From applied ethics and ethical principles to virtue and narrative in AI practices

Paul Hayes, Noel Fitzpatrick, José Manuel Ferrández
{"title":"From applied ethics and ethical principles to virtue and narrative in AI practices","authors":"Paul Hayes,&nbsp;Noel Fitzpatrick,&nbsp;José Manuel Ferrández","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00472-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The question of how we can use ethics and ethical frameworks to avert the negative consequences of AI through guidance on human behaviour and the design of technological systems has recently been receiving increasing attention. The appropriate response to an ethics of AI has certainly been contentious. For some years the wisdom of deontology and utilitarianism in the ethics of technology has been questioned. Today, a kind of AI ethics principlism has gained a degree of widespread acceptance, yet it still invites harsh rejections in recent scholarship. In this paper, we wish to explore the contribution to an ethics of AI made by a narrative philosophy and ethics of technology inspired by the ‘little ethics’ of Paul Ricoeur, and virtue ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre, most recently and promisingly built upon by Wessel Reijers and Mark Coeckelbergh. The objective of this paper is to examine the extent to which a narrative and virtue based ethics (or, VPD, i.e., virtuous practice design) might be a plausible candidate for the foundation of an ethics of AI, or rather ethical AI practice. This will be achieved by exploring the ways in which this approach can respond to some of the significant faults with or critiques of applied and principles and guidelines based ethical approaches to AI ethics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 2","pages":"1217 - 1239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00472-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00472-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of how we can use ethics and ethical frameworks to avert the negative consequences of AI through guidance on human behaviour and the design of technological systems has recently been receiving increasing attention. The appropriate response to an ethics of AI has certainly been contentious. For some years the wisdom of deontology and utilitarianism in the ethics of technology has been questioned. Today, a kind of AI ethics principlism has gained a degree of widespread acceptance, yet it still invites harsh rejections in recent scholarship. In this paper, we wish to explore the contribution to an ethics of AI made by a narrative philosophy and ethics of technology inspired by the ‘little ethics’ of Paul Ricoeur, and virtue ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre, most recently and promisingly built upon by Wessel Reijers and Mark Coeckelbergh. The objective of this paper is to examine the extent to which a narrative and virtue based ethics (or, VPD, i.e., virtuous practice design) might be a plausible candidate for the foundation of an ethics of AI, or rather ethical AI practice. This will be achieved by exploring the ways in which this approach can respond to some of the significant faults with or critiques of applied and principles and guidelines based ethical approaches to AI ethics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从应用伦理和伦理原则到人工智能实践中的美德和叙事
我们如何利用伦理和伦理框架,通过对人类行为和技术系统设计的指导,来避免人工智能的负面后果,这个问题最近受到越来越多的关注。对人工智能伦理的适当回应无疑是有争议的。多年来,技术伦理中的义务论和功利主义的智慧受到了质疑。今天,一种人工智能伦理原则已经获得了一定程度的广泛接受,但在最近的学术研究中,它仍然遭到了严厉的拒绝。在本文中,我们希望探讨由Paul Ricoeur的“小伦理”和Alasdair MacIntyre的美德伦理启发的叙事哲学和技术伦理对人工智能伦理的贡献,最近和有希望由Wessel Reijers和Mark coeckelberg建立。本文的目的是研究基于叙事和美德的伦理(或VPD,即道德实践设计)在多大程度上可能是人工智能伦理基础的合理候选者,或者更确切地说,是道德人工智能实践。这将通过探索这种方法如何应对基于人工智能伦理的应用和原则和指导方针的伦理方法的一些重大错误或批评来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values. Against AI ethics: challenging the conventional narratives Legitimate expectations in the age of innovation Dehumanising education: AI and the capitalist capture of teaching An overview of AI ethics: moral concerns through the lens of principles, lived realities and power structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1