Improving Tip Aesthetics Using Mastoid Fascia Tissue Graft in Rhinoplasty: A Reliable Alternative to Soft Cartilage Grafts

Paige Goote, Buğra Tugertimur, Shaishav Datta, Steven Hanna, Matthew Morris, David Mattos, R. Reish
{"title":"Improving Tip Aesthetics Using Mastoid Fascia Tissue Graft in Rhinoplasty: A Reliable Alternative to Soft Cartilage Grafts","authors":"Paige Goote, Buğra Tugertimur, Shaishav Datta, Steven Hanna, Matthew Morris, David Mattos, R. Reish","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojae007.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Goals/Purpose Traditional rhinoplasty tip grafts often lead to visibility issues, prompting patients to seek revision surgery. The mastoid fascia tissue graft (MFTG) provides a natural-looking alternative with fewer complications. MFTG remains less visible through the skin, enhancing long-term aesthetic results. This eight-year study on 193 patients examines MFTG's effectiveness in nasal tip refinement, evaluating revision and infection rates. Methods/Technique A retrospective analysis of MFTG use for nasal tip refinement during open rhinoplasty in the senior author's practice was conducted from July 2014 to June 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed open rhinoplasty cases using mastoid tissue for tip refinement with at least 12 months of follow-up. Among 2003 cases, 193 met these criteria and were evaluated for subsequent revision and infection rates. Results/Complications The average patient age was 34.2 years (175 females, 18 males). Primary rhinoplasties were done on 114 patients, with 79 receiving revision surgeries. Average follow-up was 14.8 months. 6 patients (3.1%) needed extended antibiotics. Overall, 6 (3.1%) patients required revision rhinoplasty, comprising of 2 (1.8%) primary and 4 (5.1%) secondary rhinoplasty patients. These revisions were unrelated to the use of MFTG for nasal tip refinement. Conclusion MFTG use for nasal tip refinement is associated with low revision rates for both primary and secondary rhinoplasty compared to rates in current literature, without increase in complications or prolonged operative durations. MFTG for nasal tip refinement is a safe and convenient technique delivering excellent aesthetic outcomes with minimal morbidity.","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"5 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae007.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Goals/Purpose Traditional rhinoplasty tip grafts often lead to visibility issues, prompting patients to seek revision surgery. The mastoid fascia tissue graft (MFTG) provides a natural-looking alternative with fewer complications. MFTG remains less visible through the skin, enhancing long-term aesthetic results. This eight-year study on 193 patients examines MFTG's effectiveness in nasal tip refinement, evaluating revision and infection rates. Methods/Technique A retrospective analysis of MFTG use for nasal tip refinement during open rhinoplasty in the senior author's practice was conducted from July 2014 to June 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed open rhinoplasty cases using mastoid tissue for tip refinement with at least 12 months of follow-up. Among 2003 cases, 193 met these criteria and were evaluated for subsequent revision and infection rates. Results/Complications The average patient age was 34.2 years (175 females, 18 males). Primary rhinoplasties were done on 114 patients, with 79 receiving revision surgeries. Average follow-up was 14.8 months. 6 patients (3.1%) needed extended antibiotics. Overall, 6 (3.1%) patients required revision rhinoplasty, comprising of 2 (1.8%) primary and 4 (5.1%) secondary rhinoplasty patients. These revisions were unrelated to the use of MFTG for nasal tip refinement. Conclusion MFTG use for nasal tip refinement is associated with low revision rates for both primary and secondary rhinoplasty compared to rates in current literature, without increase in complications or prolonged operative durations. MFTG for nasal tip refinement is a safe and convenient technique delivering excellent aesthetic outcomes with minimal morbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在鼻整形术中使用乳突筋膜组织移植物改善鼻尖美感:软骨移植的可靠替代品
摘要 目标/目的 传统的鼻整形术中,鼻尖移植往往会导致可见度问题,促使患者寻求翻修手术。乳突筋膜组织移植(MFTG)提供了一种自然美观、并发症较少的替代方法。乳突筋膜组织移植在皮肤中的可见度较低,从而提高了长期的美学效果。本研究对 193 名患者进行了为期八年的研究,考察了 MFTG 在鼻尖整形中的效果,评估了翻修率和感染率。方法/技术 从 2014 年 7 月到 2022 年 6 月,作者对开放式鼻整形术中使用 MFTG 进行鼻尖修整的情况进行了回顾性分析。纳入标准包括使用乳突组织进行鼻尖修整且随访至少 12 个月的开放式鼻整形病例。在 2003 例病例中,有 193 例符合上述标准,并对后续的翻修率和感染率进行了评估。结果/并发症 患者平均年龄为 34.2 岁(175 名女性,18 名男性)。114 名患者进行了初次鼻整形手术,其中 79 人接受了翻修手术。平均随访时间为 14.8 个月。6名患者(3.1%)需要延长抗生素治疗时间。总共有 6 名患者(3.1%)需要进行鼻整形翻修手术,其中包括 2 名初次鼻整形患者(1.8%)和 4 名二次鼻整形患者(5.1%)。这些翻修与使用 MFTG 修整鼻尖无关。结论 与目前的文献相比,使用 MFTG 进行鼻尖精细化与初级和次级鼻整形术的低翻修率有关,且不会增加并发症或延长手术时间。MFTG 用于鼻尖精细化是一种安全、便捷的技术,可带来极佳的美学效果,且发病率极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Commentary on: The Role of Nasal Fat Preservation in Upper Lid Surgery and Assessment With the FACE-Q Questionnaire: Innovations in Upper Blepharoplasty. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts for Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty. Commentary on: The Gargano Yin Yang Breast Reduction Technique: How to Obtain Better Breast Shape, Volume Distribution, and Size With Long-Lasting Results. Bibliometric Analysis of the Highest Cited Cosmetic Upper Facial Plastic Surgery Articles Over 50 Years. Might Topical Heparin Help With Occlusion Emergencies After Accidental Intra-Arterial Hyaluronic Acid Injections?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1