Characteristics of primary care practices by proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional cohort study

J. Shuldiner, Michael E. Green, Tara Kiran, Shahriar Khan, E. Frymire, Rahim Moineddin, Meghan Kerr, Mina Tadrous, D. Nowak, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Jia Hu, Holly O. Witteman, Bryn Hamilton, Isaac Bogoch, Lydia-Joy Marshall, Sophia Ikura, Stacey Bar-Ziv, David Kaplan, Noah Ivers
{"title":"Characteristics of primary care practices by proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional cohort study","authors":"J. Shuldiner, Michael E. Green, Tara Kiran, Shahriar Khan, E. Frymire, Rahim Moineddin, Meghan Kerr, Mina Tadrous, D. Nowak, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Jia Hu, Holly O. Witteman, Bryn Hamilton, Isaac Bogoch, Lydia-Joy Marshall, Sophia Ikura, Stacey Bar-Ziv, David Kaplan, Noah Ivers","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.230816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Variations in primary care practices may explain some differences in health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to evaluate the characteristics of primary care practices by the proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional cohort study using linked administrative data sets in Ontario, Canada. We calculated the percentage of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 enrolled with each comprehensive-care family physician, ranked physicians according to the proportion of patients unvaccinated, and identified physicians in the top 10% (v. the other 90%). We compared characteristics of family physicians and their patients in these 2 groups using standardized differences. Results: We analyzed 9060 family physicians with 10 837 909 enrolled patients. Family physicians with the largest proportion (top 10%) of unvaccinated patients (n = 906) were more likely to be male, to have trained outside of Canada, to be older, and to work in an enhanced fee-for-service model than those in the remaining 90%. Vaccine coverage (≥ 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine) was 74% among patients of physicians with the largest proportion of unvaccinated patients, compared with 87% in the remaining patient population. Patients in the top 10% group tended to be younger and live in areas with higher levels of ethnic diversity and immigration and lower incomes. Interpretation: Primary care practices with the largest proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 served marginalized communities and were less likely to use team-based care models. These findings can guide resource planning and help tailor interventions to integrate public health priorities within primary care practices.","PeriodicalId":10359,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal","volume":"12 7","pages":"E432 - E440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.230816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Variations in primary care practices may explain some differences in health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to evaluate the characteristics of primary care practices by the proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional cohort study using linked administrative data sets in Ontario, Canada. We calculated the percentage of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 enrolled with each comprehensive-care family physician, ranked physicians according to the proportion of patients unvaccinated, and identified physicians in the top 10% (v. the other 90%). We compared characteristics of family physicians and their patients in these 2 groups using standardized differences. Results: We analyzed 9060 family physicians with 10 837 909 enrolled patients. Family physicians with the largest proportion (top 10%) of unvaccinated patients (n = 906) were more likely to be male, to have trained outside of Canada, to be older, and to work in an enhanced fee-for-service model than those in the remaining 90%. Vaccine coverage (≥ 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine) was 74% among patients of physicians with the largest proportion of unvaccinated patients, compared with 87% in the remaining patient population. Patients in the top 10% group tended to be younger and live in areas with higher levels of ethnic diversity and immigration and lower incomes. Interpretation: Primary care practices with the largest proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 served marginalized communities and were less likely to use team-based care models. These findings can guide resource planning and help tailor interventions to integrate public health priorities within primary care practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按未接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的患者比例划分的初级保健机构的特点:一项横断面队列研究
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,初级保健实践的差异可能解释了健康结果的某些差异。我们试图根据未接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的患者比例来评估基层医疗机构的特点。方法我们利用加拿大安大略省的关联管理数据集开展了一项基于人群的横断面队列研究。我们计算了每位综合护理家庭医生所服务的未接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的患者比例,根据未接种疫苗的患者比例对医生进行了排名,并确定了排名前 10%(与其他 90%)的医生。我们使用标准化差异比较了这两组家庭医生及其患者的特征。结果:我们分析了 9060 名家庭医生和 10 837 909 名注册患者。与其余 90% 的家庭医生相比,未接种疫苗患者比例最高(前 10%)的家庭医生(n = 906)更有可能是男性,在加拿大以外接受过培训,年龄更大,并且在强化收费服务模式下工作。在未接种疫苗患者比例最高的医生的患者中,疫苗接种率(≥ 2 剂 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗)为 74%,而在其余患者群体中,疫苗接种率为 87%。比例最高的 10%群体中的患者往往更年轻,居住在种族多样性和移民水平较高且收入较低的地区。释义未接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗的患者比例最高的初级医疗机构服务于边缘化社区,而且不太可能采用团队医疗模式。这些发现可以为资源规划提供指导,并有助于调整干预措施,将公共卫生优先事项纳入初级保健实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Avis de décès pour mai 2024 Polypes endométriaux June 2024 obituaries « Admissions pour manque de soutien social » dans les hôpitaux: un échec des politiques, et non des personnes Oral immunotherapy for treatment of food allergy in infants and preschoolers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1