Kangaroo Mother Care Practices in Tertiary Care NICUs Across India: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-based Survey

Q4 Medicine Journal of Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1177/09732179241238522
Kirthana Rao Kodhati, Prashanth Rr, V. Vamsi Krishna, R. Nanavati
{"title":"Kangaroo Mother Care Practices in Tertiary Care NICUs Across India: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-based Survey","authors":"Kirthana Rao Kodhati, Prashanth Rr, V. Vamsi Krishna, R. Nanavati","doi":"10.1177/09732179241238522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: KMC is a global standard for LBW and preterm neonates, supported by evidence for reducing morbidities and mortality. Integrated into India’s Newborn Action Plan since 2014, aiming for single-digit neonatal mortality by 2030, KMC practices in India have not reached the optimal levels. Hence, we attempted to study the KMC practices in tertiary care NICUs across India. Methods: A cross-sectional online national survey among neonatologists in level III NICUs in India was conducted. Utilizing Google Forms and a structured questionnaire of 30 questions on KMC, one respondent per unit participated. Results: Of the 110 NICUs invited to participate, a total of 52 units responded (47.3%). All units have a written KMC policy and conventionally provide KMC to neonates with BW < 2000 g, while 36.5% units provide KMC for neonates with BW between 2000 and 2500 g. Though 86.5% of NICUs provide KMC to infants on respiratory support, only 13.5% practice KMC for mechanically ventilated neonates. The time to initiate KMC within 48–72 hours is prevalent in 44.2% of NICUs, with 54% of NICUs providing an average KMC duration of 4–8 hours/day. A significantly lower percentage of NICUs (28.9%) have a KMC follow-up program. Conclusion: The study highlights the need to boost the ongoing KMC training programs for HCWs to increase the coverage of KMC for LBWs and sick preterm neonates. This includes requiring more uniform and structured KMC practices across the country, especially upscaling of infrastructure, earlier initiation and longer duration of KMC, better monitoring of neonates in KMC, and strengthening the follow-up program.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179241238522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: KMC is a global standard for LBW and preterm neonates, supported by evidence for reducing morbidities and mortality. Integrated into India’s Newborn Action Plan since 2014, aiming for single-digit neonatal mortality by 2030, KMC practices in India have not reached the optimal levels. Hence, we attempted to study the KMC practices in tertiary care NICUs across India. Methods: A cross-sectional online national survey among neonatologists in level III NICUs in India was conducted. Utilizing Google Forms and a structured questionnaire of 30 questions on KMC, one respondent per unit participated. Results: Of the 110 NICUs invited to participate, a total of 52 units responded (47.3%). All units have a written KMC policy and conventionally provide KMC to neonates with BW < 2000 g, while 36.5% units provide KMC for neonates with BW between 2000 and 2500 g. Though 86.5% of NICUs provide KMC to infants on respiratory support, only 13.5% practice KMC for mechanically ventilated neonates. The time to initiate KMC within 48–72 hours is prevalent in 44.2% of NICUs, with 54% of NICUs providing an average KMC duration of 4–8 hours/day. A significantly lower percentage of NICUs (28.9%) have a KMC follow-up program. Conclusion: The study highlights the need to boost the ongoing KMC training programs for HCWs to increase the coverage of KMC for LBWs and sick preterm neonates. This includes requiring more uniform and structured KMC practices across the country, especially upscaling of infrastructure, earlier initiation and longer duration of KMC, better monitoring of neonates in KMC, and strengthening the follow-up program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度三级护理新生儿重症监护室的袋鼠妈妈护理实践:基于问卷的横断面调查
背景:KMC 是针对低体重儿和早产新生儿的全球标准,在降低发病率和死亡率方面有据可依。自 2014 年起,KMC 被纳入印度新生儿行动计划,目标是到 2030 年将新生儿死亡率降至个位数,但印度的 KMC 实践尚未达到最佳水平。因此,我们试图研究印度三级护理新生儿重症监护病房的 KMC 实践。研究方法在印度三级新生儿监护病房的新生儿科医生中开展了一项横断面全国在线调查。利用谷歌表格和包含 30 个 KMC 问题的结构化问卷,每个单位有一名受访者参与调查。结果:在受邀参与调查的 110 个新生儿重症监护室中,共有 52 个单位(47.3%)做出了回应。虽然 86.5% 的新生儿重症监护室为使用呼吸支持的婴儿提供 KMC,但只有 13.5% 的新生儿重症监护室为使用机械通气的新生儿提供 KMC。44.2% 的新生儿重症监护病房在 48-72 小时内启动 KMC,54% 的新生儿重症监护病房平均每天提供 4-8 小时的 KMC。有 KMC 跟踪计划的新生儿重症监护室比例明显较低(28.9%)。结论这项研究强调,有必要加强对医护人员正在进行的 KMC 培训计划,以提高对低体重儿和患病早产新生儿的 KMC 覆盖率。这包括要求在全国范围内采用更加统一和结构化的新生儿监护方法,尤其是扩大基础设施的规模、更早开始新生儿监护并延长监护时间、更好地监测新生儿的监护情况以及加强随访计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Post-operative Ultrashort Bowel Syndrome in a Term Neonate: One-year Follow-up Silent Struggles Beyond Breath: Decoding Hemostatic Dynamics and Bleeding in Neonates Affected by Perinatal Asphyxia Breast Milk Output and Factors Influencing Sustained Feeding with Mother’s Own Milk in Very Preterm Births: A Prospective Observational Study Assessment of Central Catheter Tip Position in Neonates by Ultrasonography Versus X-ray Kangaroo Mother Care Foundation, India: Champion Organization Focusing on the Essentials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1