TOD effects on travel behavior: A synthesis of evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Transport and Land Use Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.5198/jtlu.2024.2417
Bin Chi, Jinwoo Lee
{"title":"TOD effects on travel behavior: A synthesis of evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies","authors":"Bin Chi, Jinwoo Lee","doi":"10.5198/jtlu.2024.2417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impacts of transit-oriented development (TOD) on travel behavior have been extensively studied, with a predominant focus on cross-sectional analyses that provide a static evaluation at a specific point in time by comparing TODs and non-TODs. Longitudinal assessments that capture changes in behavior over time remain relatively uncommon, and the literature tends to overlook differences in evaluating TOD effects across cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Additionally, the role of trip purpose as a significant but unexplored variable influencing the degree of TOD effects is often disregarded. To address these gaps, this systematic review examines 48 quantitative studies, comparing the effects of TOD on travel behavior from cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives, restructuring indicators of effects into transit use, non-motorized travel, vehicle dependence, and vehicle ownership, and differentiating the effects by trip purpose. A metric has been introduced to quantitatively assess the impact of TOD on travel behavior. The pooled results indicate that private vehicle usage remains high in TOD areas, particularly for non-commuting trips, and that the longitudinal effects of TOD are limited and potentially influenced by individual travel attitudes, residential self-selection, and long-term travel habit change. Furthermore, the methodological differences between cross-sectional and longitudinal studies may lead to divergent conclusions regarding the effects of TOD on travel behavior. Our analysis sheds light on the importance of carefully selecting an appropriate method for a given research question to maximize the accuracy and relevance of the findings. Combining TOD and shared mobility can create a more efficient multi-model transport network that meets the diverse needs of city residents and improves accessibility for all. Overall, this review provides new insights into the impacts of TOD on travel behavior and supports the potential for a paradigm shift toward multimodal transport through the integration of TOD and shared mobility.","PeriodicalId":47271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impacts of transit-oriented development (TOD) on travel behavior have been extensively studied, with a predominant focus on cross-sectional analyses that provide a static evaluation at a specific point in time by comparing TODs and non-TODs. Longitudinal assessments that capture changes in behavior over time remain relatively uncommon, and the literature tends to overlook differences in evaluating TOD effects across cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Additionally, the role of trip purpose as a significant but unexplored variable influencing the degree of TOD effects is often disregarded. To address these gaps, this systematic review examines 48 quantitative studies, comparing the effects of TOD on travel behavior from cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives, restructuring indicators of effects into transit use, non-motorized travel, vehicle dependence, and vehicle ownership, and differentiating the effects by trip purpose. A metric has been introduced to quantitatively assess the impact of TOD on travel behavior. The pooled results indicate that private vehicle usage remains high in TOD areas, particularly for non-commuting trips, and that the longitudinal effects of TOD are limited and potentially influenced by individual travel attitudes, residential self-selection, and long-term travel habit change. Furthermore, the methodological differences between cross-sectional and longitudinal studies may lead to divergent conclusions regarding the effects of TOD on travel behavior. Our analysis sheds light on the importance of carefully selecting an appropriate method for a given research question to maximize the accuracy and relevance of the findings. Combining TOD and shared mobility can create a more efficient multi-model transport network that meets the diverse needs of city residents and improves accessibility for all. Overall, this review provides new insights into the impacts of TOD on travel behavior and supports the potential for a paradigm shift toward multimodal transport through the integration of TOD and shared mobility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TOD 对出行行为的影响:横断面和纵向研究证据综述
以公交为导向的开发(TOD)对出行行为的影响已得到广泛研究,主要集中在横断面分析上,通过比较 TOD 和非 TOD,提供特定时间点的静态评估。捕捉行为随时间变化的纵向评估仍相对少见,而且文献往往忽略了横截面分析和纵向分析在评估 TOD 效果方面的差异。此外,作为影响 TOD 效应程度的一个重要变量,出行目的的作用往往被忽视,但这一问题尚未得到探讨。为了弥补这些不足,本系统性综述审查了 48 项定量研究,从横截面和纵向角度比较了 TOD 对出行行为的影响,将影响指标重组为公交使用、非机动化出行、车辆依赖性和车辆拥有量,并按出行目的区分影响。此外,还引入了一个指标来量化评估 TOD 对出行行为的影响。汇总结果表明,在 TOD 地区,私家车的使用率仍然很高,尤其是非通勤出行,而且 TOD 的纵向影响有限,可能受到个人出行态度、居住地自我选择和长期出行习惯改变的影响。此外,横断面研究和纵向研究在方法上的差异可能会导致关于 TOD 对出行行为影响的不同结论。我们的分析揭示了针对特定研究问题谨慎选择适当方法的重要性,从而最大限度地提高研究结果的准确性和相关性。将 TOD 与共享交通结合起来,可以创建一个更高效的多模式交通网络,满足城市居民的不同需求,并改善所有人的交通可达性。总之,本综述就 TOD 对出行行为的影响提供了新的见解,并支持通过整合 TOD 和共享交通向多式联运模式转变的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transport and Land Usepublishes original interdisciplinary papers on the interaction of transport and land use. Domains include: engineering, planning, modeling, behavior, economics, geography, regional science, sociology, architecture and design, network science, and complex systems. Papers reporting innovative methodologies, original data, and new empirical findings are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Exploring factors affecting route choice of cyclists: A novel varying-contiguity spatially lagged exogenous modeling approach A framework to include socio-demographic characteristics in potential job accessibility levels in low-car and car-free development areas in the Netherlands Effect of multiscale metro network-wide attributes on peak-hour station passenger and flow balancing Effects of the built environment on travel distance in bus-oriented, medium-sized cities in China Exploring the prospects and challenges of sustainable urban mobility: Potential and limits of cycling in Venice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1