Contractual Gravities

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE EXTRAPOLATION Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI:10.3828/extr.2024.4
Eamon Reid
{"title":"Contractual Gravities","authors":"Eamon Reid","doi":"10.3828/extr.2024.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, I present a critical reading of the space opera television series\n Babylon 5\n (\n B5\n ) (1994–98) from a Millsian radical liberal perspective filtered through a flat ontology. I argue that\n B5\n ’s world is nonmodern, where various entities and their “gravities” affect how social forms are structured. The legal and contractual aspects of governance and politics are discussed, focusing on the issue of race. Whilst Charles Mills’s critique of racial contracts is fruitful, his political theory remains all-too human.\n B5\n illustrates that any future republic ought to be nonmodern and rhizomatic in character, including nonhumans as elements.\n","PeriodicalId":42992,"journal":{"name":"EXTRAPOLATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXTRAPOLATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I present a critical reading of the space opera television series Babylon 5 ( B5 ) (1994–98) from a Millsian radical liberal perspective filtered through a flat ontology. I argue that B5 ’s world is nonmodern, where various entities and their “gravities” affect how social forms are structured. The legal and contractual aspects of governance and politics are discussed, focusing on the issue of race. Whilst Charles Mills’s critique of racial contracts is fruitful, his political theory remains all-too human. B5 illustrates that any future republic ought to be nonmodern and rhizomatic in character, including nonhumans as elements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合同重力
在本文中,我从米尔斯激进自由主义的视角出发,通过平面本体论的过滤,对太空歌剧电视连续剧《巴比伦 5 号》(Babylon 5)(1994-98 年)进行了批判性解读。我认为《巴比伦 5》中的世界是非现代的,各种实体及其 "引力 "影响着社会形态的结构。我们讨论了治理和政治的法律和契约方面,重点是种族问题。虽然查尔斯-米尔斯对种族契约的批判富有成果,但他的政治理论仍然过于人性化。B5 说明,任何未来的共和国都应具有非现代性和根植性,将非人类作为要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EXTRAPOLATION
EXTRAPOLATION LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The Programming of Free Will in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Critiques of Domesticity in Ray Bradbury’s Cold War Fiction Nightmare Angels and Dreams of Flight: Transgressive Transcendence in J. G. Ballard’s Crash and The Unlimited Dream Compan y Nnedi Okorafor: Noor as Noir, Cyborg Hybridity, Identity, and Disability Death, History, and the Time Loop: The Subject/Object Relation in Vandana Singh’s “Somadeva: A Sky River Sutra”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1