Strategies of hepatitis C virus elimination for people who inject drugs receiving opioid agonist therapy in the era of direct‐acting antivirals

IF 0.3 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Advances in Digestive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-07 DOI:10.1002/aid2.13382
Fai‐Meng Sou, Chien‐Hung Chen, Pao-Yuan Huang, Ming‐Chao Tsai, Yi‐Hao Yen, Sheng-Nan Lu, Chao-Hung Hung, Yuan‐Hung Kuo
{"title":"Strategies of hepatitis C virus elimination for people who inject drugs receiving opioid agonist therapy in the era of direct‐acting antivirals","authors":"Fai‐Meng Sou, Chien‐Hung Chen, Pao-Yuan Huang, Ming‐Chao Tsai, Yi‐Hao Yen, Sheng-Nan Lu, Chao-Hung Hung, Yuan‐Hung Kuo","doi":"10.1002/aid2.13382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased uptake of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID) is critical to achieve HCV elimination goals. This study attempted to observe the influence of different referral strategies among HCV‐infected PWID for direct‐acting antivirals (DAA). From January 2019 to November 2020, approximately 190 PWID regularly received opioid agonist therapies (OAT) in the drug addiction rehabilitation clinic of our institute. Among these, those with positive anti‐HCV were further referred to our hepatology clinics for HCV viremia screening and treatment. According to physician involvement, referral strategies were divided into three models including patient self‐intention referral (SR); intensive referral (IR) where patients were referred by clinicians; and fast‐intensive referral (FIR) where patients were referred by clinicians with a fast‐screening and easy‐treatment program. A total of 121 HCV‐infected PWID were enrolled and 71 (58.7%) of them received the referrals: 16 (22.5%) in the SR model, 36 (50.7%) in the IR model, and 19 (26.8%) in the FIR model. Monthly average referred patient number was 2.7 people in the SR model, 2.8 people in the IR model, and 4.8 people in the FIR model, respectively. Among the 71 referred patients, 64 (90.1%) had detectable HCV viremia with genotype distributions being genotype 1a (G1a) in 23 patients (35.9%), G1b in 10 (15.6%), G2 in 5 (7.8%), G3 in 6 (9.4%), and G6 in 20 (31.3%). Except for three patients who refused treatment, 61 patients underwent and completed DAA treatment including 35 patients for Maviret, 15 for Epclusa, 9 for Harvoni, and 2 for Zepatier. Excluding three patients who were lost to follow‐up and one becoming reinfected, 57 (93.4%) eventually achieved a sustained virologic response. Although HCV treatment uptake among PWID in this hospital‐based setting remained suboptimal, the FIR model with a quick‐to‐screen and easy‐to‐treat program was proven practicable in the hospital setting. Further innovative strategies are required to reach all HCV‐infected PWID receiving OAT.","PeriodicalId":7278,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aid2.13382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased uptake of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID) is critical to achieve HCV elimination goals. This study attempted to observe the influence of different referral strategies among HCV‐infected PWID for direct‐acting antivirals (DAA). From January 2019 to November 2020, approximately 190 PWID regularly received opioid agonist therapies (OAT) in the drug addiction rehabilitation clinic of our institute. Among these, those with positive anti‐HCV were further referred to our hepatology clinics for HCV viremia screening and treatment. According to physician involvement, referral strategies were divided into three models including patient self‐intention referral (SR); intensive referral (IR) where patients were referred by clinicians; and fast‐intensive referral (FIR) where patients were referred by clinicians