Effects of message frames and visual cues on cell-cultured meat communication: sensation seeking as a moderator

Namyeon Lee, Sungkyoung Lee
{"title":"Effects of message frames and visual cues on cell-cultured meat communication: sensation seeking as a moderator","authors":"Namyeon Lee, Sungkyoung Lee","doi":"10.22323/2.23030201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nCell-cultured meat presents environmental and ethical advantages; however, negative public acceptance remains a significant hurdle. To generate more effective public engagement on this topic, we conducted two online experiments exploring the impact of message framing and food cues (Experiment 1) and the moderating role of an individual's personality trait, sensation seeking, (Experiment 2) on the perception of cultured meat news shared via social media. Our findings revealed that messages employing individual benefit-framing, as opposed to societal benefit-framing, resulted in more positive perceptions of cultured meat. Incorporating direct food cues in the communication led to reduced risk perception, a more favorable attitude, and increased intention to purchase cultured meat. Furthermore, sensation seeking was shown to be a significant moderator for the effects of the message features. Theoretical and practical contributions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":501088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Communication","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23030201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cell-cultured meat presents environmental and ethical advantages; however, negative public acceptance remains a significant hurdle. To generate more effective public engagement on this topic, we conducted two online experiments exploring the impact of message framing and food cues (Experiment 1) and the moderating role of an individual's personality trait, sensation seeking, (Experiment 2) on the perception of cultured meat news shared via social media. Our findings revealed that messages employing individual benefit-framing, as opposed to societal benefit-framing, resulted in more positive perceptions of cultured meat. Incorporating direct food cues in the communication led to reduced risk perception, a more favorable attitude, and increased intention to purchase cultured meat. Furthermore, sensation seeking was shown to be a significant moderator for the effects of the message features. Theoretical and practical contributions are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息框架和视觉线索对细胞培养肉类交流的影响:寻求感觉是调节因素
细胞培养肉具有环保和道德方面的优势,但公众的负面接受程度仍然是一个重大障碍。为了让公众更有效地参与到这一话题中来,我们进行了两次在线实验,探索信息框架和食物线索(实验 1)以及个人的人格特质--寻求感觉(实验 2)--对通过社交媒体分享的培养肉新闻的感知的影响。我们的研究结果表明,与社会利益框架相比,采用个人利益框架的信息会使人们对养殖肉类产生更积极的看法。在传播中纳入直接的食物线索会降低风险感知,使人们对其持更有利的态度,并增加购买养殖肉类的意愿。此外,研究还表明,寻求感官刺激是影响信息特征的一个重要调节因素。本文讨论了理论和实践方面的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Citizen science and science communication: toward a more inclusive pattern? #AISCICOMM24. Discussing the role of (generative) AI for science communication research and science communication practice International Symposium on Public Communication of Science and Technology in Zacatecas, Mexico: between diversity, inclusion and pending questions Science journalism in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: news sources engagement and [lack of] science accountability Exploring the behavioral mechanisms of Chinese scientists' public engagement with science based on an integrative model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1