The obscure politics of artificial intelligence: a Marxian socio-technical critique of the AI alignment problem thesis

Federico Cugurullo
{"title":"The obscure politics of artificial intelligence: a Marxian socio-technical critique of the AI alignment problem thesis","authors":"Federico Cugurullo","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00476-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a growing feeling that artificial intelligence (AI) is getting out of control. Many AI experts worldwide stress that great care must be taken on the so-called <i>alignment problem</i>, broadly understood as the challenge of developing AIs whose actions are in line with human values and goals. The story goes that ever more powerful AI systems are escaping human control and might soon operate in a manner that is no longer guided by human purposes. This is what we call the <i>AI-out-of-control discourse</i> which, in this paper, we critically examine and debunk. Drawing on complementary insights from political theory, socio-technical studies and Marxian political economy, we critique the supposed animistic and autonomous nature of AI, and the myth of the uncontrollability of AI. The problem is not that humanity has lost control over AI, but that only a minority of powerful stakeholders are controlling its creation and diffusion, through politically undemocratic processes of decision-making. In these terms, we reframe the alignment problem thesis with an emphasis on citizen engagement and public political participation. We shed light on the existing politics of AI and contemplate alternative political expressions whereby citizens steer AI development or stop it in the first place.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 2","pages":"1189 - 1201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00476-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00476-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing feeling that artificial intelligence (AI) is getting out of control. Many AI experts worldwide stress that great care must be taken on the so-called alignment problem, broadly understood as the challenge of developing AIs whose actions are in line with human values and goals. The story goes that ever more powerful AI systems are escaping human control and might soon operate in a manner that is no longer guided by human purposes. This is what we call the AI-out-of-control discourse which, in this paper, we critically examine and debunk. Drawing on complementary insights from political theory, socio-technical studies and Marxian political economy, we critique the supposed animistic and autonomous nature of AI, and the myth of the uncontrollability of AI. The problem is not that humanity has lost control over AI, but that only a minority of powerful stakeholders are controlling its creation and diffusion, through politically undemocratic processes of decision-making. In these terms, we reframe the alignment problem thesis with an emphasis on citizen engagement and public political participation. We shed light on the existing politics of AI and contemplate alternative political expressions whereby citizens steer AI development or stop it in the first place.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能的模糊政治:对人工智能排列问题论的马克思社会技术批判
人们越来越感觉到人工智能(AI)正在失去控制。世界各地的许多人工智能专家都强调,必须非常谨慎地对待所谓的“一致性问题”,这被广泛理解为开发行动符合人类价值观和目标的人工智能所面临的挑战。故事是这样的:越来越强大的人工智能系统正在摆脱人类的控制,可能很快就会以一种不再受人类目的引导的方式运行。这就是我们所说的人工智能失控的话语,在本文中,我们将对其进行批判性的研究和揭穿。利用政治理论、社会技术研究和马克思主义政治经济学的互补见解,我们批判了人工智能的泛灵论和自治性质,以及人工智能不可控制的神话。问题不在于人类已经失去了对人工智能的控制,而是只有少数强大的利益相关者通过政治上不民主的决策过程控制着人工智能的创造和传播。在这些条件下,我们重新构建对齐问题的论点,强调公民参与和公众政治参与。我们阐明了人工智能的现有政治,并考虑了公民引导人工智能发展或首先阻止人工智能发展的替代政治表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Against AI ethics: challenging the conventional narratives Legitimate expectations in the age of innovation Dehumanising education: AI and the capitalist capture of teaching An overview of AI ethics: moral concerns through the lens of principles, lived realities and power structures Justification optional: ChatGPT’s advice can still influence human judgments about moral dilemmas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1