Long-Term Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Outpatient Care for Youth with Anxiety Disorders.

IF 18.2 1区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Energy Letters Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1159/000537932
K. Krause, Xiao Chi Zhang, Silvia Schneider
{"title":"Long-Term Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Outpatient Care for Youth with Anxiety Disorders.","authors":"K. Krause, Xiao Chi Zhang, Silvia Schneider","doi":"10.1159/000537932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThis study examined the long-term effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (≥ 2 years after the end of therapy) in the routine care of youth (mean 11.95 years; SD = 3.04 years) with primary anxiety disorder (AD).\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwo hundred and ten children with any AD as a primary diagnosis and with any comorbidity were included in the \"Kids Beating Anxiety (KibA)\" clinical trial and received evidence-based CBT. Diagnoses, severity of diagnoses, and further dimensional outcome variables of symptoms and functioning were assessed before (baseline), after the last treatment session (POST), and at two follow-up (FU) assessments in the child and caregiver report: 6 months (6MONTHS-FU) and >2 years (mean 4.31; SD = 1.07 years) after the last treatment session (long-term FU).\n\n\nRESULTS\nAt POST, 61.38% showed total remission of all and any ADs. At long-term FU, the remission rate was 63.64%. Compared to baseline, ratings of severity, anxiety, impairment/burden, and life quality improved significantly after CBT in child and caregiver report. All pre-post/FU improvements and global success ratings were stable in child (Pre-Post: Hedges' g = 3.57; Pre-6MONTHS-FU: Hedges' g = 3.43; Pre-LT-FU: Hedges' g = 2.34) and caregiver report (Pre-Post: Hedges' g = 2.00; Pre-6MONTHS-FU: Hedges' g = 2.31; Pre-LT-FU: Hedges' g = 2.31) across all POST- and FU-assessment points. Some outcomes showed further significant improvement, and no deterioration was found over the course of time. Effect sizes calculated in the present study correspond to, or even exceed, effect sizes reported in previous meta-analysis.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nStable long-term effects of \"KibA\" CBT for youth with ADs, comparable to those results from efficacy studies, were achieved in a routine practice setting by applying treatment manuals tested in randomized controlled trials. These findings are remarkable, as the patient group studied here consisted of an age group within the main risk phase of developing further mental disorders, and therefore an increase in new-onset anxiety and further mental disorders would be expected over the long time span studied here.","PeriodicalId":16,"journal":{"name":"ACS Energy Letters ","volume":"14 18","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":18.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Energy Letters ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537932","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION This study examined the long-term effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (≥ 2 years after the end of therapy) in the routine care of youth (mean 11.95 years; SD = 3.04 years) with primary anxiety disorder (AD). METHODS Two hundred and ten children with any AD as a primary diagnosis and with any comorbidity were included in the "Kids Beating Anxiety (KibA)" clinical trial and received evidence-based CBT. Diagnoses, severity of diagnoses, and further dimensional outcome variables of symptoms and functioning were assessed before (baseline), after the last treatment session (POST), and at two follow-up (FU) assessments in the child and caregiver report: 6 months (6MONTHS-FU) and >2 years (mean 4.31; SD = 1.07 years) after the last treatment session (long-term FU). RESULTS At POST, 61.38% showed total remission of all and any ADs. At long-term FU, the remission rate was 63.64%. Compared to baseline, ratings of