Aspirin Does Not Inhibit Platelet-Rich Plasma Releasate Efficacy in a Murine Model of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Matthew L. Magruder, Sarah Caughey, Camila Carballo, Claire D. Eliasberg, Yulei Liu, Janice Havasy, Alex Piacentini, Scott Rodeo
{"title":"Aspirin Does Not Inhibit Platelet-Rich Plasma Releasate Efficacy in a Murine Model of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy","authors":"Matthew L. Magruder, Sarah Caughey, Camila Carballo, Claire D. Eliasberg, Yulei Liu, Janice Havasy, Alex Piacentini, Scott Rodeo","doi":"10.1177/15563316241243371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to be a promising treatment for subacromial impingement, and although its interaction with aspirin (ASA) is controversial, many providers ask patients to stop non–steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use before PRP administration. This studied aimed to identify the effect of PRP in a murine model of subacromial impingement and to explore the effect of ASA on PRP treatment. A murine model of subacromial impingement was used, incorporating 48 wild-type C57BL/6 mice. After impingement surgery, mice received either human PRP activated via calcium chloride or saline injected into the subacromial space. The mice received either drinking water with ASA or standard drinking water, creating 4 groups: saline injection, saline injection + ASA, PRP injection, and PRP injection + ASA. All injections occurred at 3 weeks after impingement surgery, and mice were evaluated at 6 weeks. Each mouse underwent gait analysis, biomechanical analysis (N = 10 shoulders), histological analysis (N = 6), and gene expression analysis (N = 8). Biomechanical testing showed increased load to failure in the PRP group compared to the ASA group, and increased stiffness in PRP vs saline, PRP vs ASA, and PRP vs ASA + PRP. Gene expression analysis identified 17 downregulated genes between the ASA + PRP and saline groups. Eight of these differentially expressed genes contribute to collagen biosynthesis and modification, 4 to extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, and 4 to ECM degradation. In this preliminary analysis, PRP injections in a murine model of subacromial impingement demonstrated mixed effects on tendon quality and pain, and ASA did not have a consistent effect on the response to PRP.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241243371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to be a promising treatment for subacromial impingement, and although its interaction with aspirin (ASA) is controversial, many providers ask patients to stop non–steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use before PRP administration. This studied aimed to identify the effect of PRP in a murine model of subacromial impingement and to explore the effect of ASA on PRP treatment. A murine model of subacromial impingement was used, incorporating 48 wild-type C57BL/6 mice. After impingement surgery, mice received either human PRP activated via calcium chloride or saline injected into the subacromial space. The mice received either drinking water with ASA or standard drinking water, creating 4 groups: saline injection, saline injection + ASA, PRP injection, and PRP injection + ASA. All injections occurred at 3 weeks after impingement surgery, and mice were evaluated at 6 weeks. Each mouse underwent gait analysis, biomechanical analysis (N = 10 shoulders), histological analysis (N = 6), and gene expression analysis (N = 8). Biomechanical testing showed increased load to failure in the PRP group compared to the ASA group, and increased stiffness in PRP vs saline, PRP vs ASA, and PRP vs ASA + PRP. Gene expression analysis identified 17 downregulated genes between the ASA + PRP and saline groups. Eight of these differentially expressed genes contribute to collagen biosynthesis and modification, 4 to extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, and 4 to ECM degradation. In this preliminary analysis, PRP injections in a murine model of subacromial impingement demonstrated mixed effects on tendon quality and pain, and ASA did not have a consistent effect on the response to PRP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿司匹林不会抑制富血小板血浆释放物在小鼠肩袖肌腱病模型中的疗效
富血小板血浆(PRP)已被证明是一种治疗肩峰下撞击的有效方法,尽管其与阿司匹林(ASA)的相互作用存在争议,但许多医疗机构要求患者在使用 PRP 前停止使用非甾体抗炎药。本研究旨在确定 PRP 在小鼠肩峰下撞击模型中的效果,并探讨 ASA 对 PRP 治疗的影响。研究使用了一种小鼠肩峰下撞击模型,其中包括 48 只野生型 C57BL/6 小鼠。撞击手术后,小鼠接受通过氯化钙激活的人类 PRP 或注射到肩峰下间隙的生理盐水。小鼠接受含有 ASA 的饮用水或标准饮用水,共分为 4 组:生理盐水注射组、生理盐水注射 + ASA 组、PRP 注射组和 PRP 注射 + ASA 组。所有注射均在撞击手术后 3 周进行,小鼠在 6 周时接受评估。每只小鼠都接受了步态分析、生物力学分析(10 肩)、组织学分析(6)和基因表达分析(8)。生物力学测试表明,与 ASA 组相比,PRP 组的破坏负荷增加,PRP 与生理盐水组、PRP 与 ASA 组以及 PRP 与 ASA + PRP 组的硬度增加。基因表达分析在 ASA + PRP 组和生理盐水组之间发现了 17 个下调基因。在这些表达不同的基因中,8 个基因与胶原的生物合成和修饰有关,4 个基因与细胞外基质 (ECM) 合成有关,4 个基因与 ECM 降解有关。在这项初步分析中,在小鼠肩峰下撞击模型中注射 PRP 对肌腱质量和疼痛的影响不一,而 ASA 对 PRP 的反应没有一致的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Post operative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review The Efficacy of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Should Surgeons Be Wearing Ear Protection During Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty? Symptomatic Early Rupture of the InSpace Subacromial Balloon Spacer: A Case Report A Nationwide Comparison of Outcomes and Resource Use in Staged vs Simultaneous Cervical and Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Database Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1