Exploring the Relationship between Ultrasonographic Measures of the Quadriceps and Knee Extensor Muscle Fitness in Endurance-Trained Individuals

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1155/2024/3415740
Caleb C. Voskuil, Monique D. Dudar, Joshua C. Carr
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship between Ultrasonographic Measures of the Quadriceps and Knee Extensor Muscle Fitness in Endurance-Trained Individuals","authors":"Caleb C. Voskuil, Monique D. Dudar, Joshua C. Carr","doi":"10.1155/2024/3415740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background B-mode ultrasonography is an accessible and cost-effective method to assess muscle size and quality through muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI), respectively. Muscle thickness and EI have demonstrated relationships with maximal strength and local muscle endurance, providing a noninvasive and efficient modality to examine muscle fitness. However, these relationships have not been quantified in the individual quadriceps muscles of habitually endurance-trained populations, which may provide information to practitioners regarding rehabilitation and performance. Methods Twenty-three participants (males: N = 10; females: N = 13) underwent B-mode ultrasonography to assess MT, EI, and adipose tissue thickness-corrected echo intensity (cEI) in the vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), and rectus femoris (RF). Muscle fitness was evaluated through maximal strength (1RM) and local muscle endurance (4 sets to failure at 50% 1RM) during dynamic knee extension. Relationships between ultrasonography outcomes and muscle fitness were examined through stepwise multiple linear regression. Results The results indicate that VI cEI is the strongest predictor of 1RM strength (r = −0.643), while no ultrasonography-derived measures significantly predicted local muscle endurance. Conclusion The study demonstrates that ultrasonography, specifically measures of cEI in the VI, has the greatest association with maximal strength in endurance-trained individuals. These findings suggest monitoring VI muscle size and quality may benefit practitioners who aim to improve knee extension strength for performance or following injury. In addition, the findings support the use of EI examinations in trained populations.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3415740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background B-mode ultrasonography is an accessible and cost-effective method to assess muscle size and quality through muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI), respectively. Muscle thickness and EI have demonstrated relationships with maximal strength and local muscle endurance, providing a noninvasive and efficient modality to examine muscle fitness. However, these relationships have not been quantified in the individual quadriceps muscles of habitually endurance-trained populations, which may provide information to practitioners regarding rehabilitation and performance. Methods Twenty-three participants (males: N = 10; females: N = 13) underwent B-mode ultrasonography to assess MT, EI, and adipose tissue thickness-corrected echo intensity (cEI) in the vastus intermedius (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), and rectus femoris (RF). Muscle fitness was evaluated through maximal strength (1RM) and local muscle endurance (4 sets to failure at 50% 1RM) during dynamic knee extension. Relationships between ultrasonography outcomes and muscle fitness were examined through stepwise multiple linear regression. Results The results indicate that VI cEI is the strongest predictor of 1RM strength (r = −0.643), while no ultrasonography-derived measures significantly predicted local muscle endurance. Conclusion The study demonstrates that ultrasonography, specifically measures of cEI in the VI, has the greatest association with maximal strength in endurance-trained individuals. These findings suggest monitoring VI muscle size and quality may benefit practitioners who aim to improve knee extension strength for performance or following injury. In addition, the findings support the use of EI examinations in trained populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究耐力训练者股四头肌超声波测量值与膝关节伸肌力量之间的关系
背景 B 型超声波检查是通过肌肉厚度(MT)和回声强度(EI)分别评估肌肉大小和质量的一种简便、经济的方法。肌肉厚度和 EI 已证明与最大力量和局部肌肉耐力有关,为检查肌肉健康提供了一种无创、高效的方法。然而,这些关系尚未在习惯性耐力训练人群的个别股四头肌中得到量化,这可能会为从业人员提供有关康复和表现的信息。方法 23 名参与者(男性:10 人;女性:13 人)接受了 B 型超声波检查,以评估中股阔肌(VI)、外股阔肌(VL)和股直肌(RF)的 MT、EI 和脂肪组织厚度校正回波强度(cEI)。在膝关节动态伸展过程中,通过最大力量(1RM)和局部肌肉耐力(4 组,每组 50%1RM)评估肌肉健康状况。通过逐步多元线性回归研究了超声波检查结果与肌肉健康状况之间的关系。结果 结果表明,VI cEI 是预测 1RM 力量的最强指标(r = -0.643),而超声波成像衍生指标均不能显著预测局部肌肉耐力。结论 该研究表明,超声波检查,特别是测量 VI 的 cEI,与耐力训练者的最大力量关系最大。这些研究结果表明,监测 VI 肌肉的大小和质量可能会对旨在提高膝关节伸展力量以提高成绩或伤后恢复的从业人员有所帮助。此外,研究结果还支持在训练人群中使用EI检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Anatomical Cross-Sectional Area of Psoas Major Muscle Using an Ultrasound Imaging System Combined With an Inertial Measurement Unit: Improved Reliability in the US Using IMU-Based Positioning Techniques. Effect of 1-Week Weight Loss While Maintaining Total Body Water on Jump Performance. Lower Extremity Asymmetry Values Derived From Multiple Strength Testing Modes Are Associated With Perceived Functional Capabilities Among University Athletes. Athlete Monitoring Systems in Elite Men's Basketball: Challenges, Recommendations, and Future Perspectives. An Injury Prevention Programme in Physical Education Teacher Education Students: Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1