Does the Dose of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Affect the Triple-negative Breast Cancer Benefit from Extended Capecitabine Metronomic Therapy? An Exploratory Analysis of the SYSUCC-001 Trial

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S447290
Ying Chen, Wen-Xia Li, Jia-Hua Wu, Geng-Hang Chen, Chun-Min Yang, Hai Lu, Xi Wang, Shu-sen Wang, Heng Huang, Li Cai, Li Zhao, Rou-Jun Peng, Ying Lin, Jun Tang, Jian Zeng, Le-hong Zhang, Y. Ke, Xian-Ming Wang, Xin-Mei Liu, An-Qin Zhang, Fei Xu, Xiwen Bi, Jiajia Huang, Ji-Bin Li, D. Pang, Cong Xue, Yan-Xia Shi, Zhenyu He, Huan-xin Lin, Xin An, W. Xia, Ye Cao, Yingwei Guo, R. Hong, Kui-Kui Jiang, Y. Zhong, Ge Zhang, P. Tienchaiananda, Masahiro Oikawa, Zhong-Yu Yuan, Qian-Jun Chen
{"title":"Does the Dose of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Affect the Triple-negative Breast Cancer Benefit from Extended Capecitabine Metronomic Therapy? An Exploratory Analysis of the SYSUCC-001 Trial","authors":"Ying Chen, Wen-Xia Li, Jia-Hua Wu, Geng-Hang Chen, Chun-Min Yang, Hai Lu, Xi Wang, Shu-sen Wang, Heng Huang, Li Cai, Li Zhao, Rou-Jun Peng, Ying Lin, Jun Tang, Jian Zeng, Le-hong Zhang, Y. Ke, Xian-Ming Wang, Xin-Mei Liu, An-Qin Zhang, Fei Xu, Xiwen Bi, Jiajia Huang, Ji-Bin Li, D. Pang, Cong Xue, Yan-Xia Shi, Zhenyu He, Huan-xin Lin, Xin An, W. Xia, Ye Cao, Yingwei Guo, R. Hong, Kui-Kui Jiang, Y. Zhong, Ge Zhang, P. Tienchaiananda, Masahiro Oikawa, Zhong-Yu Yuan, Qian-Jun Chen","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S447290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Results from studies of extended capecitabine after the standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were inconsistent, and only low-dose capecitabine from the SYSUCC-001 trial improved disease-free survival (DFS). Adjustment of the conventional adjuvant chemotherapy doses affect the prognosis and may affect the efficacy of subsequent treatments. This study investigated whether the survival benefit of the SYSUCC-001 trial was affected by dose adjustment of the standard adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Patients and Methods We reviewed the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens before the extended capecitabine in the SYSUCC-001 trial. Patients were classified into “consistent” (standard acceptable dose) and “inconsistent” (doses lower than acceptable dose) dose based on the minimum acceptable dose range in the landmark clinical trials. Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of dose on the survival outcomes. Results All 434 patients in SYSUCC-001 trial were enrolled in this study. Most of patients administered the anthracycline-taxane regimen accounted for 88.94%. Among patients in the “inconsistent” dose, 60.8% and 47% received lower doses of anthracycline and taxane separately. In the observation group, the “inconsistent” dose of anthracycline and taxane did not affect DFS compared with the “consistent” dose. Moreover, in the capecitabine group, the “inconsistent” anthracycline dose did not affect DFS compared with the “consistent” dose. However, patients with “consistent” taxane doses benefited significantly from extended capecitabine (P=0.014). The sufficient dose of adjuvant taxane had a positive effect of extended capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 4.06). Conclusion This study found the dose reduction of adjuvant taxane might negatively impact the efficacy of capecitabine. Therefore, the reduction of anthracycline dose over paclitaxel should be given priority during conventional adjuvant chemotherapy, if patients need dose reduction and plan for extended capecitabine.","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S447290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Results from studies of extended