Applying artificial intelligence to predict the outcome of orthodontic treatment

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE APOS Trends in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.25259/apos_270_2023
Niranjana Ramasubbu, Shakeel Ahmed Valai Kasim, R. Thavarajah, K. Rengarajan
{"title":"Applying artificial intelligence to predict the outcome of orthodontic treatment","authors":"Niranjana Ramasubbu, Shakeel Ahmed Valai Kasim, R. Thavarajah, K. Rengarajan","doi":"10.25259/apos_270_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe study aimed to train an algorithm to predict facial and dental outcomes following orthodontic treatment using artificial intelligence (AI). In addition, the accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated by four distinct groups of evaluators.\n\n\n\nThe algorithm was trained using pre-treatment and post-treatment frontal smiling and intraoral photographs of 50 bimaxillary patients who underwent all first bicuspid extraction and orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. A questionnaire was created through Google form and it included 10 actual post-treatment and AI-predicted post-treatment images. The accuracy and acceptability of the AI-predicted outcomes were analyzed by four groups of 140 evaluators (35 orthodontists, 35 oral maxillofacial surgeons, 35 other specialty dentists, and 35 laypersons).\n\n\n\nThe Style-based Generative Adversarial Network-2 algorithm used in this study proved effective in predicting post-treatment outcomes using pre-treatment frontal facial photographs of bimaxillary patients who underwent extraction of all first bicuspids as part of their treatment regimen. The responses from the four different groups of evaluators varied. Laypersons exhibited greater acceptance of the AI-predicted images, whereas oral maxillofacial surgeons showed the least agreement. The base of the nose and the chin demonstrated the most accurate predictions, while gingival visibility and the upper lip-to-teeth relationship exhibited the least prediction accuracy.\n\n\n\nThe outcomes underscore the potential of the method, with a majority of evaluators finding predictions made by the AI algorithm to be generally reliable. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to address constraints such as image tonicity and the proportional accuracy of the predicted images.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_270_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to train an algorithm to predict facial and dental outcomes following orthodontic treatment using artificial intelligence (AI). In addition, the accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated by four distinct groups of evaluators. The algorithm was trained using pre-treatment and post-treatment frontal smiling and intraoral photographs of 50 bimaxillary patients who underwent all first bicuspid extraction and orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. A questionnaire was created through Google form and it included 10 actual post-treatment and AI-predicted post-treatment images. The accuracy and acceptability of the AI-predicted outcomes were analyzed by four groups of 140 evaluators (35 orthodontists, 35 oral maxillofacial surgeons, 35 other specialty dentists, and 35 laypersons). The Style-based Generative Adversarial Network-2 algorithm used in this study proved effective in predicting post-treatment outcomes using pre-treatment frontal facial photographs of bimaxillary patients who underwent extraction of all first bicuspids as part of their treatment regimen. The responses from the four different groups of evaluators varied. Laypersons exhibited greater acceptance of the AI-predicted images, whereas oral maxillofacial surgeons showed the least agreement. The base of the nose and the chin demonstrated the most accurate predictions, while gingival visibility and the upper lip-to-teeth relationship exhibited the least prediction accuracy. The outcomes underscore the potential of the method, with a majority of evaluators finding predictions made by the AI algorithm to be generally reliable. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to address constraints such as image tonicity and the proportional accuracy of the predicted images.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用人工智能预测正畸治疗的结果
该研究旨在利用人工智能(AI)训练一种预测正畸治疗后面部和牙齿效果的算法。该算法使用了 50 名双颌患者治疗前和治疗后的正面微笑照片和口内照片进行训练,这些患者均接受了首次双尖牙拔除术和使用固定矫治器的正畸治疗。通过谷歌表格制作了一份调查问卷,其中包括 10 张实际治疗后图像和人工智能预测的治疗后图像。这项研究中使用的基于风格的生成对抗网络-2 算法被证明可以有效地预测治疗后的结果,该算法使用的是双颌患者治疗前的正面面部照片,这些患者在治疗过程中进行了所有第一尖牙的拔除。四组不同评估者的反应各不相同。普通人对人工智能预测图像的接受度更高,而口腔颌面外科医生对人工智能预测图像的接受度最低。鼻底和下巴的预测最为准确,而牙龈能见度和上唇与牙齿的关系的预测准确性最低。尽管如此,还需要进一步的研究来解决图像强直性和预测图像比例准确性等限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Comparison of coating stability and surface characterization of different esthetic NiTi arch wires – An in vivo study Accelerated and hybrid orthodontic treatment using a combination of 2D lingual appliance and in-house aligner: An anterior cross-bite and TMD case report after 1-year follow-up The perception of facial esthetics with regard to different buccal corridors and facial proportions Clinical effect of low-level laser therapy on pain perception after placement of initial orthodontic archwires Orthodontic treatment of a patient with pycnodysostosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1