severity, anxiety, impairment/burden, and life quality improved significantly after CBT in child and caregiver report. All pre-post/FU improvements and global success ratings were stable in child (Pre-Post: Hedges' g = 3.57; Pre-6MONTHS-FU: Hedges' g = 3.43; Pre-LT-FU: Hedges' g = 2.34) and caregiver report (Pre-Post: Hedges' g = 2.00; Pre-6MONTHS-FU: Hedges' g = 2.31; Pre-LT-FU: Hedges' g = 2.31) across all POST- and FU-assessment points. Some outcomes showed further significant improvement, and no deterioration was found over the course of time. Effect sizes calculated in the present study correspond to, or even exceed, effect sizes reported in previous meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS Stable long-term effects of "KibA" CBT for youth with ADs, comparable to those results from efficacy studies, were achieved in a routine practice setting by applying treatment manuals tested in randomized controlled trials. These findings are remarkable, as the patient group studied here consisted of an age group within the main risk phase of developing further mental disorders, and therefore an increase in new-onset anxiety and further mental disorders would be expected over the long time span studied here.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知行为疗法在焦虑症青少年常规门诊治疗中的长期疗效。
本研究探讨了认知行为疗法(CBT)在原发性焦虑症(AD)青少年(平均 11.95 岁;SD = 3.04 岁)常规治疗中的长期有效性(治疗结束后≥ 2 年)。方法210 名儿童被纳入 "儿童战胜焦虑(KibA)"临床试验,并接受了循证 CBT 治疗。诊断、诊断的严重程度以及症状和功能的其他维度结果变量分别在治疗前(基线)、最后一次治疗后(POST)和两次随访(FU)评估中进行了评估,并由儿童和照顾者进行报告:结果在最后一次治疗后的 6 个月(6 个月-FU)和 2 年以上(平均 4.31;SD = 1.07 年)(长期 FU)。在长期FU中,缓解率为63.64%。与基线相比,儿童和护理人员在接受 CBT 治疗后,对病情严重程度、焦虑、障碍/负担和生活质量的评分均有明显改善。在儿童中,所有治疗前/治疗后的改善和总体成功评分均保持稳定(治疗前-治疗后:Hedges' g = 3.5):前:海吉斯 g = 3.57;前-6 个月-FU:海吉斯 g = 3.43;前-LT-FU:海吉斯 g = 2.34)和照顾者报告(前-后:海吉斯 g = 2.34;前-6 个月-FU:海吉斯 g = 3.43;前-LT-FU:海吉斯 g = 2.34):在所有治疗后和治疗前评估点,护理人员的报告(治疗前:赫奇斯 g = 2.00;治疗前:赫奇斯 g = 2.31;治疗前:赫奇斯 g = 2.31)均有显著改善。一些结果显示出进一步的明显改善,没有发现随着时间的推移而恶化的情况。本研究计算出的效应大小与之前荟萃分析报告的效应大小相当,甚至超过了这些效应大小。结论通过应用在随机对照试验中测试过的治疗手册,"KibA" CBT 对患有注意力缺失症的青少年产生了可观的长期效果,与疗效研究的结果相当。这些研究结果令人瞩目,因为本文研究的患者群体属于罹患其他精神障碍的主要风险阶段,因此预计在本文研究的较长时间跨度内,新发焦虑症和其他精神障碍会有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Energy Letters
ACS Energy Letters Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
469
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: ACS Energy Letters is a monthly journal that publishes papers reporting new scientific advances in energy research. The journal focuses on topics that are of interest to scientists working in the fundamental and applied sciences. Rapid publication is a central criterion for acceptance, and the journal is known for its quick publication times, with an average of 4-6 weeks from submission to web publication in As Soon As Publishable format. ACS Energy Letters is ranked as the number one journal in the Web of Science Electrochemistry category. It also ranks within the top 10 journals for Physical Chemistry, Energy & Fuels, and Nanoscience & Nanotechnology. The journal offers several types of articles, including Letters, Energy Express, Perspectives, Reviews, Editorials, Viewpoints and Energy Focus. Additionally, authors have the option to submit videos that summarize or support the information presented in a Perspective or Review article, which can be highlighted on the journal's website. ACS Energy Letters is abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder, EBSCO-summon, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Portico.
期刊最新文献
Covalent Organic Framework-Templated Molecular Contacts for Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells Rapid Parameter Prediction in Perovskite Solar Cells via AI-Assisted Performance Analysis Ion Beam Engineering of Catalyst Modification for Water Electrolysis: Recent Achievements and Future Performance Progress in High-Efficiency Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells: Charge Transport, Interface Engineering, and Stability Electrochemistry Is Heating Up: Ionic Liquids Can Help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1