with a fast‐screening and easy‐treatment program. A total of 121 HCV‐infected PWID were enrolled and 71 (58.7%) of them received the referrals: 16 (22.5%) in the SR model, 36 (50.7%) in the IR model, and 19 (26.8%) in the FIR model. Monthly average referred patient number was 2.7 people in the SR model, 2.8 people in the IR model, and 4.8 people in the FIR model, respectively. Among the 71 referred patients, 64 (90.1%) had detectable HCV viremia with genotype distributions being genotype 1a (G1a) in 23 patients (35.9%), G1b in 10 (15.6%), G2 in 5 (7.8%), G3 in 6 (9.4%), and G6 in 20 (31.3%). Except for three patients who refused treatment, 61 patients underwent and completed DAA treatment including 35 patients for Maviret, 15 for Epclusa, 9 for Harvoni, and 2 for Zepatier. Excluding three patients who were lost to follow‐up and one becoming reinfected, 57 (93.4%) eventually achieved a sustained virologic response. Although HCV treatment uptake among PWID in this hospital‐based setting remained suboptimal, the FIR model with a quick‐to‐screen and easy‐to‐treat program was proven practicable in the hospital setting. Further innovative strategies are required to reach all HCV‐infected PWID receiving OAT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接作用抗病毒药物时代接受阿片激动剂治疗的注射吸毒者清除丙型肝炎病毒的策略
提高注射吸毒者(PWID)接受丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗的比例对于实现消除丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的目标至关重要。本研究试图观察不同转诊策略对感染丙型肝炎病毒的注射吸毒者接受直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗的影响。从2019年1月至2020年11月,约190名PWID定期在我院戒毒康复门诊接受阿片激动剂治疗(OAT)。其中,抗-HCV 阳性者被进一步转诊至我院肝病门诊进行 HCV 病毒血症筛查和治疗。根据医生的参与程度,转诊策略分为三种模式,包括患者自我转诊(SR);由临床医生转诊的强化转诊(IR);以及由临床医生转诊的快速强化转诊(FIR),即快速筛查和简易治疗方案。共有 121 名感染了 HCV 的吸毒者参加了转介,其中 71 人(58.7%)接受了转介:16 人(22.5%)接受了 SR 模式的转介,36 人(50.7%)接受了 IR 模式的转介,19 人(26.8%)接受了 FIR 模式的转介。在 SR 模式中,每月平均转介患者人数为 2.7 人;在 IR 模式中,每月平均转介患者人数为 2.8 人;在 FIR 模式中,每月平均转介患者人数为 4.8 人。在 71 名转诊患者中,64 人(90.1%)检测到了 HCV 病毒血症,基因型分布为基因型 1a (G1a)23 人(35.9%),G1b 10 人(15.6%),G2 5 人(7.8%),G3 6 人(9.4%),G6 20 人(31.3%)。除 3 名拒绝接受治疗的患者外,61 名患者接受并完成了 DAA 治疗,其中包括 35 名接受 Maviret 治疗的患者、15 名接受 Epclusa 治疗的患者、9 名接受 Harvoni 治疗的患者和 2 名接受 Zepatier 治疗的患者。除去 3 名失去随访的患者和 1 名再次感染的患者,57 名患者(93.4%)最终获得了持续病毒学应答。尽管在这种医院环境中,感染艾滋病毒的吸毒者接受治疗的情况仍不理想,但事实证明,在医院环境中,采用快速筛查和简易治疗方案的 FIR 模式是可行的。要让所有感染了 HCV 的吸毒者都能接受 OAT 治疗,还需要进一步的创新策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Digestive Medicine
Advances in Digestive Medicine GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Advances in Digestive Medicine is the official peer-reviewed journal of GEST, DEST and TASL. Missions of AIDM are to enhance the quality of patient care, to promote researches in gastroenterology, endoscopy and hepatology related fields, and to develop platforms for digestive science. Specific areas of interest are included, but not limited to: • Acid-related disease • Small intestinal disease • Digestive cancer • Diagnostic & therapeutic endoscopy • Enteral nutrition • Innovation in endoscopic technology • Functional GI • Hepatitis • GI images • Liver cirrhosis • Gut hormone • NASH • Helicobacter pylori • Cancer screening • IBD • Laparoscopic surgery • Infectious disease of digestive tract • Genetics and metabolic disorder • Microbiota • Regenerative medicine • Pancreaticobiliary disease • Guideline & consensus.
期刊最新文献
A comparative analysis of radiation exposure in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage for acute cholecystitis An unusual subepithelial tumor of gastritis cystica profunda Issue Information High recurrence of reflux symptoms following proton pump inhibitor therapy discontinuation in patients with Los Angeles grade A/B erosive esophagitis: What is the next step? Early-onset gastric cancer: A distinct reality with significant implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1