The Role of Judges in Selecting Efficient Norms in a Common Law System: A Law and Economics Perspective

Diogo Augusto Vidal Padre, Leandro Chaves Rêgo
{"title":"The Role of Judges in Selecting Efficient Norms in a Common Law System: A Law and Economics Perspective","authors":"Diogo Augusto Vidal Padre, Leandro Chaves Rêgo","doi":"10.1515/ajle-2023-0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study delves into the common law efficiency theory, proposing that the efficiency of legal norms in common law systems predominantly depends on judges’ biases towards efficiency. By developing an economic model, it is demonstrated that the proportion of efficient norms correlates with the predisposition of judges towards efficiency, influenced by their personal beliefs. Historical analysis of common and civil law systems reveals that neither inherently guarantees efficiency; rather, their efficiency is contingent upon their adaptability to societal needs and prevailing judicial ideologies. The paper concludes that the efficiency of a legal system relies on its congruence with societal values and judicial ideologies, emphasizing that shifts in the judiciary’s ideological makeup have implications on legal system efficiency. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted process shaping legal norms in common law, highlighting the critical role of judges, societal values, and legislative dynamics.","PeriodicalId":41431,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Law and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2023-0179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into the common law efficiency theory, proposing that the efficiency of legal norms in common law systems predominantly depends on judges’ biases towards efficiency. By developing an economic model, it is demonstrated that the proportion of efficient norms correlates with the predisposition of judges towards efficiency, influenced by their personal beliefs. Historical analysis of common and civil law systems reveals that neither inherently guarantees efficiency; rather, their efficiency is contingent upon their adaptability to societal needs and prevailing judicial ideologies. The paper concludes that the efficiency of a legal system relies on its congruence with societal values and judicial ideologies, emphasizing that shifts in the judiciary’s ideological makeup have implications on legal system efficiency. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted process shaping legal norms in common law, highlighting the critical role of judges, societal values, and legislative dynamics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法官在普通法体系中选择有效规范的作用:法律与经济学视角
本研究深入探讨了普通法效率理论,提出普通法体系中法律规范的效率主要取决于法官对效率的偏好。通过建立一个经济模型,证明了高效规范的比例与法官受其个人信仰影响的效率倾向相关。对英美法系和大陆法系的历史分析表明,这两种法系在本质上都不能保证效率;相反,它们的效率取决于对社会需求和流行的司法意识形态的适应性。本文的结论是,法律制度的效率取决于其与社会价值观和司法意识形态的一致性,并强调司法机构意识形态构成的变化会对法律制度的效率产生影响。这项研究有助于加深对普通法中法律规范形成过程的多方面理解,突出了法官、社会价值观和立法动态的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Places We’ll Go The Role of Judges in Selecting Efficient Norms in a Common Law System: A Law and Economics Perspective Does Antitakeover Provision Harm Shareholders? Indexing for Antitakeover Provisions in China Comments on the Signaling Theory of IPO Underpricing and Investor Protection Laws Comments on the Signaling Theory of IPO Underpricing and Investor Protection Laws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1