Možnosti republikánské kritiky libertariánství

Q3 Arts and Humanities Reflexe Pub Date : 2024-04-07 DOI:10.14712/25337637.2024.4
Jan Buráň
{"title":"Možnosti republikánské kritiky libertariánství","authors":"Jan Buráň","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2024.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the possibilities of using civic republicanism in order to criticize Nozickian libertarianism on the ground of its own premises, especially the emphasis it puts on individual freedom. It evaluates the critique to which Nozick’s theory has been subjected to by Ian Shapiro, finding Shapiro’s objections lacking in understanding, yet valid in principle. The second line of attack is then led via the notion of freedom as non-domination (which inextricably intertwines it with democracy) and via the needs which must be satisfied in order for a state to function as a safeguard for liberty in the contemporary world of multinational corporations.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":"69 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflexe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2024.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores the possibilities of using civic republicanism in order to criticize Nozickian libertarianism on the ground of its own premises, especially the emphasis it puts on individual freedom. It evaluates the critique to which Nozick’s theory has been subjected to by Ian Shapiro, finding Shapiro’s objections lacking in understanding, yet valid in principle. The second line of attack is then led via the notion of freedom as non-domination (which inextricably intertwines it with democracy) and via the needs which must be satisfied in order for a state to function as a safeguard for liberty in the contemporary world of multinational corporations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共和党人批判自由主义的可能性
文章探讨了利用公民共和主义批评诺齐克自由主义的可能性,批评的依据是其自身的前提,尤其是其对个人自由的强调。文章评估了伊恩-夏皮罗(Ian Shapiro)对诺齐克理论的批判,发现夏皮罗的反对意见缺乏理解,但原则上是正确的。然后,通过自由即非统治的概念(这一概念与民主密不可分),以及在跨国公司林立的当代世界,国家作为自由的保障所必须满足的需求,引出了第二条攻击路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reflexe
Reflexe Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jaspersovo pojetí víry R. Gaita, Sdílené lidství. Přemýšlení o lásce, pravdě a spravedlnosti Supererogace neohrožuje morální evolucionismus Aby se dal Jaspers číst nově K Jaspersovu textu „O mé filosofii“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1