Hong-Yan Wang, Jian‐Bo Zhou, S. A. Wilde, Gong-Yu Li, Bin Fu
{"title":"Mesozoic intra-arc basin records the tectonic transition from the Paleo-Asian Ocean to the Paleo-Pacific Ocean in northeastern Eurasia","authors":"Hong-Yan Wang, Jian‐Bo Zhou, S. A. Wilde, Gong-Yu Li, Bin Fu","doi":"10.1130/b37244.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Paleozoic, the tectonic evolution of northeastern Eurasia has been dominated by the Paleo-Asian Ocean and the Paleo-Pacific Ocean tectonic domains. However, the spatiotemporal framework and the timing of tectonic transition between these two oceanic domains remain enigmatic. To address this issue, we report petrological, geochronological, and geochemical data for eight sandstone samples deposited along the convergent margin between the Northeast China terranes and the North China craton in central Jilin Province, China. The results show that these sandstones are immature graywackes with a maximum depositional age of Early Triassic (248 ± 1 Ma), and their sediments were largely derived from coeval magmatic rocks in a juvenile continental arc. According to our new results and previous studies, we identified a sedimentary basin (most likely an intra-arc or forearc basin) intimately associated with one or more continental arcs along the northeastern edge of the North China craton, and we suggest that the southwestward subduction of the Jilin-Heilongjiang Ocean in the early Mesozoic accounts for this continental arc setting. There is a distinct temporal gap between the closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean (ca. 260 Ma) and the onset of Paleo-Pacific plate subduction (234−220 Ma), which is essentially coeval with the southwestward subduction of the Jilin-Heilongjiang Ocean between 256 Ma and 239 Ma, meaning the latter is a key link that marks the transition between these two tectonic domains.","PeriodicalId":508784,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/b37244.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since the Paleozoic, the tectonic evolution of northeastern Eurasia has been dominated by the Paleo-Asian Ocean and the Paleo-Pacific Ocean tectonic domains. However, the spatiotemporal framework and the timing of tectonic transition between these two oceanic domains remain enigmatic. To address this issue, we report petrological, geochronological, and geochemical data for eight sandstone samples deposited along the convergent margin between the Northeast China terranes and the North China craton in central Jilin Province, China. The results show that these sandstones are immature graywackes with a maximum depositional age of Early Triassic (248 ± 1 Ma), and their sediments were largely derived from coeval magmatic rocks in a juvenile continental arc. According to our new results and previous studies, we identified a sedimentary basin (most likely an intra-arc or forearc basin) intimately associated with one or more continental arcs along the northeastern edge of the North China craton, and we suggest that the southwestward subduction of the Jilin-Heilongjiang Ocean in the early Mesozoic accounts for this continental arc setting. There is a distinct temporal gap between the closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean (ca. 260 Ma) and the onset of Paleo-Pacific plate subduction (234−220 Ma), which is essentially coeval with the southwestward subduction of the Jilin-Heilongjiang Ocean between 256 Ma and 239 Ma, meaning the latter is a key link that marks the transition between these two tectonic domains.
自古生代以来,欧亚大陆东北部的构造演化一直由古生代亚洲洋构造域和古生代太平洋构造域主导。然而,这两个大洋构造域之间的时空框架和构造转换时间仍然是个谜。为了解决这个问题,我们报告了中国吉林省中部沿中国东北陆相与华北克拉通交汇边缘沉积的八个砂岩样本的岩石学、地质年代学和地球化学数据。结果表明,这些砂岩属于未成熟灰岩,最大沉积年龄为早三叠世(248±1Ma),其沉积物主要来源于幼年大陆弧中的共生岩浆岩。根据新的研究结果和以往的研究,我们在华北克拉通东北边缘发现了一个与一个或多个大陆弧密切相关的沉积盆地(很可能是弧内盆地或弧前盆地),并认为中生代早期吉林-黑龙江洋的西南俯冲是造成这种大陆弧环境的原因。古亚洲洋的关闭(约 260 Ma)与古太平洋板块俯冲的开始(234-220 Ma)之间存在明显的时间差,这与吉林-黑龙江洋在 256 Ma 至 239 Ma 之间的西南向俯冲基本上是共时的,这意味着后者是标志这两个构造域之间过渡的关键环节。