capecitabine after the standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were inconsistent, and only low-dose capecitabine from the SYSUCC-001 trial improved disease-free survival (DFS). Adjustment of the conventional adjuvant chemotherapy doses affect the prognosis and may affect the efficacy of subsequent treatments. This study investigated whether the survival benefit of the SYSUCC-001 trial was affected by dose adjustment of the standard adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Patients and Methods We reviewed the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens before the extended capecitabine in the SYSUCC-001 trial. Patients were classified into “consistent” (standard acceptable dose) and “inconsistent” (doses lower than acceptable dose) dose based on the minimum acceptable dose range in the landmark clinical trials. Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of dose on the survival outcomes. Results All 434 patients in SYSUCC-001 trial were enrolled in this study. Most of patients administered the anthracycline-taxane regimen accounted for 88.94%. Among patients in the “inconsistent” dose, 60.8% and 47% received lower doses of anthracycline and taxane separately. In the observation group, the “inconsistent” dose of anthracycline and taxane did not affect DFS compared with the “consistent” dose. Moreover, in the capecitabine group, the “inconsistent” anthracycline dose did not affect DFS compared with the “consistent” dose. However, patients with “consistent” taxane doses benefited significantly from extended capecitabine (P=0.014). The sufficient dose of adjuvant taxane had a positive effect of extended capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 4.06). Conclusion This study found the dose reduction of adjuvant taxane might negatively impact the efficacy of capecitabine. Therefore, the reduction of anthracycline dose over paclitaxel should be given priority during conventional adjuvant chemotherapy, if patients need dose reduction and plan for extended capecitabine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准辅助化疗的剂量会影响三阴性乳腺癌从卡培他滨延伸剂量组治疗中获益吗?SYSUCC-001试验的探索性分析
目的 早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)标准辅助化疗后延长卡培他滨的研究结果不一致,只有SYSUCC-001试验中的低剂量卡培他滨改善了无病生存期(DFS)。调整常规辅助化疗剂量会影响预后,并可能影响后续治疗的疗效。本研究探讨了SYSUCC-001试验的生存获益是否会受到标准辅助化疗剂量调整的影响。患者和方法 我们回顾了SYSUCC-001试验中延长卡培他滨疗程前的辅助化疗方案。根据具有里程碑意义的临床试验中的最小可接受剂量范围,将患者分为 "一致"(标准可接受剂量)和 "不一致"(剂量低于可接受剂量)两类。采用 Cox 比例危险模型研究剂量对生存结果的影响。结果 SYSUCC-001试验的所有434名患者都参加了本研究。大多数患者接受了蒽环类-他烷类疗法,占88.94%。在 "剂量不一致 "的患者中,分别有 60.8%和 47%的患者接受了较低剂量的蒽环类和紫杉类药物。在观察组中,与 "一致 "剂量相比,蒽环类和紫杉类药物的 "不一致 "剂量不会影响 DFS。此外,在卡培他滨组,与 "一致 "剂量相比,蒽环类药物剂量 "不一致 "不影响 DFS。然而,"一致 "紫杉类药物剂量的患者从延长的卡培他滨治疗中明显获益(P=0.014)。足够剂量的辅助类固醇对延长卡培他滨有积极影响(危险比[HR]2.04;95%置信区间[CI]1.02至4.06)。结论 本研究发现,减少辅助性紫杉类药物的剂量可能会对卡培他滨的疗效产生负面影响。因此,在常规辅助化疗期间,如果患者需要减量并计划延长卡培他滨的疗程,应优先考虑减少蒽环类药物的剂量而非紫杉醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Plasma Exosome miR-203a-3p is a Potential Liquid Biopsy Marker for Assessing Tumor Progression in Breast Cancer Patients. Comparative Analysis and Future Prospects of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) and Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2 (Trop-2) Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer Treatment. Ultra-Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy with Automated Hybrid-VMAT Technique: A Pilot Study on Safety, Skin Toxicity and Aesthetic Outcomes. Elevated Risk of Adverse Prognosis in Patients with T2-3 Stage Breast Cancer Exhibiting Non-Pathological Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Significance of Regenerating Islet-Derived Family Member 4. Unraveling the Role of PCDH9 in Breast Cancer and Identifying Therapeutic Strategies for PCDH9-Deficient Tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1