Differences between the glans and shaft of the penis: a review.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Sexual medicine reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1093/sxmrev/qeae019
Letian Wei, Lei Zheng, Hui Jiang, T. Jiang
{"title":"Differences between the glans and shaft of the penis: a review.","authors":"Letian Wei, Lei Zheng, Hui Jiang, T. Jiang","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qeae019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe penis serves as a vital receptor in men, playing a significant role in sexual intercourse. While there are discernible disparities between the glans penis and the penile shaft, a comprehensive and detailed analysis of these distinctions is currently lacking.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThis study aimed to review the existing literature on the variances between the glans penis and the penile shaft, providing a systematic examination of their anatomical and histological dissimilarities.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOur investigation encompassed a thorough search of the published literature, including original articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports focused on the penis. We conducted a comprehensive review of the anatomical and histological dissimilarities between the glans penis and the penile shaft.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe following key differences were identified. First, regarding innervation, the glans penis and the penile shaft possess distinct neural pathways. The glans penis exhibits a 3-dimensional structure, while the penile shaft exhibits a 2-dimensional distribution. Notably, the nerves of the penile shaft extend penetrating branches into the corpus cavernosum. Furthermore, there are variations in nerve-specific antibodies between the 2 regions. Second, regarding composition, the glans penis and the penile shaft consist of dissimilar cavernous bodies. The glans penis contains unique epithelial structures and receptors, setting it apart from the penile shaft. Third, regarding the veins, there are disparities in the venous systems of the glans penis and the penile shaft. Fourth, regarding biothesiometry, variances in biothesiometry research have been observed between the 2 regions.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThere are differences between the glans and the shaft. To further advance our understanding, future research should delve deeper into the discrepancies between the glans penis and the penile shaft. Additionally, a more specialized subdivision of the glans penis and the penile shaft would facilitate more precise and tailored treatments.","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":"337 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The penis serves as a vital receptor in men, playing a significant role in sexual intercourse. While there are discernible disparities between the glans penis and the penile shaft, a comprehensive and detailed analysis of these distinctions is currently lacking. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to review the existing literature on the variances between the glans penis and the penile shaft, providing a systematic examination of their anatomical and histological dissimilarities. METHODS Our investigation encompassed a thorough search of the published literature, including original articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports focused on the penis. We conducted a comprehensive review of the anatomical and histological dissimilarities between the glans penis and the penile shaft. RESULTS The following key differences were identified. First, regarding innervation, the glans penis and the penile shaft possess distinct neural pathways. The glans penis exhibits a 3-dimensional structure, while the penile shaft exhibits a 2-dimensional distribution. Notably, the nerves of the penile shaft extend penetrating branches into the corpus cavernosum. Furthermore, there are variations in nerve-specific antibodies between the 2 regions. Second, regarding composition, the glans penis and the penile shaft consist of dissimilar cavernous bodies. The glans penis contains unique epithelial structures and receptors, setting it apart from the penile shaft. Third, regarding the veins, there are disparities in the venous systems of the glans penis and the penile shaft. Fourth, regarding biothesiometry, variances in biothesiometry research have been observed between the 2 regions. CONCLUSION There are differences between the glans and the shaft. To further advance our understanding, future research should delve deeper into the discrepancies between the glans penis and the penile shaft. Additionally, a more specialized subdivision of the glans penis and the penile shaft would facilitate more precise and tailored treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴茎龟头和阴茎轴的差异:综述。
引言阴茎是男性的重要感受器,在性交中起着重要作用。虽然龟头阴茎和阴茎轴之间存在明显的差异,但目前还缺乏对这些差异的全面而详细的分析。本研究旨在回顾有关龟头阴茎和阴茎轴之间差异的现有文献,对它们在解剖学和组织学上的不同之处进行系统的检查。我们对龟头阴茎和阴茎轴在解剖学和组织学上的相似性进行了全面审查。结果发现了以下主要差异。首先,在神经支配方面,龟头阴茎和阴茎轴拥有不同的神经通路。龟头阴茎呈三维结构,而阴茎轴呈二维分布。值得注意的是,阴茎轴的神经分支延伸至阴茎海绵体。此外,这两个区域的神经特异性抗体也存在差异。其次,在组成方面,龟头阴茎和阴茎轴由不同的海绵体组成。龟头阴茎包含独特的上皮结构和感受器,这使其与阴茎轴不同。第三,在静脉方面,龟头阴茎和阴茎轴的静脉系统存在差异。第四,在生物流变学方面,两个区域的生物流变学研究存在差异。为了进一步提高我们的认识,未来的研究应该深入探讨龟头和阴茎轴之间的差异。此外,对龟头阴茎和阴茎轴进行更专业的细分将有助于更精确、更有针对性的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Physical therapy approach and non-invasive modalities in treatment of vaginal laxity: a literature review. A review of the safety and efficacy of inflatable penile prosthesis ectopic reservoir placement. A systematic review on the prevalence of a silent female disorder in Arabic-speaking countries and the Middle East: sexual dysfunctions and the role of culture. A comprehensive summary of eponymous awards and scholarships in sexual medicine. Exploring the link between comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) and erectile dysfunction: implications for male sexual health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1