Field Triage Tools in Mass Casualty Incidents: A Narrative Review

Fahad Mohamed Aldossari, Hussain Saleh Al Bensaad
{"title":"Field Triage Tools in Mass Casualty Incidents: A Narrative Review","authors":"Fahad Mohamed Aldossari, Hussain Saleh Al Bensaad","doi":"10.9734/ajmah/2024/v22i61017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) pose significant challenges to healthcare systems, requiring rapid and effective triage strategies to optimize patient outcomes and resource utilization. This narrative review explores the evolution, effectiveness, ethical considerations, global perspectives, and future directions of field triage tools in MCIs. Beginning with the historical perspective, milestones in triage development, such as the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) protocol and its adaptations like Jump START and Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Interventions, Treat/Transport (SALT), are discussed. Current field triage systems are evaluated, including their application, limitations, and impact on patient outcomes. Training and education programs, challenges in triage education, and ethical/legal considerations in resource allocation and informed consent are examined. Global variations in triage systems, cultural factors, collaboration efforts, and standardization initiatives are explored to understand regional differences and promote interoperability. Future directions emphasize enhancing triage accuracy, integrating triage with healthcare systems, and research priorities. The review concludes with implications for practice and policy, calling for continued research, collaboration, and innovation to advance field triage capabilities and improve emergency response worldwide.","PeriodicalId":505327,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medicine and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajmah/2024/v22i61017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) pose significant challenges to healthcare systems, requiring rapid and effective triage strategies to optimize patient outcomes and resource utilization. This narrative review explores the evolution, effectiveness, ethical considerations, global perspectives, and future directions of field triage tools in MCIs. Beginning with the historical perspective, milestones in triage development, such as the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) protocol and its adaptations like Jump START and Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Interventions, Treat/Transport (SALT), are discussed. Current field triage systems are evaluated, including their application, limitations, and impact on patient outcomes. Training and education programs, challenges in triage education, and ethical/legal considerations in resource allocation and informed consent are examined. Global variations in triage systems, cultural factors, collaboration efforts, and standardization initiatives are explored to understand regional differences and promote interoperability. Future directions emphasize enhancing triage accuracy, integrating triage with healthcare systems, and research priorities. The review concludes with implications for practice and policy, calling for continued research, collaboration, and innovation to advance field triage capabilities and improve emergency response worldwide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模伤亡事件中的现场分诊工具:叙事回顾
大规模伤亡事件(MCIs)给医疗保健系统带来了巨大挑战,需要快速有效的分流策略来优化患者治疗效果和资源利用率。这篇叙述性综述探讨了 MCI 中现场分诊工具的演变、有效性、伦理考虑、全球视角和未来方向。文章从历史角度入手,讨论了分诊发展的里程碑,如简单分诊和快速治疗(START)方案及其改编方案,如跳跃式分诊(Jump START)和分类、评估、救生干预、治疗/转运(SALT)。对当前的现场分流系统进行了评估,包括其应用、局限性以及对患者治疗效果的影响。研究了培训和教育计划、分诊教育面临的挑战以及资源分配和知情同意方面的伦理/法律考虑因素。探讨了分诊系统的全球差异、文化因素、合作努力和标准化倡议,以了解地区差异并促进互操作性。未来发展方向强调提高分诊准确性、将分诊与医疗保健系统和研究重点相结合。综述最后提出了对实践和政策的影响,呼吁继续开展研究、合作和创新,以提高现场分诊能力,改善全球范围内的应急响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phytochemical Screening, In vitro Antioxidant Capacity and Nephro-protective Effects of Combined Extract of Psidium guajava and Carica papaya Leaves in Rats Intoxicated with Cadmium Comparative Assessment of Histopathological and Biochemical Indices of Renal Function in Alloxan-induced Male and Female Diabetic Rats Narrative Review on Complicated Cholecystitis: An Update on Management Central Hypopituitarism with Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency after Postpartum Hemorrhage in a 41 Years Old Female Patient Development of Digital Surveillance for the COVID-19 and Dengue Co-Epidemic (SMART-CODEN) in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1