Prevalence and determinants of burnout among South African doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY South African Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2225
Saajidah Khan, I. Ntatamala, R. Baatjies, S. Adams
{"title":"Prevalence and determinants of burnout among South African doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Saajidah Khan, I. Ntatamala, R. Baatjies, S. Adams","doi":"10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Burnout, resulting from chronic workplace stress that has been unsuccessfully managed, has previously been documented in doctors. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has increased occupational challenges faced by doctors, potentiating their risk for burnout.Aim: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of burnout among medical doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic.Setting: Three public sector hospitals in Gqeberha, South Africa.Methods: A cross-sectional study of 260 voluntary participants was conducted. Participants completed self-administered electronic questionnaires. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the determinants of burnout.Results: The prevalence of burnout in this study was 78%. Burnout was significantly associated with being a medical intern or community-service medical officer (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] = 6.72, 1.71–26.40), being in the lowest income band (AOR = 10.78, 2.55–45.49), and using alcohol to manage work-related stress (AOR = 3.01, 1.12–8.04). Job-related factors associated with burnout were experiencing high conflict at work (AOR = 5.04, 1.92–13.20) and high role ambiguity and role conflict (AOR = 4.49, 1.98–10.18). Low support at work (AOR = 9.99, 3.66–27.23), medium job satisfaction (AOR = 5.38, 2.65–10.93) and medium support at work (AOR = 3.39, 1.71–6.73) were positively associated with burnout. Participants with medium (AOR = 0.28, 0.10–0.80) and high levels of resilience (AOR = 0.08, 0.03–0.25) were protected against burnout. Coronavirus disease 2019-related factors were not significantly associated with burnout.Conclusion: The burnout prevalence among South African medical doctors at public hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic was high and strongly associated with job stress factors.Contribution: Given the increased prevalence of burnout among doctors and the strong associations with job stress factors, mitigation of burnout requires targeted organisational interventions.","PeriodicalId":51156,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout, resulting from chronic workplace stress that has been unsuccessfully managed, has previously been documented in doctors. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has increased occupational challenges faced by doctors, potentiating their risk for burnout.Aim: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of burnout among medical doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic.Setting: Three public sector hospitals in Gqeberha, South Africa.Methods: A cross-sectional study of 260 voluntary participants was conducted. Participants completed self-administered electronic questionnaires. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the determinants of burnout.Results: The prevalence of burnout in this study was 78%. Burnout was significantly associated with being a medical intern or community-service medical officer (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] = 6.72, 1.71–26.40), being in the lowest income band (AOR = 10.78, 2.55–45.49), and using alcohol to manage work-related stress (AOR = 3.01, 1.12–8.04). Job-related factors associated with burnout were experiencing high conflict at work (AOR = 5.04, 1.92–13.20) and high role ambiguity and role conflict (AOR = 4.49, 1.98–10.18). Low support at work (AOR = 9.99, 3.66–27.23), medium job satisfaction (AOR = 5.38, 2.65–10.93) and medium support at work (AOR = 3.39, 1.71–6.73) were positively associated with burnout. Participants with medium (AOR = 0.28, 0.10–0.80) and high levels of resilience (AOR = 0.08, 0.03–0.25) were protected against burnout. Coronavirus disease 2019-related factors were not significantly associated with burnout.Conclusion: The burnout prevalence among South African medical doctors at public hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic was high and strongly associated with job stress factors.Contribution: Given the increased prevalence of burnout among doctors and the strong associations with job stress factors, mitigation of burnout requires targeted organisational interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间南非医生职业倦怠的发生率和决定因素
背景:医生因长期工作压力得不到有效控制而产生职业倦怠。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行增加了医生面临的职业挑战,加剧了他们的职业倦怠风险:地点: 南非盖贝哈的三家公立医院:方法:对 260 名自愿参与者进行横断面研究。参与者填写了自填式电子问卷。对职业倦怠的决定因素进行了逻辑回归分析:结果:在这项研究中,职业倦怠的发生率为 78%。职业倦怠与实习医生或社区服务医务人员(调整后奇数比 [AOR] = 6.72,1.71-26.40)、处于最低收入段(AOR = 10.78,2.55-45.49)以及使用酒精来应对工作压力(AOR = 3.01,1.12-8.04)有明显关联。与工作倦怠相关的因素有工作冲突大(AOR = 5.04,1.92-13.20)、角色模糊和角色冲突大(AOR = 4.49,1.98-10.18)。低度工作支持(AOR = 9.99,3.66-27.23)、中度工作满意度(AOR = 5.38,2.65-10.93)和中度工作支持(AOR = 3.39,1.71-6.73)与职业倦怠呈正相关。中度(AOR = 0.28,0.10-0.80)和高度(AOR = 0.08,0.03-0.25)抗压能力的参与者可避免倦怠。2019年冠状病毒病相关因素与职业倦怠无明显关联:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,南非公立医院医生的职业倦怠发生率很高,并且与工作压力因素密切相关:鉴于医生的职业倦怠发生率增加,且与工作压力因素密切相关,减轻职业倦怠需要有针对性的组织干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is the leading psychiatric journal of Africa. It provides open-access scholarly reading for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists and all with an interest in mental health. It carries empirical and conceptual research articles, reviews, editorials, and scientific letters related to psychiatry. It publishes work from various places in the world, and makes special provision for the interests of Africa. It seeks to serve its readership and researchers with the most topical content in psychiatry for clinical practice and academic pursuits, including work in the subspecialty areas of psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
A culturally congruent approach to trauma symptoms detection in first-episode psychosis. Changes in patient-reported outcomes during admission to a South African psychiatric facility. Youth exposure to violence and victimization in a South African community sample. A call for communication, compassion and care. Lithium-induced cognitive dysfunction assessed over 1-year hospitalisation: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1