Effects of Leading-Edge Blowing Control and Reduced Frequency on Aerofoil Aerodynamic Performances

Yang Chen, E. Avital, John Williams, Srimanta Santra, Avraham Seifert
{"title":"Effects of Leading-Edge Blowing Control and Reduced Frequency on Aerofoil Aerodynamic Performances","authors":"Yang Chen, E. Avital, John Williams, Srimanta Santra, Avraham Seifert","doi":"10.1115/1.4065294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aerofoil leading-edge fluid-blowing control is computationally studied to improve aerodynamic efficiency. The fluid injection momentum coefficient Cu (the ratio of injection to incoming square velocities times the slot's width to aerofoil's half chord-length), varies from 0.5% to 5.4%. Both static and dynamic conditions are investigated for a NACA0018 aerofoil at low speed and Reynolds number of 250k based on the aerofoil's chord-length. The aerofoil is dynamically pitched at at a reduced frequency (the pitching tangential speed to the free-stream speed ratio), varying between 0.0078 to 0.2. RANS and Unsteady RANS (URANS) are used in the simulations as based on the Transition SST and Spalart-Allmaras models, generally achieving good agreement with experimental results in lift and drag coefficients and in the pressure coefficient distributions along the aerofoil. It is found that oscillating the aerofoil can delay stall, as expected, in dynamic stall. Leading-edge blowing control can also significantly delay stall both in static and dynamic conditions as long as sufficient momentum is applied to the control. On the other hand, for a small Cu such as 0.5%, the leading-edge control worsens the performance and hastens the appearance of stall in both static and dynamic conditions. The aerofoil's oscillation reduces the differences between pitch-up and pitch-down aerodynamic performances. Detailed analysis of vorticity, pressure, velocity and streamline contours are given to provide plausible explanations and insight to the flow.","PeriodicalId":504378,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids Engineering","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aerofoil leading-edge fluid-blowing control is computationally studied to improve aerodynamic efficiency. The fluid injection momentum coefficient Cu (the ratio of injection to incoming square velocities times the slot's width to aerofoil's half chord-length), varies from 0.5% to 5.4%. Both static and dynamic conditions are investigated for a NACA0018 aerofoil at low speed and Reynolds number of 250k based on the aerofoil's chord-length. The aerofoil is dynamically pitched at at a reduced frequency (the pitching tangential speed to the free-stream speed ratio), varying between 0.0078 to 0.2. RANS and Unsteady RANS (URANS) are used in the simulations as based on the Transition SST and Spalart-Allmaras models, generally achieving good agreement with experimental results in lift and drag coefficients and in the pressure coefficient distributions along the aerofoil. It is found that oscillating the aerofoil can delay stall, as expected, in dynamic stall. Leading-edge blowing control can also significantly delay stall both in static and dynamic conditions as long as sufficient momentum is applied to the control. On the other hand, for a small Cu such as 0.5%, the leading-edge control worsens the performance and hastens the appearance of stall in both static and dynamic conditions. The aerofoil's oscillation reduces the differences between pitch-up and pitch-down aerodynamic performances. Detailed analysis of vorticity, pressure, velocity and streamline contours are given to provide plausible explanations and insight to the flow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前缘吹风控制和降低频率对机翼气动性能的影响
对气膜前缘流体喷射控制进行了计算研究,以提高气动效率。流体喷射动量系数 Cu(喷射速度与进入速度的平方乘以槽宽与气膜半弦长之比)的变化范围为 0.5% 至 5.4%。根据气膜的弦长,在低速和雷诺数为 250k 时对 NACA0018 气膜的静态和动态条件进行了研究。气膜的动态俯仰频率(俯仰切向速度与自由流速度之比)在 0.0078 到 0.2 之间变化。模拟中使用了基于过渡 SST 和 Spalart-Allmaras 模型的 RANS 和非稳态 RANS(URANS),在升力和阻力系数以及气膜沿线的压力系数分布方面与实验结果基本吻合。研究发现,在动态失速情况下,摆动气膜可以延迟失速。只要对控制施加足够的动力,前缘吹气控制也能在静态和动态条件下显著延迟失速。另一方面,当 Cu 值很小(如 0.5%)时,前缘控制会恶化性能,加速静态和动态失速的出现。气膜的振荡减少了俯仰和俯仰气动性能之间的差异。对涡度、压力、速度和流线轮廓进行了详细分析,为流动提供了合理的解释和见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Tire Attributes on the Aerodynamic Performance of a Generic Car-Tire Assembly1 Hydrodynamic Design and Pulsation Evolution in an Axial-Flow Pump Based On Control Mechanism of Flow-Induced Excitation Numerical Investigation of the Impact of the Rectangular Nozzle Aspect Ratio On Liquid Jet in Crossflow Numerical Study On the Effect of Channel Configuration On Mixture Formation of an Axial Flow Wave Rotor Combustor Study of Temperature Drop Region in Transitional Region in Fluid-film Thrust Bearings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1