing impact of market concentration (HHI) and a significantly stability-increasing effect of market power (Lerner Indices). In addition, we provide evidence for a weak (or even absent) empirical relationship between the (non)structural measures, challenging the validity of the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) paradigm. Our baseline findings remain robust, especially when controlling for a likely reverse causality.Originality/valueOur results suggest that the HHI may reflect other factors beyond market power that influence banking stability. Thus, banking supervisors and competition authorities should investigate market concentration and market power simultaneously while considering their joint impact on banking stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场集中度和市场力量对银行业稳定性的影响--来自欧洲的证据
目的学术研究深入分析了市场集中度或市场力量与银行业稳定性之间的关系,但得出的结果模棱两可,归纳为集中度-稳定性-脆弱性观点。我们提供的实证证据表明,结果不一的原因在于难以确定可靠的变量来衡量集中度和市场力量。设计/方法/途径利用 2013 年至 2020 年期间在欧盟(EU)15 国运营的 3943 家银行的数据,我们对面板数据采用线性回归模型。银行业市场集中度由赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(HHI)衡量,市场力量则分别由贷款市场和存款市场的特定产品勒纳指数估算。此外,我们还提供了证据,证明(非)结构性措施之间的经验关系较弱(甚至不存在),这对结构-行为-绩效(SCP)范式的有效性提出了挑战。我们的基线研究结果依然稳健,尤其是在控制可能存在的反向因果关系时。原创性/价值我们的研究结果表明,HHI 可能反映了影响银行业稳定性的市场力量之外的其他因素。因此,银行监管机构和竞争管理机构应同时调查市场集中度和市场力量,同时考虑它们对银行业稳定性的共同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why do firms list their shares in the US? The role of political uncertainty How do green bonds promote common prosperity? Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities Geopolitical risk and banking performance: evidence from emerging economies Temporary employment and financial distress in times of crisis Is tax avoidance one of the purposes of financial data manipulation? The case of Romania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1