Hegemonic Discourses Surrounding United States’ Leadership in Post-Ebola Development in Liberia

IF 0.8 Q1 HISTORY New Global Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1515/ngs-2023-0030
E. Amevor
{"title":"Hegemonic Discourses Surrounding United States’ Leadership in Post-Ebola Development in Liberia","authors":"E. Amevor","doi":"10.1515/ngs-2023-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines the hegemonic discourses surrounding USAID’s leadership in post-Ebola Liberia between 2015 and 2020. Using documents and critical discourse analysis, the study finds that USAID’s overarching goal of empowering Liberians, especially women, was primarily on humanitarian grounds. However, the study revealed the significant extent to which ideological and political economic assumptions influenced USAID’s prioritization of Liberia in the fight against Ebola in West Africa. These findings call for advancing research on the concept of national interest in international development discourse and practice, as well as the political economy of aid to sub-Saharan Africa from a neocolonialist lens.","PeriodicalId":42013,"journal":{"name":"New Global Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2023-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the hegemonic discourses surrounding USAID’s leadership in post-Ebola Liberia between 2015 and 2020. Using documents and critical discourse analysis, the study finds that USAID’s overarching goal of empowering Liberians, especially women, was primarily on humanitarian grounds. However, the study revealed the significant extent to which ideological and political economic assumptions influenced USAID’s prioritization of Liberia in the fight against Ebola in West Africa. These findings call for advancing research on the concept of national interest in international development discourse and practice, as well as the political economy of aid to sub-Saharan Africa from a neocolonialist lens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围绕美国在利比里亚埃博拉疫情后发展中的领导作用的霸权论述
本研究探讨了 2015 年至 2020 年期间围绕美国国际开发署在埃博拉疫情后的利比里亚领导工作的霸权话语。通过使用文件和批判性话语分析,研究发现美国国际开发署增强利比里亚人(尤其是妇女)权能的总体目标主要是基于人道主义理由。然而,研究揭示了意识形态和政治经济假设在多大程度上影响了美国国际开发署在西非抗击埃博拉的斗争中优先考虑利比里亚。这些研究结果要求推进对国际发展话语和实践中国家利益概念的研究,以及从新殖民主义视角出发对撒哈拉以南非洲援助的政治经济学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Obsolete Pasts? Globalization as an Analytical Prism in Vincenzo Formaleoni’s History of the Black Sea (1788–89) Fadi Lama. Why the West Can’t Win: From Bretton Woods to a Multipolar World Hegemonic Discourses Surrounding United States’ Leadership in Post-Ebola Development in Liberia Thinking Planetary About Global Futures: Posthuman Cosmopolitanism The Political Economy of Trade, Work and Economy: De-globalization – or Re-globalization?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1