Comparison of Cytological Adequacy between 23- and 25-Gauge in Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1159/000538290
F. Puga, Inês Poças Ferreira, José Ricardo Brandão, Liliana Fonseca, André Couto de Carvalho, Cláudia Freitas
{"title":"Comparison of Cytological Adequacy between 23- and 25-Gauge in Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Prospective Study.","authors":"F. Puga, Inês Poças Ferreira, José Ricardo Brandão, Liliana Fonseca, André Couto de Carvalho, Cláudia Freitas","doi":"10.1159/000538290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nApproximately 15% of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules are considered nondiagnostic. Several factors are potentially involved, including clinical and nodule features but also the gauge (G) of the needle used. However, few studies have compared the cytological adequacy obtained with different gauge needles and the data are controversial. We aimed to evaluate cytological adequacy results using 23- or 25-G needles.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study is an observational and prospective study of thyroid nodules submitted to ultrasound-guided FNA. The procedure was performed randomly using 23- or 25-G needles. The samples were reported by different cytopathologists who were blinded to the information of the gauge of the needle used. Statistical analysis was performed to compare cytological adequacy of FNA between the two groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 177 thyroid nodules were included - 98 (55.4%) using 23-G and 79 (44.6%) using 25-G needles. The 23-G group presented a higher rate of cytological adequacy (69.4% [68/98] vs. 46.8% [37/79], p = 0.002). No differences were found between the two groups regarding patient or nodule characteristics. On logistic regression, 23-G needles correlated with better cytological adequacy (unadjusted OR 2.57 [95% CI: 1.39-4.77]), even after adjusting for nodule dimension, location, and type of cytology (slides +/- additional liquid-based cytology) (adjusted OR 2.44 [95% CI: 1.23-4.84]).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe gauge of the needle used was found to be an independent predictor of cytological adequacy, with 23-G needles providing more adequate samples. Further investigation is needed to confirm our results in order to stablish the optimal diagnosis technique.","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Approximately 15% of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules are considered nondiagnostic. Several factors are potentially involved, including clinical and nodule features but also the gauge (G) of the needle used. However, few studies have compared the cytological adequacy obtained with different gauge needles and the data are controversial. We aimed to evaluate cytological adequacy results using 23- or 25-G needles. METHODS This study is an observational and prospective study of thyroid nodules submitted to ultrasound-guided FNA. The procedure was performed randomly using 23- or 25-G needles. The samples were reported by different cytopathologists who were blinded to the information of the gauge of the needle used. Statistical analysis was performed to compare cytological adequacy of FNA between the two groups. RESULTS A total of 177 thyroid nodules were included - 98 (55.4%) using 23-G and 79 (44.6%) using 25-G needles. The 23-G group presented a higher rate of cytological adequacy (69.4% [68/98] vs. 46.8% [37/79], p = 0.002). No differences were found between the two groups regarding patient or nodule characteristics. On logistic regression, 23-G needles correlated with better cytological adequacy (unadjusted OR 2.57 [95% CI: 1.39-4.77]), even after adjusting for nodule dimension, location, and type of cytology (slides +/- additional liquid-based cytology) (adjusted OR 2.44 [95% CI: 1.23-4.84]). CONCLUSION The gauge of the needle used was found to be an independent predictor of cytological adequacy, with 23-G needles providing more adequate samples. Further investigation is needed to confirm our results in order to stablish the optimal diagnosis technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下甲状腺结节细针抽吸术中 23 号针头和 25 号针头细胞学适切性的比较:单中心前瞻性研究
简介:甲状腺结节的细针穿刺术(FNA)中约有 15% 被认为是无诊断意义的。这可能与多种因素有关,包括临床和结节特征以及所用针头的规格(G)。然而,很少有研究对使用不同规格针头所获得的细胞学充分性进行比较,数据也存在争议。本研究是一项观察性和前瞻性研究,对象是接受超声引导 FNA 的甲状腺结节。手术使用 23-G 或 25-G 针随机进行。样本由不同的细胞病理学家报告,这些病理学家对所用针头的规格信息是盲法。结果共纳入 177 个甲状腺结节,其中 98 个(55.4%)使用 23-G 针,79 个(44.6%)使用 25-G 针。23-G 组的细胞学充分率更高(69.4% [68/98] vs. 46.8% [37/79],p = 0.002)。两组患者或结节的特征没有差异。在逻辑回归中,23-G针与更好的细胞学充分性相关(未调整OR 2.57 [95% CI:1.39-4.77]),即使在调整了结节尺寸、位置和细胞学类型(切片+/-额外的液基细胞学)(调整OR 2.44 [95% CI:1.23-4.84])之后也是如此。为了确定最佳的诊断技术,还需要进一步的研究来证实我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Reclassification of urinary cytology according to The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology correlation with histological diagnosis. Cytopathology of a newly described salivary gland neoplasm. A case report of microsecretory adenocarcinoma presenting in the parotid gland. Does The Diagnostic Performance Of The Pathologist On The Indeterminate Categories Of The Bethesda System For Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology Vary Between Pediatric And Adult Patients? Evaluation of a Cytology-Molecular Co-Test in Liquid-Based Cytology-Processed Urine for Defining Indeterminate Categories of the Paris System. Diagnostic and Predictive Immunocytochemistry in Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1