Comparative Efficacy of Intranasal Midazolam with per Rectal Diazepam to Control Acute Seizure in 6 months to 12 years’ Children

S. Ashraf, Tania Taher, Nazmul Haque, Kaisar Haroon, Narayan Chandra Saha
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Intranasal Midazolam with per Rectal Diazepam to Control Acute Seizure in 6 months to 12 years’ Children","authors":"S. Ashraf, Tania Taher, Nazmul Haque, Kaisar Haroon, Narayan Chandra Saha","doi":"10.3329/jninb.v9i2.70877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Convulsions are the most frequent neurological disorders affecting children. Acute seizure is a medical emergency, requires prompt and urgent control of ongoing seizure activity. Among the procedure to control seizure, treatment options like intranasal midazolam and per rectal diazepam are available for immediate management.\nObjective: The study was done to compare the safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam and per rectal diazepam to control acute seizure.\nMethod: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in paediatric department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital from 1st June 2008 to 15th April 2009.Children aged from 6 month to 12 years who came with acute seizure of any aetiology were included.\nResult: Among 110 patients mean time to control acute seizure in diazepam group was 4.1 minute and in midazolam group it was 3.2 minute and the difference was statistically significant. No significant side effects were noted in either of the group except for a transient fall in oxygen saturation.\nConclusion:In this study midazolam effectively controlled acute seizure compared to diazepam. Time taken to control seizure was significantly less in midazolam group. No serious complications were noted after administration of drugs. Intranasal midazolam could be a better alternative as it is effective in controlling seizure and has no significant side effects compared to the standard.\nJournal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, July 2023;9(2):103-107","PeriodicalId":16732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jninb.v9i2.70877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Convulsions are the most frequent neurological disorders affecting children. Acute seizure is a medical emergency, requires prompt and urgent control of ongoing seizure activity. Among the procedure to control seizure, treatment options like intranasal midazolam and per rectal diazepam are available for immediate management. Objective: The study was done to compare the safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam and per rectal diazepam to control acute seizure. Method: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in paediatric department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital from 1st June 2008 to 15th April 2009.Children aged from 6 month to 12 years who came with acute seizure of any aetiology were included. Result: Among 110 patients mean time to control acute seizure in diazepam group was 4.1 minute and in midazolam group it was 3.2 minute and the difference was statistically significant. No significant side effects were noted in either of the group except for a transient fall in oxygen saturation. Conclusion:In this study midazolam effectively controlled acute seizure compared to diazepam. Time taken to control seizure was significantly less in midazolam group. No serious complications were noted after administration of drugs. Intranasal midazolam could be a better alternative as it is effective in controlling seizure and has no significant side effects compared to the standard. Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, July 2023;9(2):103-107
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内咪达唑仑与直肠地西泮控制 6 个月至 12 岁儿童急性癫痫发作的疗效比较
背景介绍惊厥是儿童最常见的神经系统疾病。急性惊厥是一种医疗急症,需要及时、紧急地控制正在进行的惊厥活动。在控制癫痫发作的程序中,鼻内咪达唑仑和直肠地西泮等治疗方案可用于即时治疗:本研究旨在比较鼻内咪达唑仑和直肠地西泮控制急性癫痫发作的安全性和有效性:这项随机对照试验于 2008 年 6 月 1 日至 2009 年 4 月 15 日在达卡医学院附属医院儿科进行,研究对象包括年龄在 6 个月至 12 岁之间、因任何病因导致急性癫痫发作的儿童:在 110 名患者中,地西泮组控制急性癫痫发作的平均时间为 4.1 分钟,咪达唑仑组为 3.2 分钟,差异具有统计学意义。结论:在这项研究中,与地西泮相比,咪达唑仑能有效控制急性癫痫发作。咪达唑仑组控制癫痫发作所需的时间明显更短。用药后未发现严重并发症。与标准药物相比,鼻内咪达唑仑能有效控制癫痫发作,且无明显副作用,因此是一种更好的替代药物。孟加拉国家神经科学研究所期刊,2023 年 7 月;9(2):103-107
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavior of Non-Hybrid and Hybrid Forms of Fibro-Osseous Lesions in the Cranio-Maxillofacial Region of Patients Attending at the Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka City of Bangladesh Association of Ischaemic Heart Disease with Hospitalized Ischaemic Stroke Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital Trend of Patients Attended at Emergency Department of Referral Neurosciences Hospital in Bangladesh Rare Association between Congenital Dorsal Dermal Sinus with Tethered Cord Syndrome: A Case Report Subclavian Steal Syndrome Presented with Recurrent Syncope: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1